Excerpts from Tomas Sedovic's message of 2014-10-14 08:55:30 +:
> James Slagle proposed something like this when I talked to him on IRC:
>
> 1. teach devtest about the new templates, driven by a
> OVERCLOUD_USE_MERGE_PY switch (defaulting to the merge.py-based templates)
> 2. Do a CI run of t
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 01:27:20PM +0200, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
> On 10/14/2014 12:43 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:55:30AM +0200, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
> >>Hi everyone,
> >>
> >>As outlined in the "Remove merge.py"[1] spec, Peter Belanyi and I have built
> >>the templates for
On 10/14/2014 04:55 AM, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
Hi everyone,
As outlined in the "Remove merge.py"[1] spec, Peter Belanyi and I have
built the templates for controller, nova compute, swift and cinder nodes
that can be deploying directly to Heat (i.e. no merge.py pass is
necessary).
The patches:
On 10/14/2014 12:43 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:55:30AM +0200, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
Hi everyone,
As outlined in the "Remove merge.py"[1] spec, Peter Belanyi and I have built
the templates for controller, nova compute, swift and cinder nodes that can
be deploying directly
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:55:30AM +0200, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As outlined in the "Remove merge.py"[1] spec, Peter Belanyi and I have built
> the templates for controller, nova compute, swift and cinder nodes that can
> be deploying directly to Heat (i.e. no merge.py pass is nec
Hi everyone,
As outlined in the "Remove merge.py"[1] spec, Peter Belanyi and I have
built the templates for controller, nova compute, swift and cinder nodes
that can be deploying directly to Heat (i.e. no merge.py pass is necessary).
The patches:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/123100/
http
