On 09/08/14 05:09, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 08/06/2014 01:41 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/06/2014 01:40 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
On 06/08/14 13:30, Robert Collins wrote:
On 6 August 2014 17:27, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
On 06/08/14 13:24, Robert Collins wrote:
What happened to
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:40:28PM +0800, Tom Fifield wrote:
snip/
While DB migrations are running things like the nova metadata service
can/will misbehave - and user code within instances will be affected.
Thats arguably VM downtime.
OTOH you could define it more narrowly as 'VMs are not
On 08/06/2014 01:41 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/06/2014 01:40 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
On 06/08/14 13:30, Robert Collins wrote:
On 6 August 2014 17:27, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
On 06/08/14 13:24, Robert Collins wrote:
What happened to your DB migrations then? :)
Sorry if I
On Aug 8, 2014, at 14:09 , Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/06/2014 01:41 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/06/2014 01:40 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
On 06/08/14 13:30, Robert Collins wrote:
On 6 August 2014 17:27, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
On 06/08/14 13:24, Robert Collins
In many cases the users I've spoken to who are looking for a live path out
of nova-network on to neutron are actually completely OK with some API
service downtime (metadata service is an API service by their definition).
A little 'glitch' in the network is also OK for many of them.
Contrast
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
On 06/08/14 03:54, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/05/2014 03:23 PM, Collins, Sean wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:50:45PM EDT, Monty Taylor wrote:
However, I think the cost to providing that path far outweighs
the benefit in
On 08/06/2014 01:40 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
On 06/08/14 13:30, Robert Collins wrote:
On 6 August 2014 17:27, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
On 06/08/14 13:24, Robert Collins wrote:
What happened to your DB migrations then? :)
Sorry if I misunderstood, I thought we were talking
On Aug 5, 2014, at 4:52 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
I'm pretty sure yahoo is another case, with a large set of clusters on
nova-network still ;)
I believe we have been active in these discussions, although I'm unsure what
was discussed at the meetup (being that I had
On 08/05/2014 09:18 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Hello stackers, TC, Neutron contributors,
At the Nova mid-cycle meetup last week in Oregon, during the discussion
about the future of nova-network, the topic of nova-network - Neutron
migration came up.
For some reason, I had been clueless about the
Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote on 08/05/2014 12:27:14 PM:
On 08/05/2014 09:18 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Hello stackers, TC, Neutron contributors,
At the Nova mid-cycle meetup last week in Oregon, during the
discussion
about the future of nova-network, the topic of nova-network -
Jay,
I do agree with you on the focus areas. I believe Neutron should focus on
the nova-parity (DVR) and DB migrations more than ever, instead of
increasing the priority to new API such as the GBP. Actually, yesterday
Neutron IRC showed the need of having a more focused work instead of
picking in
On 08/05/2014 09:34 AM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote on 08/05/2014 12:27:14 PM:
On 08/05/2014 09:18 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Hello stackers, TC, Neutron contributors,
At the Nova mid-cycle meetup last week in Oregon, during the
discussion
about the future of
On 08/05/2014 12:18 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Hello stackers, TC, Neutron contributors,
At the Nova mid-cycle meetup last week in Oregon, during the discussion
about the future of nova-network, the topic of nova-network - Neutron
migration came up.
For some reason, I had been clueless about
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:50:45PM EDT, Monty Taylor wrote:
However, I think the cost to providing that path far outweighs
the benefit in the face of other things on our plate.
Perhaps those large operators that are hoping for a
Nova-Network-Neutron zero-downtime live migration, could dedicate
On 08/05/2014 03:23 PM, Collins, Sean wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:50:45PM EDT, Monty Taylor wrote:
However, I think the cost to providing that path far outweighs
the benefit in the face of other things on our plate.
Perhaps those large operators that are hoping for a
On Aug 5, 2014 12:57 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/05/2014 03:23 PM, Collins, Sean wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:50:45PM EDT, Monty Taylor wrote:
However, I think the cost to providing that path far outweighs
the benefit in the face of other things on our plate.
I'm pretty sure yahoo is another case, with a large set of clusters on
nova-network still ;)
I believe we have been active in these discussions, although I'm unsure what
was discussed at the meetup (being that I had planned vacation, right now
actually).
Anyways I think yahoo is fine with
On 06/08/14 03:54, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/05/2014 03:23 PM, Collins, Sean wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:50:45PM EDT, Monty Taylor wrote:
However, I think the cost to providing that path far outweighs
the benefit in the face of other things on our plate.
Perhaps those large operators that
On 08/05/2014 11:25 PM, Tom Fifield wrote:
On 06/08/14 03:54, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/05/2014 03:23 PM, Collins, Sean wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:50:45PM EDT, Monty Taylor wrote:
However, I think the cost to providing that path far outweighs
the benefit in the face of other things on our
On 06/08/14 12:40, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/05/2014 11:25 PM, Tom Fifield wrote:
On 06/08/14 03:54, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/05/2014 03:23 PM, Collins, Sean wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:50:45PM EDT, Monty Taylor wrote:
However, I think the cost to providing that path far outweighs
the
On 6 August 2014 16:57, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
Note, however, that nobody is suggesting not having a migration path.
I'm just suggesting relaxing the requirement that the migration from
nova-network to neutron be without any downtime of instances.
These users do not consider
On 06/08/14 13:18, Robert Collins wrote:
On 6 August 2014 16:57, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
Note, however, that nobody is suggesting not having a migration path.
I'm just suggesting relaxing the requirement that the migration from
nova-network to neutron be without any downtime of
On 6 August 2014 17:22, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
On 06/08/14 13:18, Robert Collins wrote:
On 6 August 2014 16:57, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
Note, however, that nobody is suggesting not having a migration path.
I'm just suggesting relaxing the requirement that the
On 06/08/14 13:24, Robert Collins wrote:
On 6 August 2014 17:22, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
On 06/08/14 13:18, Robert Collins wrote:
On 6 August 2014 16:57, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
Note, however, that nobody is suggesting not having a migration path.
I'm just
On 6 August 2014 17:27, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
On 06/08/14 13:24, Robert Collins wrote:
What happened to your DB migrations then? :)
Sorry if I misunderstood, I thought we were talking about running VM
downtime here?
While DB migrations are running things like the nova
On 06/08/14 13:30, Robert Collins wrote:
On 6 August 2014 17:27, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
On 06/08/14 13:24, Robert Collins wrote:
What happened to your DB migrations then? :)
Sorry if I misunderstood, I thought we were talking about running VM
downtime here?
While DB
26 matches
Mail list logo
