Our "TripleO" undercloud only requires a subset of the available
services that we run int the Overcloud. So ironic, heat, mistral,
zaqar, keystone, nova, swift, glance, neutron. These would mostly
satisfy our needs.
What I find interesting here is that there isn't much mention of
jenkins,
kady
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Prince [mailto:dpri...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 6:35 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install
> driven by Heat
>
>
On 08/05/2016 01:21 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to
install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the
ailto:dpri...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 6:35 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 12:27 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan
..@redhat.com>
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 7:34:32 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat
Lastly, there is container work ongoing for the Over
Well, except for you need some non-openstack starting point, because unlike
with e.g. ansible installing any openstack service(s) does not end at "dnf
install ".
You might like to watch Dan's demo again.
It goes something like:
yum install python-tripleoclient
openstack undercloud deploy
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 13:56 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> On 08/05/2016 01:21 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> > >
> > > On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Last week I started some prototype work on what
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 01:56:32PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> On 08/05/2016 01:21 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> > > On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
> > > > Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> Ideally, I would love to see:
>
> for node in nodes:
>ssh $node puppet apply blah-blah
>
> Maybe we're not there, but it only means we have to improve our puppet
> modules.
This is the same thought I had,
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 13:39 +0200, Thomas Herve wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Dan Prince
> wrote:
> >
> > Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way
> > to
> > install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of
> > the
> >
On 08/05/2016 01:34 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 12:27 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way
to
install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of
the
recent
On 08/05/2016 01:21 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to
install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
> Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to
> install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the
> recent "composable services" work we've done in TripleO so initially I
> called
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 12:27 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
> >
> > Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way
> > to
> > install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of
> > the
> > recent "composable services"
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
> > Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to
> > install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the
> > recent "composable services" work
On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to
install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the
recent "composable services" work we've done in TripleO so initially I
called in composable undercloud. There is
Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to
install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the
recent "composable services" work we've done in TripleO so initially I
called in composable undercloud. There is an etherpad here with links
to some of the
17 matches
Mail list logo