Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Kilo specs review day
Joe Gordon writes: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Radoslav Gerganov > wrote: > > On 12/15/2014 12:54 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > > My Nova spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130732/) does not > appear > on this dashboard, even though I believe it's in good standing > and - I > hope - close to approval. Do you know why - does it mean that > I've set > some metadata field somewhere wrongly? > > > > The dashboard doesn't show your own specs. You have to remove > "+NOT+owner%3Aself" from the URL to see them. Ah, as simple an explanation and solution as that. Thanks! > The latest iteration of the dashboard > (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130732/) shows your own specs: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=project%3Aopenstack%2Fnova%252Dspecs+status%3Aopen+NOT+label%3AWorkflow%3C%3D%252D1+branch%3Amaster+NOT+owner%3Aself&title=Nova+Specs&Your+are+a+reviewer%252c+but+haven%27t+voted+in+the+current+revision=reviewer%3Aself+NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D%252D2%252cself+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins&Not+blocked+by+%252D2s=NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3C%3D%252D2+NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D2+NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D%252D2%252cself+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins&No+votes+and+spec+is+%3E+1+week+old=NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D%252D2+age%3A7d+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins&Needs+final+%2B2=label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D2+NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D%252D2%252cself+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins&Broken+Specs+%28doesn%27t+pass+Jenkins%29=label%3AVerified%3C%3D%252D1%252cjenkins&Dead+Specs+%28blocked+by+a+%252D2%29=label%3ACode%252DReview%3C%3D%252D2 Actually that URL still doesn't. But this one does: https://review.openstack.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=project%3Aopenstack%2Fnova%252Dspecs+status%3Aopen+NOT+label%3AWorkflow%3C%3D%252D1+branch%3Amaster&title=Nova+Specs&Your+are+a+reviewer%252c+but+haven%27t+voted+in+the+current+revision=reviewer%3Aself+NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D%252D2%252cself+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins&Not+blocked+by+%252D2s=NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3C%3D%252D2+NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D2+NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D%252D2%252cself+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins&No+votes+and+spec+is+%3E+1+week+old=NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D%252D2+age%3A7d+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins&Needs+final+%2B2=label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D2+NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D%252D2%252cself+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins&Broken+Specs+%28doesn%27t+pass+Jenkins%29=label%3AVerified%3C%3D%252D1%252cjenkins&Dead+Specs+%28blocked+by+a+%252D2%29=label%3ACode%252DReview%3C%3D%252D2 Thanks for your reply and for generating this dashboard! Neil ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Kilo specs review day
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Radoslav Gerganov > wrote: >> >> On 12/15/2014 12:54 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: >> >>> My Nova spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130732/) does not appear >>> on this dashboard, even though I believe it's in good standing and - I >>> hope - close to approval. Do you know why - does it mean that I've set >>> some metadata field somewhere wrongly? >>> >>> >> The dashboard doesn't show your own specs. You have to remove >> "+NOT+owner%3Aself" from the URL to see them. > > > The latest iteration of the dashboard ( > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130732/) shows your own specs: > Looks like that section was removed in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141411/ > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=project%3Aopenstack%2Fnova%252Dspecs+status%3Aopen+NOT+label%3AWorkflow%3C%3D%252D1+branch%3Amaster+NOT+owner%3Aself&title=Nova+Specs&Your+are+a+reviewer%252c+but+haven%27t+voted+in+the+current+revision=reviewer%3Aself+NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D%252D2%252cself+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins&Not+blocked+by+%252D2s=NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3C%3D%252D2+NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D2+NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D%252D2%252cself+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins&No+votes+and+spec+is+%3E+1+week+old=NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D%252D2+age%3A7d+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins&Needs+final+%2B2=label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D2+NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D%252D2%252cself+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins&Broken+Specs+%28doesn%27t+pass+Jenkins%29=label%3AVerified%3C%3D%252D1%252cjenkins&Dead+Specs+%28blocked+by+a+%252D2%29=label%3ACode%252DReview%3C%3D%252D2 > > >> >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Kilo specs review day
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Radoslav Gerganov wrote: > > On 12/15/2014 12:54 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > >> My Nova spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130732/) does not appear >> on this dashboard, even though I believe it's in good standing and - I >> hope - close to approval. Do you know why - does it mean that I've set >> some metadata field somewhere wrongly? >> >> > The dashboard doesn't show your own specs. You have to remove > "+NOT+owner%3Aself" from the URL to see them. The latest iteration of the dashboard ( https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130732/) shows your own specs: https://review.openstack.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=project%3Aopenstack%2Fnova%252Dspecs+status%3Aopen+NOT+label%3AWorkflow%3C%3D%252D1+branch%3Amaster+NOT+owner%3Aself&title=Nova+Specs&Your+are+a+reviewer%252c+but+haven%27t+voted+in+the+current+revision=reviewer%3Aself+NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D%252D2%252cself+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins&Not+blocked+by+%252D2s=NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3C%3D%252D2+NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D2+NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D%252D2%252cself+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins&No+votes+and+spec+is+%3E+1+week+old=NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D%252D2+age%3A7d+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins&Needs+final+%2B2=label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D2+NOT+label%3ACode%252DReview%3E%3D%252D2%252cself+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins&Broken+Specs+%28doesn%27t+pass+Jenkins%29=label%3AVerified%3C%3D%252D1%252cjenkins&Dead+Specs+%28blocked+by+a+%252D2%29=label%3ACode%252DReview%3C%3D%252D2 > > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Kilo specs review day
On 12/15/2014 12:54 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: My Nova spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130732/) does not appear on this dashboard, even though I believe it's in good standing and - I hope - close to approval. Do you know why - does it mean that I've set some metadata field somewhere wrongly? The dashboard doesn't show your own specs. You have to remove "+NOT+owner%3Aself" from the URL to see them. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Kilo specs review day
Hi Joe, Joe Gordon writes: > In preparation, I put together a nova-specs dashboard: > > https://review.openstack.org/141137 > > https://review.openstack.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=project%3A%5Eopenstack%2Fnova-specs+status%3Aopen+NOT+owner%3Aself+NOT+label%3AWorkflow%3C%3D-1+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins+NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D-2%252cself+branch%3Amaster&title=Nova+Specs&&Your+are+a+reviewer%2C+but+haven%27t+voted+in+the+current+revision=reviewer%3Aself&Needs+final+%2B2=label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D2+NOT%28reviewerin%3Anova-specs-core+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-1%29+limit%3A100&Passed+Jenkins%2C+Positive+Nova-Core+Feedback=NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D2+%28reviewerin%3Anova-core+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D1%29+NOT%28reviewerin%3Anova-core+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-1%29+limit%3A100&Passed+Jenkins%2C+No+Positive+Nova-Core+Feedback%2C+No+Negative+Feedback=NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-1+NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D2+NOT%28reviewerin%3Anova-core+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D1%29+limit%3A100&Wayward+Changes+%28Changes+with+no+code+review+in+the+last+7+days%29=NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D2+age%3A7d&Some+negative +feedback%2C+might+still+be+worth+commenting=label%3ACode-Review%3D-1+NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3D-2+limit%3A100&Dead+Specs=label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-2 My Nova spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130732/) does not appear on this dashboard, even though I believe it's in good standing and - I hope - close to approval. Do you know why - does it mean that I've set some metadata field somewhere wrongly? Many thanks, Neil ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Kilo specs review day
The dashboard is really cool, although I had to fix the spelling error... Michael On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Andrew Laski > wrote: >> >> >> On 12/10/2014 04:41 PM, Michael Still wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications >>> after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve >>> had a lot of specifications proposed this cycle (166 to my count), and >>> haven’t kept up with the review workload. >>> >>> Therefore, I propose that Friday this week be a specs review day. We >>> need to burn down the queue of specs needing review, as well as >>> abandoning those which aren’t getting regular updates based on our >>> review comments. >>> >>> I’d appreciate nova-specs-core doing reviews on Friday, but its always >>> super helpful when non-cores review as well. A +1 for a developer or >>> operator gives nova-specs-core a good signal of what might be ready to >>> approve, and that helps us optimize our review time. >>> >>> For reference, the specs to review may be found at: >>> >>> >>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/nova-specs+status:open,n,z >>> >>> Thanks heaps, >>> Michael >>> >> >> It will be nice to have a good push before we hit the deadline. >> >> I would like to remind priority owners to update their list of any >> outstanding specs at >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-nova-priorities-tracking so they can >> be targeted during the review day. > > > > In preparation, I put together a nova-specs dashboard: > > https://review.openstack.org/141137 > > https://review.openstack.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=project%3A%5Eopenstack%2Fnova-specs+status%3Aopen+NOT+owner%3Aself+NOT+label%3AWorkflow%3C%3D-1+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins+NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D-2%252cself+branch%3Amaster&title=Nova+Specs&&Your+are+a+reviewer%2C+but+haven%27t+voted+in+the+current+revision=reviewer%3Aself&Needs+final+%2B2=label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D2+NOT%28reviewerin%3Anova-specs-core+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-1%29+limit%3A100&Passed+Jenkins%2C+Positive+Nova-Core+Feedback=NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D2+%28reviewerin%3Anova-core+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D1%29+NOT%28reviewerin%3Anova-core+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-1%29+limit%3A100&Passed+Jenkins%2C+No+Positive+Nova-Core+Feedback%2C+No+Negative+Feedback=NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-1+NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D2+NOT%28reviewerin%3Anova-core+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D1%29+limit%3A100&Wayward+Changes+%28Changes+with+no+code+review+in+the+last+7+days%29=NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D2+age%3A7d&Some+negative+feedback%2C+might+still+be+worth+commenting=label%3ACode-Review%3D-1+NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3D-2+limit%3A100&Dead+Specs=label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-2 > >> >> >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Rackspace Australia ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Kilo specs review day
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > On 12/10/2014 04:41 PM, Michael Still wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications >> after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve >> had a lot of specifications proposed this cycle (166 to my count), and >> haven’t kept up with the review workload. >> >> Therefore, I propose that Friday this week be a specs review day. We >> need to burn down the queue of specs needing review, as well as >> abandoning those which aren’t getting regular updates based on our >> review comments. >> >> I’d appreciate nova-specs-core doing reviews on Friday, but its always >> super helpful when non-cores review as well. A +1 for a developer or >> operator gives nova-specs-core a good signal of what might be ready to >> approve, and that helps us optimize our review time. >> >> For reference, the specs to review may be found at: >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/nova- >> specs+status:open,n,z >> >> Thanks heaps, >> Michael >> >> > It will be nice to have a good push before we hit the deadline. > > I would like to remind priority owners to update their list of any > outstanding specs at https://etherpad.openstack. > org/p/kilo-nova-priorities-tracking so they can be targeted during the > review day. In preparation, I put together a nova-specs dashboard: https://review.openstack.org/141137 https://review.openstack.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=project%3A%5Eopenstack%2Fnova-specs+status%3Aopen+NOT+owner%3Aself+NOT+label%3AWorkflow%3C%3D-1+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins+NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D-2%252cself+branch%3Amaster&title=Nova+Specs&&Your+are+a+reviewer%2C+but+haven%27t+voted+in+the+current+revision=reviewer%3Aself&Needs+final+%2B2=label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D2+NOT%28reviewerin%3Anova-specs-core+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-1%29+limit%3A100&Passed+Jenkins%2C+Positive+Nova-Core+Feedback=NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D2+%28reviewerin%3Anova-core+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D1%29+NOT%28reviewerin%3Anova-core+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-1%29+limit%3A100&Passed+Jenkins%2C+No+Positive+Nova-Core+Feedback%2C+No+Negative+Feedback=NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-1+NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D2+NOT%28reviewerin%3Anova-core+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D1%29+limit%3A100&Wayward+Changes+%28Changes+with+no+code+review+in+the+last+7+days%29=NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D2+age%3A7d&Some+negative+feedback%2C+might+still+be+worth+commenting=label%3ACode-Review%3D-1+NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3D-2+limit%3A100&Dead+Specs=label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-2 > > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Kilo specs review day
On 12/10/2014 04:41 PM, Michael Still wrote: Hi, at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve had a lot of specifications proposed this cycle (166 to my count), and haven’t kept up with the review workload. Therefore, I propose that Friday this week be a specs review day. We need to burn down the queue of specs needing review, as well as abandoning those which aren’t getting regular updates based on our review comments. I’d appreciate nova-specs-core doing reviews on Friday, but its always super helpful when non-cores review as well. A +1 for a developer or operator gives nova-specs-core a good signal of what might be ready to approve, and that helps us optimize our review time. For reference, the specs to review may be found at: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/nova-specs+status:open,n,z Thanks heaps, Michael It will be nice to have a good push before we hit the deadline. I would like to remind priority owners to update their list of any outstanding specs at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-nova-priorities-tracking so they can be targeted during the review day. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Kilo specs review day
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 08:41:49AM +1100, Michael Still wrote: > Hi, > > at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications > after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve > had a lot of specifications proposed this cycle (166 to my count), and > haven’t kept up with the review workload. > > Therefore, I propose that Friday this week be a specs review day. We > need to burn down the queue of specs needing review, as well as > abandoning those which aren’t getting regular updates based on our > review comments. > > I’d appreciate nova-specs-core doing reviews on Friday, but its always > super helpful when non-cores review as well. Sure it could be *super* useful :) - I will try to help on this way. > A +1 for a developer or > operator gives nova-specs-core a good signal of what might be ready to > approve, and that helps us optimize our review time. > > For reference, the specs to review may be found at: > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/nova-specs+status:open,n,z > > Thanks heaps, > Michael > > -- > Rackspace Australia > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Kilo specs review day
On 12/10/2014 01:41 PM, Michael Still wrote: > at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications > after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve > had a lot of specifications proposed this cycle (166 to my count), and > haven’t kept up with the review workload. Great idea, mikal, thanks for raising this topic. I have asked the Product and Win The Enterprise working groups to help out, too. cheers, stef ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Kilo specs review day
On 2014/12/11 6:41, Michael Still wrote: > Hi, > > at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications > after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve > had a lot of specifications proposed this cycle (166 to my count), and > haven’t kept up with the review workload. > > Therefore, I propose that Friday this week be a specs review day. We > need to burn down the queue of specs needing review, as well as > abandoning those which aren’t getting regular updates based on our > review comments. > > I’d appreciate nova-specs-core doing reviews on Friday, but its always > super helpful when non-cores review as well. A +1 for a developer or > operator gives nova-specs-core a good signal of what might be ready to > approve, and that helps us optimize our review time. > > For reference, the specs to review may be found at: > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/nova-specs+status:open,n,z +1 for the review day, and the list is very long. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Kilo specs review day
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Michael Still wrote: > Hi, > > at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications > after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve > had a lot of specifications proposed this cycle (166 to my count), and > haven’t kept up with the review workload. > > Therefore, I propose that Friday this week be a specs review day. We > need to burn down the queue of specs needing review, as well as > abandoning those which aren’t getting regular updates based on our > review comments. > > I’d appreciate nova-specs-core doing reviews on Friday, but its always > super helpful when non-cores review as well. A +1 for a developer or > operator gives nova-specs-core a good signal of what might be ready to > approve, and that helps us optimize our review time. > > For reference, the specs to review may be found at: > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/nova-specs+status:open,n,z ++, count me in! > > > Thanks heaps, > Michael > > -- > Rackspace Australia > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [nova] Kilo specs review day
Hi, at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve had a lot of specifications proposed this cycle (166 to my count), and haven’t kept up with the review workload. Therefore, I propose that Friday this week be a specs review day. We need to burn down the queue of specs needing review, as well as abandoning those which aren’t getting regular updates based on our review comments. I’d appreciate nova-specs-core doing reviews on Friday, but its always super helpful when non-cores review as well. A +1 for a developer or operator gives nova-specs-core a good signal of what might be ready to approve, and that helps us optimize our review time. For reference, the specs to review may be found at: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/nova-specs+status:open,n,z Thanks heaps, Michael -- Rackspace Australia ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
