On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote:
In Murano project we do see a positive impact of BigTent model. Since
Murano was accepted as a part of BigTent community we had a lot of
conversations with potential users. They were driven exactly by
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
One of the stated problems the 'big tent' is supposed to solve is:
'The binary nature of the integrated release results in projects outside
the integrated release failing to get the recognition they deserve.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/15/2015 06:20 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
One of the stated problems the 'big tent' is supposed to solve is:
'The binary nature of the integrated release results in projects outside
the integrated release failing to get
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com
wrote:
Joe,
I must respectfully disagree. The statistics you used to indicate that
Magnum did not benefit from joining the tent are not telling the whole
story. Facts:
Agreed, after looking at the numbers some more,
On 06/16/2015 08:16 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote:
In Murano project we do see a positive impact of BigTent model. Since
Murano was accepted as a part of BigTent community we had a lot of
conversations with potential users. They were driven exactly by the fact
that Murano is now officially
Joe,
I must respectfully disagree. The statistics you used to indicate that Magnum
did not benefit from joining the tent are not telling the whole story. Facts:
1) When we had our Midcycle just before joining OpenStack in March we had 24
contributors from 13 affiliations when we joined. You
In Murano project we do see a positive impact of BigTent model. Since
Murano was accepted as a part of BigTent community we had a lot of
conversations with potential users. They were driven exactly by the fact
that Murano is now officially recognized in OpenStack community. It might
be a wrong
i won't speak to whether this confirms/refutes the usefulness of the big
tent. that said, probably as a by-product of being in non-stop meetings
with sales/marketing/managers for last few days, i think there needs to
be better definitions (or better publicised definitions) of what the
goals of
On 16/06/15 04:39 -0400, gordon chung wrote:
i won't speak to whether this confirms/refutes the usefulness of the big tent.
that said, probably as a by-product of being in non-stop meetings with sales/
marketing/managers for last few days, i think there needs to be better
definitions (or better
You may also find my explanation about the Big Tent helpful in this
interview with Niki Acosta and Jeff Dickey:
http://blogs.cisco.com/cloud/ospod-29-jay-pipes
Best,
-jay
On 06/16/2015 06:09 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 16/06/15 04:39 -0400, gordon chung wrote:
i won't speak to whether this
Joe,
When looking at stackalytics [2] for each project, we don't see any
noticeably change in number of reviews, contributors, or number of commits
from before and after each project joined OpenStack.
I can't agree on this.
*) Rally is facing core-reviewers bottleneck currently.
We have
One of the stated problems the 'big tent' is supposed to solve is:
'The binary nature of the integrated release results in projects outside
the integrated release failing to get the recognition they deserve.
Non-official projects are second- or third-class citizens which can't get
development
On 06/15/2015 07:30 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
Joe,
When looking at stackalytics [2] for each project, we don't see any
noticeably change in number of reviews, contributors, or number of
commits from before and after each project joined OpenStack.
I can't agree on this.
*) Rally
On 06/15/2015 06:20 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
One of the stated problems the 'big tent' is supposed to solve is:
'The binary nature of the integrated release results in projects outside
the integrated release failing to get the recognition they deserve.
Non-official projects are second- or
On 15/06/15 19:20 +0900, Joe Gordon wrote:
One of the stated problems the 'big tent' is supposed to solve is:
'The binary nature of the integrated release results in projects outside the
integrated release failing to get the recognition they deserve. Non-official
projects are second- or
Joe Gordon wrote:
[...]
Below is a list of the first few few projects to join OpenStack after
the big tent, All of which have now been part of OpenStack for at least
two months.[1]
* Mangum - Tue Mar 24 20:17:36 2015
* Murano - Tue Mar 24 20:48:25 2015
* Congress - Tue Mar 31 20:24:04
I'd also like to point out that if the state of the projects has encouraged
*new* contributors to OpenStack, then their contributions will likely take a
couple to a few months to become visible in a significant way in the
statistics. Two to three months to get your first merge is extremely
17 matches
Mail list logo
