ent Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Third-Party CI Issue: direct access to
> review.openstack.org port 29418 required
>
> Hi Asselin,
>
> Do you had problems with other ports? Is it need to have outbound access to
> other ports?
&
June 13, 2014 4:03 AM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Third-Party CI Issue: direct
> access to review.openstack.org port 29418 required
>
>
>
> Hi Asselin,
>
>
>
> Do you had problems with othe
] Third-Party CI Issue: direct access to
review.openstack.org port 29418 required
Hi Asselin,
Do you had problems with other ports? Is it need to have outbound access to
other ports?
Erlon
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Asselin, Ramy
mailto:ramy.asse...@hp.com>> wrote:
All,
I’ve been w
Hi Asselin,
Do you had problems with other ports? Is it need to have outbound access to
other ports?
Erlon
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Asselin, Ramy wrote:
> All,
>
>
>
> I’ve been working on setting up our Cinder 3rd party CI setup.
>
> I ran into an issue where Zuul requires direct ac
All,
I've been working on setting up our Cinder 3rd party CI setup.
I ran into an issue where Zuul requires direct access to review.openstack.org
port 29418, which is currently blocked in my environment. It should be
unblocked around the end of June.
Since this will likely affect other vendors,
