Joe Gordon writes:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Radoslav Gerganov
> wrote:
>
> On 12/15/2014 12:54 PM, Neil Jerram wrote:
>
> My Nova spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130732/) does not
> appear
> on this dashboard, even though I believe it's in good stand
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Radoslav Gerganov
> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/15/2014 12:54 PM, Neil Jerram wrote:
>>
>>> My Nova spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130732/) does not appear
>>> on this dashboard, even though I believe it's
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Radoslav Gerganov
wrote:
>
> On 12/15/2014 12:54 PM, Neil Jerram wrote:
>
>> My Nova spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130732/) does not appear
>> on this dashboard, even though I believe it's in good standing and - I
>> hope - close to approval. Do you know
On 12/15/2014 12:54 PM, Neil Jerram wrote:
My Nova spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130732/) does not appear
on this dashboard, even though I believe it's in good standing and - I
hope - close to approval. Do you know why - does it mean that I've set
some metadata field somewhere wrongly?
Hi Joe,
Joe Gordon writes:
> In preparation, I put together a nova-specs dashboard:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/141137
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=project%3A%5Eopenstack%2Fnova-specs+status%3Aopen+NOT+owner%3Aself+NOT+label%3AWorkflow%3C%3D-1+label%3AVerified%3E%3D
The dashboard is really cool, although I had to fix the spelling error...
Michael
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Andrew Laski
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/10/2014 04:41 PM, Michael Still wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> at the design summit we sai
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Andrew Laski
wrote:
>
> On 12/10/2014 04:41 PM, Michael Still wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications
>> after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve
>> had a lot of specifications propos
On 12/10/2014 04:41 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi,
at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications
after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve
had a lot of specifications proposed this cycle (166 to my count), and
haven’t kept up with the review wor
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 08:41:49AM +1100, Michael Still wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications
> after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve
> had a lot of specifications proposed this cycle (166 to my count), and
> haven’t
On 12/10/2014 01:41 PM, Michael Still wrote:
> at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications
> after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve
> had a lot of specifications proposed this cycle (166 to my count), and
> haven’t kept up with the review wor
On 2014/12/11 6:41, Michael Still wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications
> after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve
> had a lot of specifications proposed this cycle (166 to my count), and
> haven’t kept up with the revi
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Michael Still wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications
> after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve
> had a lot of specifications proposed this cycle (166 to my count), and
> haven’t kept up
Hi,
at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications
after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve
had a lot of specifications proposed this cycle (166 to my count), and
haven’t kept up with the review workload.
Therefore, I propose that Friday this we
13 matches
Mail list logo
