Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] [glance] [ironic] [neutron] [tacker] [tc] policy in code goal

2018-01-31 Thread Lance Bragstad 


On 01/31/2018 11:50 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote:
> Lance,
>
> that's a single patch renaming the sample policy file from .json to
> .yaml, so I do not think it is a real blocker.
> Besides we have another patch on review that deletes those files
> altogether (and which I like more and there was an ML thread resulting
> in a decision to indeed remove them).
>
> I'll ask the patch owner to abandon it.
Thanks for following up. I just wanted to make sure we we're missing
something. Once that patch is abandoned, the list should automatically
update and ironic will be removed from that list.
>
> Cheers,
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:23 PM, Lance Bragstad  > wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/31/2018 11:20 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On 01/31/2018 06:16 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> >> Hey folks,
> >>
> >> The tracking tool for the policy-and-docs-in-code goal for
> Queens [0]
> >> lists a couple projects remaining for the goal [1].  I wanted
> to start a
> >> discussion with said projects to see how we want to go about
> the work in
> >> the future, we have a couple of options.
> >
> > I was under assumption that ironic has finished this goal. I'll wait
> > for pas-ha to weigh in, but I was not planning any activities
> for it.
> It looks like there is still an unmerged patch tagged with the
> policy-and-docs-in-code topic [0].
>
> [0]
> 
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/is:open+topic:policy-and-docs-in-code+project:openstack/ironic
> 
> 
> >
> >>
> >> I can update the document the goal document saying the work is
> still
> >> underway for those projects. We can also set aside time at the
> PTG to
> >> finish up that work if people would like more help. This might be
> >> something we can leverage the baremetal/vm room for if we get
> enough
> >> interest [2].
> >
> > Mmm, the scope of the bm/vm room is already unclear to me, this may
> > add to the confusion. Maybe just a "Goals workroom"?
> >
> >>
> >> I want to get the discussion rolling if there is something we
> need to
> >> coordinate for the PTG. Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Lance
> >>
> >>
> >> [0]
> https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/queens/policy-in-code.html
> 
> >> [1] https://www.lbragstad.com/policy-burndown/
> 
> >> [2]
> >>
> 
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126743.html
> 
> 
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> __
> >>
> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> Unsubscribe:
> >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> 
> >>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> __
> >
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> 
> >
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> 
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Dr. Pavlo Shchelokovskyy
> Senior Software Engineer
> Mirantis Inc
> www.mirantis.com 
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubsc

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] [glance] [ironic] [neutron] [tacker] [tc] policy in code goal

2018-01-31 Thread Mathieu Gagné 
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Lance Bragstad  wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> The tracking tool for the policy-and-docs-in-code goal for Queens [0]
> lists a couple projects remaining for the goal [1].  I wanted to start a
> discussion with said projects to see how we want to go about the work in
> the future, we have a couple of options.
>
> I can update the document the goal document saying the work is still
> underway for those projects. We can also set aside time at the PTG to
> finish up that work if people would like more help. This might be
> something we can leverage the baremetal/vm room for if we get enough
> interest [2].
>
> I want to get the discussion rolling if there is something we need to
> coordinate for the PTG. Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lance
>

As an operator, I can't wait for Glance and Neutron to complete this goal.
The policy is code is *very* useful when you do heavy work in policy.
Thanks to all working toward that goal.

--
Mathieu

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] [glance] [ironic] [neutron] [tacker] [tc] policy in code goal

2018-01-31 Thread Pavlo Shchelokovskyy 
Lance,

that's a single patch renaming the sample policy file from .json to .yaml,
so I do not think it is a real blocker.
Besides we have another patch on review that deletes those files altogether
(and which I like more and there was an ML thread resulting in a decision
to indeed remove them).

I'll ask the patch owner to abandon it.

Cheers,

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:23 PM, Lance Bragstad  wrote:

>
>
> On 01/31/2018 11:20 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On 01/31/2018 06:16 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> >> Hey folks,
> >>
> >> The tracking tool for the policy-and-docs-in-code goal for Queens [0]
> >> lists a couple projects remaining for the goal [1].  I wanted to start a
> >> discussion with said projects to see how we want to go about the work in
> >> the future, we have a couple of options.
> >
> > I was under assumption that ironic has finished this goal. I'll wait
> > for pas-ha to weigh in, but I was not planning any activities for it.
> It looks like there is still an unmerged patch tagged with the
> policy-and-docs-in-code topic [0].
>
> [0]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/is:open+topic:policy-and-
> docs-in-code+project:openstack/ironic
> >
> >>
> >> I can update the document the goal document saying the work is still
> >> underway for those projects. We can also set aside time at the PTG to
> >> finish up that work if people would like more help. This might be
> >> something we can leverage the baremetal/vm room for if we get enough
> >> interest [2].
> >
> > Mmm, the scope of the bm/vm room is already unclear to me, this may
> > add to the confusion. Maybe just a "Goals workroom"?
> >
> >>
> >> I want to get the discussion rolling if there is something we need to
> >> coordinate for the PTG. Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Lance
> >>
> >>
> >> [0] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/queens/policy-in-
> code.html
> >> [1] https://www.lbragstad.com/policy-burndown/
> >> [2]
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-
> January/126743.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 
> __
> >>
> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> Unsubscribe:
> >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>
> >
> >
> > 
> __
> >
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Dr. Pavlo Shchelokovskyy
Senior Software Engineer
Mirantis Inc
www.mirantis.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] [glance] [ironic] [neutron] [tacker] [tc] policy in code goal

2018-01-31 Thread Dmitry Tantsur 

On 01/31/2018 06:23 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:



On 01/31/2018 11:20 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:

Hi!

On 01/31/2018 06:16 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:

Hey folks,

The tracking tool for the policy-and-docs-in-code goal for Queens [0]
lists a couple projects remaining for the goal [1].  I wanted to start a
discussion with said projects to see how we want to go about the work in
the future, we have a couple of options.


I was under assumption that ironic has finished this goal. I'll wait
for pas-ha to weigh in, but I was not planning any activities for it.

It looks like there is still an unmerged patch tagged with the
policy-and-docs-in-code topic [0].

[0]
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/is:open+topic:policy-and-docs-in-code+project:openstack/ironic


But is it required? We've marked the goal as done already, and pas-ha is no 
longer working on it AFAIK.






I can update the document the goal document saying the work is still
underway for those projects. We can also set aside time at the PTG to
finish up that work if people would like more help. This might be
something we can leverage the baremetal/vm room for if we get enough
interest [2].


Mmm, the scope of the bm/vm room is already unclear to me, this may
add to the confusion. Maybe just a "Goals workroom"?



I want to get the discussion rolling if there is something we need to
coordinate for the PTG. Thoughts?

Thanks,

Lance


[0] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/queens/policy-in-code.html
[1] https://www.lbragstad.com/policy-burndown/
[2]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126743.html





__

OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




__

OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev





__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] [glance] [ironic] [neutron] [tacker] [tc] policy in code goal

2018-01-31 Thread Lance Bragstad 


On 01/31/2018 11:20 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 01/31/2018 06:16 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> The tracking tool for the policy-and-docs-in-code goal for Queens [0]
>> lists a couple projects remaining for the goal [1].  I wanted to start a
>> discussion with said projects to see how we want to go about the work in
>> the future, we have a couple of options.
>
> I was under assumption that ironic has finished this goal. I'll wait
> for pas-ha to weigh in, but I was not planning any activities for it.
It looks like there is still an unmerged patch tagged with the
policy-and-docs-in-code topic [0].

[0]
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/is:open+topic:policy-and-docs-in-code+project:openstack/ironic
>
>>
>> I can update the document the goal document saying the work is still
>> underway for those projects. We can also set aside time at the PTG to
>> finish up that work if people would like more help. This might be
>> something we can leverage the baremetal/vm room for if we get enough
>> interest [2].
>
> Mmm, the scope of the bm/vm room is already unclear to me, this may
> add to the confusion. Maybe just a "Goals workroom"?
>
>>
>> I want to get the discussion rolling if there is something we need to
>> coordinate for the PTG. Thoughts?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Lance
>>
>>
>> [0] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/queens/policy-in-code.html
>> [1] https://www.lbragstad.com/policy-burndown/
>> [2]
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126743.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __
>>
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> __
>
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] [glance] [ironic] [neutron] [tacker] [tc] policy in code goal

2018-01-31 Thread Dmitry Tantsur 

Hi!

On 01/31/2018 06:16 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:

Hey folks,

The tracking tool for the policy-and-docs-in-code goal for Queens [0]
lists a couple projects remaining for the goal [1].  I wanted to start a
discussion with said projects to see how we want to go about the work in
the future, we have a couple of options.


I was under assumption that ironic has finished this goal. I'll wait for pas-ha 
to weigh in, but I was not planning any activities for it.




I can update the document the goal document saying the work is still
underway for those projects. We can also set aside time at the PTG to
finish up that work if people would like more help. This might be
something we can leverage the baremetal/vm room for if we get enough
interest [2].


Mmm, the scope of the bm/vm room is already unclear to me, this may add to the 
confusion. Maybe just a "Goals workroom"?




I want to get the discussion rolling if there is something we need to
coordinate for the PTG. Thoughts?

Thanks,

Lance


[0] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/queens/policy-in-code.html
[1] https://www.lbragstad.com/policy-burndown/
[2]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126743.html




__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [barbican] [glance] [ironic] [neutron] [tacker] [tc] policy in code goal

2018-01-31 Thread Lance Bragstad 
Hey folks,

The tracking tool for the policy-and-docs-in-code goal for Queens [0]
lists a couple projects remaining for the goal [1].  I wanted to start a
discussion with said projects to see how we want to go about the work in
the future, we have a couple of options.

I can update the document the goal document saying the work is still
underway for those projects. We can also set aside time at the PTG to
finish up that work if people would like more help. This might be
something we can leverage the baremetal/vm room for if we get enough
interest [2].

I want to get the discussion rolling if there is something we need to
coordinate for the PTG. Thoughts?

Thanks,

Lance


[0] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/queens/policy-in-code.html
[1] https://www.lbragstad.com/policy-burndown/
[2]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126743.html




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev