Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

2014-08-13 Thread Baohua Yang
Like the policy-group naming. The policy-target is better than policy-point, but still feel there's some little confusing, as the target is usually meaning what it's for, but not what it's on. Hence, the policy-endpoint might be more exact. On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Jay Pipes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

2014-08-08 Thread Jay Pipes
On 08/07/2014 01:17 PM, Ronak Shah wrote: Hi, Following a very interesting and vocal thread on GBP for last couple of days and the GBP meeting today, GBP sub-team proposes following name changes to the resource. policy-point for endpoint policy-group for endpointgroup (epg) Please reply if

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

2014-08-08 Thread Sumit Naiksatam
Thanks Jay for your constructive feedback on this. I personally think that 'policy-target' is a good option. I am not sure what the rest of the team thinks, perhaps they can chime in. On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/07/2014 01:17 PM, Ronak Shah wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

2014-08-08 Thread Ryan Moats
+1 Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com wrote on 08/08/2014 02:44:55 PM: From: Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 08/08/2014 02:45 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

2014-08-08 Thread Stephen Wong
policy target sounds good. +1 On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Jay for your constructive feedback on this. I personally think that 'policy-target' is a good option. I am not sure what the rest of the team thinks, perhaps they can chime

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

2014-08-08 Thread Ivar Lazzaro
That's ok for me as well! +1 On Aug 8, 2014 10:04 PM, Prasad Vellanki prasad.vella...@oneconvergence.com wrote: It sounds good +1 On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Jay for your constructive feedback on this. I personally think that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

2014-08-08 Thread Henry Fourie
+1 for policy-target -Original Message- From: Sumit Naiksatam [mailto:sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 12:45 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming Thanks Jay

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

2014-08-07 Thread Andrew Mann
Can you include the definition/description of what each is here as well? I think there was a description in the 100+ thread of doom, but I don't want to go back there :) On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Ronak Shah ronak.malav.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Following a very interesting and vocal

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

2014-08-07 Thread Edgar Magana
I am sorry that I could not attend the GBP meeting. Is there any reason why the IEFT standard is not considered? http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3198 I would like to understand the argument why we are creating new names instead of using the standard ones. Edgar From: Ronak Shah

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

2014-08-07 Thread Ryan Moats
. Ryan Moats Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.com wrote on 08/07/2014 04:02:43 PM: From: Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 08/07/2014 04:03 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

2014-08-07 Thread Sumit Naiksatam
/2014 04:03 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming I am sorry that I could not attend the GBP meeting. Is there any reason why the IEFT standard is not considered? http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3198 I would like to understand the argument why we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

2014-08-07 Thread Edgar Magana
: Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 2:18 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming Edgar- I can't speak for anyone else, but in my

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

2014-08-07 Thread Edgar Magana
: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming I am sorry that I could not attend the GBP meeting. Is there any reason why the IEFT standard is not considered? http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3198 I would like to understand the argument why we are creating new names instead

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

2014-08-07 Thread Ryan Moats
Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.com wrote on 08/07/2014 04:37:39 PM: From: Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 08/07/2014 04:40 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

2014-08-07 Thread Edgar Magana
at 2:45 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.commailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com