There is a good talk happening today at 2pm @ room B.206 in a Breakout
session :
"Divide and conquer: Resource Segregation in OpenStack"
(I'm sorry, I can't provide the sched.org link, site seems to be down)
-Sylvain
Le 13/05/2014 11:12, Meghal Gosalia a écrit :
> Is any discussion on this topi
Is any discussion on this topic scheduled during the summit ?
Thanks,
Meghal
On Apr 9, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Sylvain Bauza
mailto:sylvain.ba...@gmail.com>> wrote:
2014-04-07 23:11 GMT+02:00 Sylvain Bauza
mailto:sylvain.ba...@gmail.com>>:
Hi Phil,
2014-04-07 18:48 GMT+02:00 Day, Phil
mailto:
- Original Message -
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@windriver.com]
> > Sent: 09 April 2014 15:37
> > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hosts within two Availabili
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@windriver.com]
> Sent: 09 April 2014 15:37
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hosts within two Availability Zones :
> possible or not ?
>
> On 04/09/2014 0
2014-04-07 23:11 GMT+02:00 Sylvain Bauza :
> Hi Phil,
>
>
>
> 2014-04-07 18:48 GMT+02:00 Day, Phil :
>
> Hi Sylvain,
>>
>>
>>
>> There was a similar thread on this recently - which might be worth
>> reviewing:
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/031006.html
>>
>>
>>
On 04/09/2014 03:55 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
I would guess that affinity is more likely to be a soft requirement
that anti-affinity, in that I can see some services just not meeting
their HA goals without anti-affinity but I'm struggling to think of a
use case why affinity is a must for the service
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@windriver.com]
> Sent: 08 April 2014 15:19
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hosts within two Availability Zones :
> possible or not ?
>
> On 04/08/2014 0
> -Original Message-
> From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 08 April 2014 14:25
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hosts within two Availability Zones :
> possible or not ?
>
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 10:4
On 04/08/2014 07:25 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 10:49 +, Day, Phil wrote:
On a large cloud you’re protect against this to some extent if the
number of servers is >> number of instances in the quota.
However it does feel that there are a couple of things missing to
really prov
- Original Message -
> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 10:49 +, Day, Phil wrote:
> > On a large cloud you’re protect against this to some extent if the
> > number of servers is >> number of instances in the quota.
> >
> > However it does feel that there are a couple of things missing to
> > real
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : mardi 8 avril 2014 15:25
> À : openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Objet : Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hosts within two Availability Zones :
> possible
> or not ?
>
> On Tue
of anti-affinity) instances that meet the affinity criteria.
Best,
-jay
> From: Khanh-Toan Tran [mailto:khanh-toan.t...@cloudwatt.com]
> Sent: 08 April 2014 11:32
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hosts with
for user.
De : Ian Wells [mailto:ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk]
Envoyé : mardi 8 avril 2014 01:02
À : OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Objet : Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hosts within two Availability Zones :
possible or not ?
On 3 April 2014 08:21, Khanh-Toan Tran
mailto:kha
01:02
À : OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Objet : Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hosts within two Availability Zones :
possible or not ?
On 3 April 2014 08:21, Khanh-Toan Tran
wrote:
Otherwise we cannot provide redundancy to client except using Region which
is dedicated
On 3 April 2014 08:21, Khanh-Toan Tran wrote:
> Otherwise we cannot provide redundancy to client except using Region which
> is dedicated infrastructure and networked separated and anti-affinity
> filter which IMO is not pragmatic as it has tendency of abusive usage.
>
I'm sorry, could you explai
for me they suggest we should develop a better concept rather
> than bend the meaning of the old one. We certainly don't have hosts in more
> than one AZ in HP Cloud and I think some of our users would be very
> surprised if we changed that.
>
>
>
> Paul.
>
>
>
On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 16:48 +, Day, Phil wrote:
> Hi Sylvain,
>
> There was a similar thread on this recently – which might be worth
> reviewing:
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/031006.html
>
> Some interesting use cases were posted, and a I don’t think a
> co
ut not
within a set) might be useful.
Phil
From: Murray, Paul (HP Cloud Services)
Sent: 03 April 2014 16:34
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hosts within two Availability Zones :
possible or not ?
Hi Sylvain,
I would go with k
I am fine with taking the approach of user passing multiple avail. zones
Az1,Az2 if he wants vm to be in (intersection of AZ1 and Az2).
It will be more cleaner.
But, similar approach should also be used while setting the
default_scheduling_zone.
Since, we will not be able to add host to multipl
2014-04-04 10:30 GMT+02:00 Sylvain Bauza :
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> 2014-04-03 18:47 GMT+02:00 Meghal Gosalia :
>
> Hello folks,
>>
>> Here is the bug [1] which is currently not allowing a host to be part
>> of two availability zones.
>> This bug was targeted for havana.
>>
>> The fix in the bug was m
Hi all,
2014-04-03 18:47 GMT+02:00 Meghal Gosalia :
> Hello folks,
>
> Here is the bug [1] which is currently not allowing a host to be part of
> two availability zones.
> This bug was targeted for havana.
>
> The fix in the bug was made because it was assumed
> that openstack does not suppo
Hello folks,
Here is the bug [1] which is currently not allowing a host to be part of two
availability zones.
This bug was targeted for havana.
The fix in the bug was made because it was assumed
that openstack does not support adding hosts to two zones by design.
The assumption was based on the
- Original Message -
> Currently host aggregates are quite general, but the only ways for an
> end-user to make use of them are:
>
> 1) By making the host aggregate an availability zones (where each host
> is only supposed to be in one availability zone) and selecting it at
> instance cr
On 04/03/2014 09:34 AM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud Services) wrote:
Hi Sylvain,
I would go with keeping AZs exclusive. It is a well-established concept
even if it is up to providers to implement what it actually means in
terms of isolation. Some good use cases have been presented on this
topic recen
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently trying to reproduce [1]. This bug requires to have the same
> host on two different aggregates, each one having an AZ.
>
> IIRC, Nova API prevents hosts of being part of two distinct AZs [2], so
> IMHO this request should not be possible.
> Tha
Stack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hosts within two Availability Zones :
possible or not ?
+1 for AZs not sharing hosts.
Because it's the only mechanism that allows us to segment the datacenter.
Otherwise we cannot provide redundancy to cli
udi 3 avril 2014 17:22
> À : OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Objet : RE: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hosts within two Availability Zones :
possible
> or not ?
>
> +1 for AZs not sharing hosts.
>
> Because its the only mechanism that allows us to segmen
;origine-
> De : Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@windriver.com]
> Envoyé : jeudi 3 avril 2014 16:51
> À : openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Objet : Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hosts within two Availability Zones :
possible
> or not ?
>
> On 04/03/2014 07:51 AM
é : jeudi 3 avril 2014 15:52
À : OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Objet : [openstack-dev] [Nova] Hosts within two Availability Zones :
possible or not ?
Hi,
I'm currently trying to reproduce [1]. This bug requires to have the same
host on two different aggrega
On 04/03/2014 07:51 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently trying to reproduce [1]. This bug requires to have the
same host on two different aggregates, each one having an AZ.
IIRC, Nova API prevents hosts of being part of two distinct AZs [2], so
IMHO this request should not be possible.
T
Hi,
I'm currently trying to reproduce [1]. This bug requires to have the same
host on two different aggregates, each one having an AZ.
IIRC, Nova API prevents hosts of being part of two distinct AZs [2], so
IMHO this request should not be possible.
That said, there are two flaws where I can ident
31 matches
Mail list logo
