Re: [openstack-dev] [Baremetal][Neutron] SDN Solution for Openstack Baremetal Driver

2014-05-28 Thread Tim Chim
Ryota,

Thanks for your invitation. Unfortunately I did not join the summit. Wish
you had a good time and enjoy the summit ;). However I am really interested
in your baremetal + SDN solution. Would you mind elaborate a bit more about
the architecture and design of the solution?

Regards,
Tim

On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Tim Chim fsc...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi fellow stacker,

 I am designing for a Baremetal stack with SDN support recently and would
 like to seek for the help from you all for how to do so.

 I am building an automated testing framework on top of Openstack Havana.
 For performance and platform sake I would need to provision my stack using
 baremetal driver (Not Ironic). But on the other hand I also need the
 network virtualization provided by neutron in order to maximize resource
 utilization. Therefore I started looking for SDN solutions for the
 baremetal use case. My network infrastructure is from Cisco and so I
 started with Cisco plugin within Neutron.

 According to [1], I found that the plugin pretty much supported all
 functionality for the virtualized VM case (i.e. dynamical VLAN creation and
 VLAN tag propagation from controller to compute host). But for baremetal
 case, it seems that the solution would not work as there is no OVS agent
 running on the BM node.

 Since information about baremetal + SDN is quit lacking so I wonder if
 anybody here has tried baremetal + SDN before and could share with me your
 experience in doing so? Or it is simply impossible to do SDN with baremetal
 driver? And how about the case for Ironic? Thanks.

 Regards,
 Tim

 Reference:
 [1] -
 http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/nexus-3000-series-switches/data_sheet_c78-727737.html

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Baremetal][Neutron] SDN Solution for Openstack Baremetal Driver

2014-05-28 Thread Kevin Benton
I'm not sure what the exact requirements are for this, but there is a spec
review under way for external attachment points into neutron networks.
It covers integration with ironic as well as other baremetal devices.

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/87825/

--
Kevin Benton
Ryota,

Thanks for your invitation. Unfortunately I did not join the summit. Wish
you had a good time and enjoy the summit ;). However I am really interested
in your baremetal + SDN solution. Would you mind elaborate a bit more about
the architecture and design of the solution?

Regards,
Tim

On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Tim Chim fsc...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi fellow stacker,

 I am designing for a Baremetal stack with SDN support recently and would
 like to seek for the help from you all for how to do so.

 I am building an automated testing framework on top of Openstack Havana.
 For performance and platform sake I would need to provision my stack using
 baremetal driver (Not Ironic). But on the other hand I also need the
 network virtualization provided by neutron in order to maximize resource
 utilization. Therefore I started looking for SDN solutions for the
 baremetal use case. My network infrastructure is from Cisco and so I
 started with Cisco plugin within Neutron.

 According to [1], I found that the plugin pretty much supported all
 functionality for the virtualized VM case (i.e. dynamical VLAN creation and
 VLAN tag propagation from controller to compute host). But for baremetal
 case, it seems that the solution would not work as there is no OVS agent
 running on the BM node.

 Since information about baremetal + SDN is quit lacking so I wonder if
 anybody here has tried baremetal + SDN before and could share with me your
 experience in doing so? Or it is simply impossible to do SDN with baremetal
 driver? And how about the case for Ironic? Thanks.

 Regards,
 Tim

 Reference:
 [1] -
 http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/nexus-3000-series-switches/data_sheet_c78-727737.html



___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [Baremetal][Neutron] SDN Solution for Openstack Baremetal Driver

2014-05-19 Thread Tim Chim
Ryota,

Thanks for your invitation. Unfortunately I did not join the summit. Wish
you had a good time and enjoy the summit ;). However I am really interested
in your baremetal + SDN solution. Would you mind elaborate a bit more about
the architecture and design of the solution?

Anthony,
Agree. I think currently the formal discussion  documentation on baremetal
networking (and especially baremetal + SDN) is lacking for production-scale
cases. As Ironic is coming to stable I think we would see more baremetal
type deployments. So could the baremetal  Ironic team/experienced stackers
consider improving the guide as suggested by Anthony? Really appreciate
that.

Again thanks a lot for Ryota and Anthony,

Regards,
Tim
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [Baremetal][Neutron] SDN Solution for Openstack Baremetal Driver

2014-05-16 Thread Tim Chim
Hi fellow stacker,

I am designing for a Baremetal stack with SDN support recently and would
like to seek for the help from you all for how to do so.

I am building an automated testing framework on top of Openstack Havana.
For performance and platform sake I would need to provision my stack using
baremetal driver (Not Ironic). But on the other hand I also need the
network virtualization provided by neutron in order to maximize resource
utilization. Therefore I started looking for SDN solutions for the
baremetal use case. My network infrastructure is from Cisco and so I
started with Cisco plugin within Neutron.

According to [1], I found that the plugin pretty much supported all
functionality for the virtualized VM case (i.e. dynamical VLAN creation and
VLAN tag propagation from controller to compute host). But for baremetal
case, it seems that the solution would not work as there is no OVS agent
running on the BM node.

Since information about baremetal + SDN is quit lacking so I wonder if
anybody here has tried baremetal + SDN before and could share with me your
experience in doing so? Or it is simply impossible to do SDN with baremetal
driver? And how about the case for Ironic? Thanks.

Regards,
Tim

Reference:
[1] -
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/nexus-3000-series-switches/data_sheet_c78-727737.html
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Baremetal][Neutron] SDN Solution for Openstack Baremetal Driver

2014-05-16 Thread Veiga, Anthony
This is a discussion that warrants a broader audience, as others are likely to 
have a very similar need.  It would be good to get something like this 
documented, and perhaps bolted on to the operators’ guide or somewhere 
similarly appropriate.
-Anthony

Hi Tim,

NTT-docomo and VTJ developed network isolation in baremetal before they merging 
baremetal driver to upstream, and I also supported them by providing 
SDN(OpenFlow) controller plugin. I don't have good article to explain that for 
now, but I can have discussion if you are in the summit.

Regards,
Ryota
​
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev