: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] What are problems of Distributed
SNAT?
On 07/24/2015 08:17 AM, Miyagishi, Takanori wrote:
Dear Carl,
Thank you for your information!
I checked the etherpad, and I propose a new idea of Distributed SNAT
implementation.
Following figure is my idea, Shared SNAT
to implement SNAT for Liberty cycle with this idea.
Best regards,
Takanori Miyagishi
-Original Message-
From: Carl Baldwin [mailto:c...@ecbaldwin.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 2:29 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] What
Message-
From: Carl Baldwin [mailto:c...@ecbaldwin.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 2:29 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] What are problems of Distributed
SNAT?
Hi,
There was some discussion a while back
Hi,
There was some discussion a while back on this subject. Some
alternatives were captured on etherpad [1] with pros and cons. Sorry
for the delay in responding. The initial implementation of DVR went
with centralized SNAT to reduce the scope of the effort and because of
a lack consensus
Hi all,
I'm Takanori Miyagishi.
I and Yushiro Furukawa, my co-worker, are planning to implement Distributed
SNAT in Liberty cycle.
So, I looking for information about Distributed SNAT implementation.
For now, I got some information from openstack-dev ML[1][2][3] and etherpad[4].
Would you please
