On 2015-07-06 06:48:09 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote:
[...]
> Realize, this is a much larger effort to teach python installation tools
> about more than LIB and BIN, which is all they understand today.
There was a recentish thread on distutils-sig which felt like it was
headed in the right direc
gt;> From: Perry, Sean
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 4:04 PM
>>>>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>> Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [all][packaging] Adding files to /etc in a
>>>>> package
>>
t;>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>> Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [all][packaging] Adding files to /etc in a
>>>> package
>>>>
>>>> According to Debian standards (which Ubuntu follows mostly) if a package
istro look at the debhelper tools source (which
>>> is perl).
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Perry, Sean
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 4:04 PM
>>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 03:26:41AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Use the source, luke! Or write yourself a small shell script...
I have, and I'm pretty sure that's where this conversation started.
> If you attempt to address this, you're making my life miserable. Please
> don't do it, thanks.
.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Perry, Sean
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 4:04 PM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [all][packaging] Adding files to /etc in a
>> package
>&
On 07/02/2015 12:26 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:33:03PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> The file has nothing to do in /usr/share/doc either. By per the debian
>> policy manual: we shouldn't rely on /usr/share/doc, as it can be removed
>> entirely by the users. /usr/share/
On 07/02/2015 01:03 AM, Perry, Sean wrote:
> According to Debian standards (which Ubuntu follows mostly) if
> a package ships bash completion information that file belongs in
> /etc/bash_completion.d with a file named after the package.
This is no longer the case. Now it's:
/usr/share/bash-complet
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Breeds [mailto:t...@bakeyournoodle.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 5:08 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][packaging] Adding files to /etc in a
> package
&
erry, Sean
> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 4:04 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [all][packaging] Adding files to /etc in a
> package
>
> According to Debian standards (which Ubuntu follows mostly) if a package
> ship
usage questions)
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [all][packaging] Adding files to /etc in a package
According to Debian standards (which Ubuntu follows mostly) if a package ships
bash completion information that file belongs in /etc/bash_completion.d with a
file named after the package. You can look
Breeds [mailto:t...@bakeyournoodle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 3:26 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][packaging] Adding files to /etc in a package
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:33:03PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:33:03PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> The file has nothing to do in /usr/share/doc either. By per the debian
> policy manual: we shouldn't rely on /usr/share/doc, as it can be removed
> entirely by the users. /usr/share/python-novaclient could be a place,
> but really,
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:28:06PM +, Ian Cordasco wrote:
> So for people using the clients to talk to arbitrary clouds from their
> personal computer (that can be running more than just linux) we need to
> fix this. The problem is that if the person is installing a wheel or using
> a new enou
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 02:13:50PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2015-07-01 12:08:46 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote:
> > Okay so I take you point no problem, but I'm not running distro
> > packages and I still want completions. There must be a way to
> > package the file to at least make it e
On 7/1/15, 09:13, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote:
>On 2015-07-01 12:08:46 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote:
>> Okay so I take you point no problem, but I'm not running distro
>> packages and I still want completions. There must be a way to
>> package the file to at least make it easier to achieve both
On 2015-07-01 12:08:46 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote:
> Okay so I take you point no problem, but I'm not running distro
> packages and I still want completions. There must be a way to
> package the file to at least make it easier to achieve both our
> goals.
[...]
http://docs.openstack.org/deve
On 07/01/2015 04:08 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:55:53AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> Please don't do this. This is the kind of job to be done by package
>> maintainers in distribution, because mostly, Python maintainers wouldn't
>> know how to do things correctly. Here
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:55:53AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Please don't do this. This is the kind of job to be done by package
> maintainers in distribution, because mostly, Python maintainers wouldn't
> know how to do things correctly. Here we've got a good example: the bash
> completion s
On 07/01/2015 03:26 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'm pretty new to this but I'll ask anyway. python-novaclient contains a
> bash completion script . When installed from pypi this script isn't packaged
> (and therefore it isn't installed).
>
> I created https://review.openstack.org/#/c/
Hi All,
I'm pretty new to this but I'll ask anyway. python-novaclient contains a
bash completion script . When installed from pypi this script isn't packaged
(and therefore it isn't installed).
I created https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196919/ to gather feedback on:
a) this this a thing we
21 matches
Mail list logo
