On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 17:03 -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
I'd like to bring up the topic of drivers which, for one reason or
another, are probably never going to have third party CI testing.
Take for example the iBoot driver proposed here:
https://review.openstack.org/50977
I
Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 3:18:22 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] handling drivers that will not be
third-party tested
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes
lucasago...@gmail.com wrote
Thanks for putting this back on my radar
I think a separate directory to indicate these are contributed but less
tested drivers is a fair middle ground here, though time will tell how
much addtitional code-maintenance burden that places on developers. Since
this is just a power interface, I
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for putting this back on my radar
I think a separate directory to indicate these are contributed but less
tested drivers is a fair middle ground here, though time will tell how
much
of this.
Is there anyone out there who has done this and can comment on their experience?
Best wishes,
Stig Telfer
Cray
From: Devananda van der Veen [mailto:devananda@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 1:03 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] handling
- Original Message -
From: Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 3:18:22 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] handling drivers
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] handling drivers that will not be
third-party tested
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes
lucasago...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to bring up the topic
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to bring up the topic of drivers which, for one reason or another,
are probably never going to have third party CI testing.
Take for example the iBoot driver proposed here:
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 09:48 +0100, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to bring up the topic of drivers which, for one reason or another,
are probably never going to have third party CI testing.
Take
IMO the separated did in the project repo is a good approach (like
contrib dir in Heat).
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Dmitry Tantsur dtant...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 09:48 +0100, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Devananda van der Veen
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes
lucasago...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to bring up the topic of drivers which, for one reason or
another,
are probably never going to have third party
Linux has a very different model then OpenStack does, the article you
mention is talking about a whole separate git repo, along with a separate
(re: just OR, not exclusive or) set of maintainers. If you leave these
drivers in a staging directory would you still require two cores for the
code
- Original Message -
From: Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 8:03:15 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] handling drivers that will not be
third-party tested
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com
[...]
interface. However, I also don't expect the author to provide a full
third-party CI environment, and as such, we should not claim
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes
lucasago...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to bring up the topic of drivers which, for one reason or another,
are probably never going to have third party CI
I'd like to bring up the topic of drivers which, for one reason or another,
are probably never going to have third party CI testing.
Take for example the iBoot driver proposed here:
https://review.openstack.org/50977
I would like to encourage this type of driver as it enables individual
+1 for community contribs and a common place for them to be sourced.
From: Devananda van der Veen [mailto:devananda@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 5:03 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] handling drivers that will not be third-party
tested
17 matches
Mail list logo
