ly a database migration, right?
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Eichberger, German [mailto:german.eichber...@hpe.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 12:28 AM
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removin
tions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
Hi Kevin,
Floating IP will work in V2 as well :-)
Thanks,
German
On 3/7/16, 2:47 PM, "Fox, Kevin M" wrote:
>You can attach a floating ip onto a vip. Thats what we've done to work around
>
r usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
>
>Hi Sam,
>
>So if you have some 3rd party hardware you only need to change the
>database (your steps 1-5) since the 3rd party hardware will just keep
>load balancing…
>
>Now f
tion for mapping between v1 and v2
>models)
>
>What do you think?
>
>-Sam.
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Fox, Kevin M [mailto:kevin@pnnl.gov]
>Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 2:06 AM
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
if a smooth migration is required.
Thanks,
Vijay V.
-Original Message-
From: Eichberger, German [mailto:german.eichber...@hpe.com]
Sent: 08 March 2016 00:00
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are
v2.
>
>Thanks,
>Kevin
>
>From: Samuel Bercovici [samu...@radware.com]
>Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 11:00 AM
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
>
Kevin
From: Eichberger, German [german.eichber...@hpe.com]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 2:27 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
Ok, for what it’s worth we have contributed our migration s
Stack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
As far as I recall, you can specify the VIP in creating the LB so you will end
up with same IPs.
-Original Message-
From: Eichberger, German [mailto:german.ei
t;>-Sam.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-
>>From: Fox, Kevin M [mailto:kevin@pnnl.gov]
>>Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 2:06 AM
>>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neu
: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
Hi Sam,
So if you have some 3rd party hardware you only need to change the database
(your steps 1-5) since the 3rd party hardware will just keep load balancing…
Now for Kevin’s case with the namespace driver:
You would need a
gt;between v1 and v2 models)
>
>What do you think?
>
>-Sam.
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Fox, Kevin M [mailto:kevin@pnnl.gov]
>Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 2:06 AM
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [op
vin@pnnl.gov]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 2:06 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
Ok. Thanks for the info.
Kevin
From: Brandon Logan [brandon
Ok. Thanks for the info.
Kevin
From: Brandon Logan [brandon.lo...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:42 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
Just for clarity
gt; Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 12:47 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
>
> Kevin,
>
> If we are offering a migration tool it would be namespace -> namespace
__
From: Eichberger, German [german.eichber...@hpe.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 12:47 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
Kevin,
If we are offering a m
for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
no removal without an upgrade path. I've got v1 LB's and there still isn't a
migration script to go from v1 to v2.
Thanks,
Ke
iling List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
I am also on-board with removing LBaaS v1 as early as possible in the Newton
cycle.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Samuel Bercovici
mailto:samu...@radware.com>> wrote:
T
es sense to remove LBaaS v1 in Newton.
>
> Do we want do discuss an upgrade process in the summit?
>
>
>
> -Sam.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Bryan Jones [mailto:jone...@us.ibm.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:54 PM
> *To:* openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
02, 2016 5:54 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?
And as for the Heat support, the resources have made Mitaka, with additional
functional tests on the way soon.
blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat
And as for the Heat support, the resources have made Mitaka, with additional functional tests on the way soon.
blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/lbaasv2-suport
gerrit topic: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/lbaasv2-suport
BRYAN M. JONES
Software Engineer - OpenStack
20 matches
Mail list logo
