Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the coming week (12/09-12/15)

2016-12-11 Thread Brian Rosmaita 
On 12/10/16 12:56 PM, Andrey Pavlov wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Can you also review this - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/401277/
> for bug - https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance-store/+bug/1644177

Hi Andrey.  If you review some of the priority items below, I'm sure
someone will take a look at your patch.

cheers,
brian


> And please consider backport to Newton.
> 
> This bug is very annoying for deployments with several controllers and
> glance over cinder...
> 
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Brian Rosmaita 
> wrote:
> 
>> As discussed at the Glance weekly meeting yesterday, the priorities for
>> 12/1 through 12/8, unfortunately look very similar to last week's
>> priorities.  Some core reviewers need to step up.  The priorities are:
>>
>> Highest priority
>> 
>>
>> (1) database strategy for rolling upgrades:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/331740/
>> This one has a video to enhance your reviewing pleasure and demonstrate
>> that the approach described actually is workable:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4iwJRlPqOw
>>
>> (2) glance expand/contract migrations with alembic:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/374278/
>> We need another +2 on this one, preferably from a non-Rackspace person.
>>
>> (3) community images spec update:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396919/
>> New to the list.  The latest patch includes the migration strategy for
>> which Erno said indicated on the patch he'd change his -2 to a +2, so
>> don't let the -2 on the patch stop you from reviewing it.
>>
>> The above three specs need to be reviewed as soon as possible.  We are
>> blocking Alex and Hemanth, because the Ocata database migration will
>> handle the community images changes.
>>
>>
>> Really high priority
>> 
>> (would be highest if the specs were already approved)
>>
>> (4) Patch to fix a glance_store regression:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/387719/
>> and patch to prevent a related backend misconfiguration:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/388944/
>>
>> (5) Patch to enable better request-id tracking:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/352892/
>> This will be nice for operators, let's get it reviewed and merged!
>>
>> (6) Request for some insights and opinions for bug
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1585917
>>
>>
>> Please take a look
>> ==
>>
>> (7) glanceclient problem: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/319960/
>>
>> thanks,
>> brian
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the coming week (12/09-12/15)

2016-12-10 Thread Andrey Pavlov 
Hello,

Can you also review this - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/401277/
for bug - https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance-store/+bug/1644177

And please consider backport to Newton.

This bug is very annoying for deployments with several controllers and
glance over cinder...

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Brian Rosmaita 
wrote:

> As discussed at the Glance weekly meeting yesterday, the priorities for
> 12/1 through 12/8, unfortunately look very similar to last week's
> priorities.  Some core reviewers need to step up.  The priorities are:
>
> Highest priority
> 
>
> (1) database strategy for rolling upgrades:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/331740/
> This one has a video to enhance your reviewing pleasure and demonstrate
> that the approach described actually is workable:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4iwJRlPqOw
>
> (2) glance expand/contract migrations with alembic:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/374278/
> We need another +2 on this one, preferably from a non-Rackspace person.
>
> (3) community images spec update:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396919/
> New to the list.  The latest patch includes the migration strategy for
> which Erno said indicated on the patch he'd change his -2 to a +2, so
> don't let the -2 on the patch stop you from reviewing it.
>
> The above three specs need to be reviewed as soon as possible.  We are
> blocking Alex and Hemanth, because the Ocata database migration will
> handle the community images changes.
>
>
> Really high priority
> 
> (would be highest if the specs were already approved)
>
> (4) Patch to fix a glance_store regression:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/387719/
> and patch to prevent a related backend misconfiguration:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/388944/
>
> (5) Patch to enable better request-id tracking:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/352892/
> This will be nice for operators, let's get it reviewed and merged!
>
> (6) Request for some insights and opinions for bug
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1585917
>
>
> Please take a look
> ==
>
> (7) glanceclient problem: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/319960/
>
> thanks,
> brian
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Kind Regards,
Andrey Pavlov.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the coming week (12/09-12/15)

2016-12-09 Thread Brian Rosmaita 
As discussed at the Glance weekly meeting yesterday, the priorities for
12/1 through 12/8, unfortunately look very similar to last week's
priorities.  Some core reviewers need to step up.  The priorities are:

Highest priority


(1) database strategy for rolling upgrades:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/331740/
This one has a video to enhance your reviewing pleasure and demonstrate
that the approach described actually is workable:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4iwJRlPqOw

(2) glance expand/contract migrations with alembic:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/374278/
We need another +2 on this one, preferably from a non-Rackspace person.

(3) community images spec update:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396919/
New to the list.  The latest patch includes the migration strategy for
which Erno said indicated on the patch he'd change his -2 to a +2, so
don't let the -2 on the patch stop you from reviewing it.

The above three specs need to be reviewed as soon as possible.  We are
blocking Alex and Hemanth, because the Ocata database migration will
handle the community images changes.


Really high priority

(would be highest if the specs were already approved)

(4) Patch to fix a glance_store regression:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/387719/
and patch to prevent a related backend misconfiguration:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/388944/

(5) Patch to enable better request-id tracking:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/352892/
This will be nice for operators, let's get it reviewed and merged!

(6) Request for some insights and opinions for bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1585917


Please take a look
==

(7) glanceclient problem: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/319960/

thanks,
brian

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev