Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Wiki (was: How to deal with confusion around "hosted projects")

2017-07-03 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 03/07/17 11:04 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2017-07-03 16:11:44 +0200: On 03/07/17 13:58 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: >Flavio Percoco wrote: >> Sometimes I wonder if we still need to maintain a Wiki. I guess some >> projects still use it but I wonder

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Wiki (was: How to deal with confusion around "hosted projects")

2017-07-03 Thread Melvin Hillsman
Additionally there are non-project folks who use the wiki - Working Groups / UC Teams / SIGs (potentially) - so I also request not making the wiki read-only. On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2017-07-03

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Wiki (was: How to deal with confusion around "hosted projects")

2017-07-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2017-07-03 16:11:44 +0200: > On 03/07/17 13:58 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > >Flavio Percoco wrote: > >> Sometimes I wonder if we still need to maintain a Wiki. I guess some > >> projects still use it but I wonder if the use they make of the Wiki could >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Wiki (was: How to deal with confusion around "hosted projects")

2017-07-03 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 03/07/17 13:58 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Flavio Percoco wrote: Sometimes I wonder if we still need to maintain a Wiki. I guess some projects still use it but I wonder if the use they make of the Wiki could be moved somewhere else. For example, in the TC we use it for the Agenda but I

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Wiki (was: How to deal with confusion around "hosted projects")

2017-07-03 Thread Thierry Carrez
Flavio Percoco wrote: > Sometimes I wonder if we still need to maintain a Wiki. I guess some > projects still use it but I wonder if the use they make of the Wiki could be > moved > somewhere else. > > For example, in the TC we use it for the Agenda but I think that could be > moved > to an