On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:14:24PM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
> I've proposed:
> https://review.openstack.org/353019
>
> which makes gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-nonha-multinode-nv and
> gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-nv become voting jobs.
>
> I think these jobs have proven to be stable enough
Hi James,
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:43:58PM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Michele Baldessari wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:14:24PM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
> >> I've proposed:
> >> https://review.openstack.org/353019
> >>
> >> which makes gate-tripleo-ci-
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:14:24PM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
> I've proposed:
> https://review.openstack.org/353019
>
> which makes gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-nonha-multinode-nv and
> gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-nv become voting jobs.
>
> I think these jobs have proven to be stable enough
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Michele Baldessari wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:14:24PM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
>> I've proposed:
>> https://review.openstack.org/353019
>>
>> which makes gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-nonha-multinode-nv and
>> gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:14 PM, James Slagle wrote:
> I've proposed:
> https://review.openstack.org/353019
>
> which makes gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-nonha-multinode-nv and
> gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-nv become voting jobs.
>
> I think these jobs have proven to be stable enough that we can
Hi James,
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:14:24PM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
> I've proposed:
> https://review.openstack.org/353019
>
> which makes gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-nonha-multinode-nv and
> gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-nv become voting jobs.
definitely +1 for the gate-tripleo-ci-centos
I've proposed:
https://review.openstack.org/353019
which makes gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-nonha-multinode-nv and
gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-nv become voting jobs.
I think these jobs have proven to be stable enough that we can promote
them to be voting. If you have concerns, please vote on