Mark Voelker wrote:
On Jun 1, 2016, at 12:27 PM, Armando M. wrote:
[...]
To the best of my knowledge none of the *-aas projects are part of defcore, and
since [1] has no presence of vpn, fw, lb, nor planned, I thought I was on the
safe side.
Thanks for checking. You are correct: LBaaS, VPNa
> On Jun 1, 2016, at 12:27 PM, Armando M. wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1 June 2016 at 02:28, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Armando M. wrote:
> Having looked at the recent commit volume that has been going into the
> *-aas repos, I am considering changing the release model for
> neutron-vpnaas, neutron-fwaas,
On 1 June 2016 at 02:28, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Armando M. wrote:
>
>> Having looked at the recent commit volume that has been going into the
>> *-aas repos, I am considering changing the release model for
>> neutron-vpnaas, neutron-fwaas, neutron-lbaas
>> from release:cycle-with-milestones [1]
Armando M. wrote:
Having looked at the recent commit volume that has been going into the
*-aas repos, I am considering changing the release model for
neutron-vpnaas, neutron-fwaas, neutron-lbaas
from release:cycle-with-milestones [1] to
release:cycle-with-intermediary [2]. This change will allow
Agreed.
doug
> On May 31, 2016, at 12:12 PM, Armando M. wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Having looked at the recent commit volume that has been going into the *-aas
> repos, I am considering changing the release model for neutron-vpnaas,
> neutron-fwaas, neutron-lbaas from release:cycle-with-milest
"Armando M." wrote on 05/31/2016 01:12:32 PM:
> From: "Armando M."
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Date: 05/31/2016 01:13 PM
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Release] Changing release model
> for *
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Armando M. wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Having looked at the recent commit volume that has been going into the *-aas
> repos, I am considering changing the release model for neutron-vpnaas,
> neutron-fwaas, neutron-lbaas from release:cycle-with-milestones [1] to
> releas
On 31 May 2016 at 11:17, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
> > On 31 May 2016, at 20:12, Armando M. wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Having looked at the recent commit volume that has been going into the
> *-aas repos, I am considering changing the release model for
> neutron-vpnaas, neutron-fwaas, neutr
> On 31 May 2016, at 20:12, Armando M. wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Having looked at the recent commit volume that has been going into the *-aas
> repos, I am considering changing the release model for neutron-vpnaas,
> neutron-fwaas, neutron-lbaas from release:cycle-with-milestones [1] to
> rel
Hi folks,
Having looked at the recent commit volume that has been going into the
*-aas repos, I am considering changing the release model for
neutron-vpnaas, neutron-fwaas, neutron-lbaas
from release:cycle-with-milestones [1] to release:cycle-with-intermediary
[2]. This change will allow us to avo
10 matches
Mail list logo
