Monty Taylor wrote:
On 08/15/2016 02:47 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
With nodepool and Zuul, there's simply no purpose to Jenkins any more
for me.
Fair point, and no disagreement on that effort being good and all;
though I can't quite say what companies that do use jenkins (the
majority?) are
Sure, I get your point. Disagree that it's not a worthy effort to want
to rid the world of impossible-to-reason-about CI configurations, but I
get your point.
I'm more of in disagreement that running two systems that are sorta
similar is worthy (2 things to maintain, support, operate...),
On 08/15/2016 03:47 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
I've been experimenting/investigating/playing around with the 'new'
jenkins pipeline support (see https://jenkins.io/doc/pipeline/ for those
who don't know what this is) and it got me thinking that there are
probably X other
On 08/15/2016 02:47 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
>> With nodepool and Zuul, there's simply no purpose to Jenkins any more
>> for me.
>
> Fair point, and no disagreement on that effort being good and all;
> though I can't quite say what companies that do use jenkins (the
> majority?) are supposed to
I've been experimenting/investigating/playing around with the 'new'
jenkins pipeline support (see https://jenkins.io/doc/pipeline/ for those
who don't know what this is) and it got me thinking that there are
probably X other people/groups/companies that are doing the same thing
and that to me
On 08/15/2016 01:19 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Hi folks,
I've been experimenting/investigating/playing around with the 'new'
jenkins pipeline support (see https://jenkins.io/doc/pipeline/ for those
who don't know what this is) and it got me thinking that there are
probably X other
Hi folks,
I've been experimenting/investigating/playing around with the 'new'
jenkins pipeline support (see https://jenkins.io/doc/pipeline/ for those
who don't know what this is) and it got me thinking that there are
probably X other people/groups/companies that are doing the same thing
and
