++ for B301
We'll be on summit for the whole week, probably, we could have two key
signing parties?
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2014-05-09 15:51:19 +0800 (+0800), Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> What's the final decision? Which room will we use?
>
> I'm personally leanin
On 2014-05-09 15:51:19 +0800 (+0800), Thomas Goirand wrote:
> What's the final decision? Which room will we use?
I'm personally leaning toward B301 (in the Design Summit area) since
I think that will make it easier for participants to arrive on time.
As Thierry also suggested this and nobody else
On 05/07/2014 01:26 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> Given that's Sean's session before the break (assuming it doesn't
> get reshuffled) and he's signed up for the key signing too, he could
> probably be persuaded to end on time and allow us to quickly free up
> the room for that. If we go this route we
On 2014-04-29 18:31:37 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> I've updated the wiki article to note that I'll lock it for further
> edits at the end of the (UTC) day on the 7th and generate the
> checksummed list from it, then link it there for everyone to
> download as quickly as I can do so. I'll
On 2014-05-06 12:36:34 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Note that we could pick any of the Design Summit rooms (they are
> larger and don't require us to move on 4th floor). They should all
> be empty during the break.
I was hesitant to try and use one of the design session rooms for
this si
Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2014-04-29 18:01:44 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> [...]
>> I'll check with the team handling venue logistics right now and
>> update this thread with options. I'm also inquiring about the
>> availability of a projector if we get one of the non-design-session
>> b
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2014-04-30 15:47:21 -0700:
> On 2014-04-29 18:01:44 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> [...]
> > I'll check with the team handling venue logistics right now and
> > update this thread with options. I'm also inquiring about the
> > availability of a proj
Awesome! thanks @fungi
-- dims
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2014-04-29 18:01:44 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> [...]
>> I'll check with the team handling venue logistics right now and
>> update this thread with options. I'm also inquiring about the
>> avail
On 2014-04-29 18:01:44 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
[...]
> I'll check with the team handling venue logistics right now and
> update this thread with options. I'm also inquiring about the
> availability of a projector if we get one of the non-design-session
> breakout rooms, and I can bring
On 2014-04-29 08:52:38 +0400 (+0400), Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
> +1 to lock May 7
I've updated the wiki article to note that I'll lock it for further
edits at the end of the (UTC) day on the 7th and generate the
checksummed list from it, then link it there for everyone to
download as quickly as I ca
On 2014-04-29 09:16:53 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
[...]
> I think Wednesday would be the ideal day, as it has the most overlap
> with the conference and is at least adjacent to if not within most
> design tracks.
[...]
Seconded.
> I suggest we ensure that everyone understands the process a
Break time is extremely busy in the developers lounge. We can have
others in the room, but we need enough of a space for everyone to stand
in two lines and rotate and be uninterrupted.
Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas's message of 2014-04-29 09:07:12 -0700:
> How about 10:30 AM Break on Wednesday at
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2014-04-29 07:32:59 -0700:
> On 04/29/2014 06:42 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > On 2014-04-26 17:05:41 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
> >> Just a friendly reminder to add yourself to this list if you are
> >> interested in participating in the key signing
How about 10:30 AM Break on Wednesday at the Developers Lounge (Do we
have one this time?)
-- dims
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 04/29/2014 06:42 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>> On 2014-04-26 17:05:41 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
>>> Just a friendly reminder to a
On 04/29/2014 06:42 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2014-04-26 17:05:41 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
>> Just a friendly reminder to add yourself to this list if you are
>> interested in participating in the key signing in Atlanta:
>>
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OpenPGP_Web_of_Trust/Juno_
+1 to lock May 7
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> +1 to lock down the page May 7th.
>
> -- dims
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Jeremy Stanley
> >
> wrote:
> > On 2014-04-26 17:05:41 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
> >> Just a friendly reminder to add yourself to thi
+1 to lock down the page May 7th.
-- dims
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2014-04-26 17:05:41 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
>> Just a friendly reminder to add yourself to this list if you are
>> interested in participating in the key signing in Atlanta:
>>
>> http
On 2014-04-26 17:05:41 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
> Just a friendly reminder to add yourself to this list if you are
> interested in participating in the key signing in Atlanta:
>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OpenPGP_Web_of_Trust/Juno_Summit
[...]
It has a sign-up cutoff of two weeks
On 2014-04-28 18:37:56 +0400 (+0400), Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
> IIRC there was a key signing party on the launch time in Hong
> Kong, isn't it?
Nope, according to the old wiki article we ended up doing it
Thursday November 7 2013 during the 10:30-11:00 AM break. (Though I
suppose that was fairly cl
IIRC there was a key signing party on the launch time in Hong Kong, isn't it?
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Just a friendly reminder to add yourself to this list if you are
> interested in participating in the key signing in Atlanta:
>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ope
Just a friendly reminder to add yourself to this list if you are
interested in participating in the key signing in Atlanta:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OpenPGP_Web_of_Trust/Juno_Summit
Now that we have more visibility about schedules, I think we should try
to find a time slot. Does anybody ha
On 04/01/2014 04:03 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2014-03-31 10:55:06 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> No miracle here... All slots are pretty full as expected. I think our
>> best bet is still the 30-min morning break on Wednesday or Thursday at
>> 10:30am.
>
> Would finding an available
On 2014-03-31 14:45:20 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
> Would it be entirely out of line to take a portion of an infra-team
> session to do this?
[...]
> * This seems relevant to OpenStack development infrastructure.
[...]
About the only place we have any existing infrastructure automation
curr
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2014-03-31 13:03:28 -0700:
> On 2014-03-31 10:55:06 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > No miracle here... All slots are pretty full as expected. I think our
> > best bet is still the 30-min morning break on Wednesday or Thursday at
> > 10:30am.
>
> W
On 2014-03-31 10:55:06 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote:
> No miracle here... All slots are pretty full as expected. I think our
> best bet is still the 30-min morning break on Wednesday or Thursday at
> 10:30am.
Would finding an available room for an hour sometime on Monday make
sense instead?
Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2014-03-29 19:00:33 -0700 (-0700), Mark Atwood wrote:
>> Are there plans for a PGP keysigning party at the Juno Summit in
>> Atlanta, similar to the one at the Icehouse summit in Hong Kong?
> [...]
>
> Absolutely!
>
> Thierry, any ideas on how to best fit it into the sc
Mark Atwood wrote:
> Are there plans for a PGP keysigning party at the Juno Summit in
> Atlanta, similar to the one at the Icehouse summit in Hong Kong?
>
> Inspired by the URL at
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OpenPGP_Web_of_Trust/Icehouse_Summit
> I looked for
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wi
On 2014-03-30 14:32:55 +0800 (+0800), Thomas Goirand wrote:
[...]
> One thing about last key signing party, is that I didn't really
> like the photocopy method.
[...]
Nor did I, but it was a last-minute production since I didn't expect
the majority of attendees to bring cards with their own key
fi
On 2014-03-30 09:05:51 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
[...]
> Now, having somebody else print the lists is fine as long as you
> have key owners look at your copy and verify the fingerprint on
> your list. This is _extremely_ inefficient compared to the
> Sassaman Efficient protocol, but it work
On 2014-03-29 19:00:33 -0700 (-0700), Mark Atwood wrote:
> Are there plans for a PGP keysigning party at the Juno Summit in
> Atlanta, similar to the one at the Icehouse summit in Hong Kong?
[...]
Absolutely!
Thierry, any ideas on how to best fit it into the schedule?
...hopefully not wedged into
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2014-03-29 23:32:55 -0700:
> On 03/30/2014 10:00 AM, Mark Atwood wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Are there plans for a PGP keysigning party at the Juno Summit in
> > Atlanta, similar to the one at the Icehouse summit in Hong Kong?
> >
> > Inspired by the URL at
>
On 03/30/2014 10:00 AM, Mark Atwood wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Are there plans for a PGP keysigning party at the Juno Summit in
> Atlanta, similar to the one at the Icehouse summit in Hong Kong?
>
> Inspired by the URL at
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OpenPGP_Web_of_Trust/Icehouse_Summit
> I looked for
32 matches
Mail list logo