I agree as well. I think moving them to an unimplemented folder makes sense
and would be helpful in reviewing if one re-proposes a blueprint.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/15/2014 10:01 AM, Kevin Benton wrote:
Some of the specs had a
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
I saw that the specs that didn't make the deadline for the feature freeze
were removed from the tree completely.[1] For easier reference, can we
instead revert that commit to restore them and then move them into a release
Some of the specs had a significant amount of detail and thought put into
them. It seems like a waste to bury them in a git tree history.
By having them in a place where external parties (e.g. operators) can
easily find them, they could get more visibility and feedback for any
future revisions.
On 09/15/2014 10:01 AM, Kevin Benton wrote:
Some of the specs had a significant amount of detail and thought put
into them. It seems like a waste to bury them in a git tree history.
By having them in a place where external parties (e.g. operators) can
easily find them, they could get more
