Thanks for the feedback everyone. Lucas has submitted a patch to ironic-lib¹s
README to clarify this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/319251/.
--ruby
On 2016-05-20, 8:46 AM, "Jim Rollenhagen" wrote:
>On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 01:21:35PM -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
>> On 05/16/2016 07:
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 01:21:35PM -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
> On 05/16/2016 07:14 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
> > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Loo, Ruby wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> A patch to ironic-lib made me wonder about what is our supported usage of
> >> ironic-lib. Or even t
On 05/16/2016 07:14 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Loo, Ruby wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A patch to ironic-lib made me wonder about what is our supported usage of
>> ironic-lib. Or even the intent/scope of it. This patch changes a method,
>> ‘bootable’ parameter is remov
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > So… how does any library get ready to be used by others? Clearly it is
> being
> > used now by the fuel-agent. Do we say ‘sorry fuel-agent, we don’t
> guarantee
> > yet that we won’t break you’? Or ‘fuel-agent, just so you kn
Hi,
> So… how does any library get ready to be used by others? Clearly it is being
> used now by the fuel-agent. Do we say ‘sorry fuel-agent, we don’t guarantee
> yet that we won’t break you’? Or ‘fuel-agent, just so you know. Ironic-lib
> isn’t quite ready to be used so we cannot guarantee that w
: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Date: Monday, May 16, 2016 at 11:25 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] usage of ironic-lib
Hi,
I'd like to point that ironic-lib is alrea
> -Original Message-
> From: Lucas Alvares Gomes [mailto:lucasago...@gmail.com]
> What I don't think we should do is say that the library's _right now_
> ready for it, the interfaces we have at the moment should not be
> considered stable, Ironic is very opinionated in many aspects
> (speci
Hi,
I'd like to point that ironic-lib is already used outside of Ironic tree -
for the third-party deployment drivers, e.g this fuel-agent based one [0].
[0]
https://github.com/openstack/fuel-agent/blob/master/contrib/ironic/ironic-fa-deploy/ironic_fa_deploy/modules/fuel_agent.py#L30
Best regard
Hi,
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Sam Betts (sambetts)
wrote:
> I personally disagree with saying that if we wanted it make it usable by
> projects other than ones in the Ironic umbrella it should go into oslo. I
> think that non-ironic projects directly related to Ironic such as out of
> tree
I tend to agree with Lucas. I think ironic-lib was designed to have common
code to be used primarily into ironic and IPA. It was not intended to be
used in other projects. We tend to add methods in the ironic-lib with
Ironic and IPA in mind and never thought of it could be used by out of tree
drive
I personally disagree with saying that if we wanted it make it usable by
projects other than ones in the Ironic umbrella it should go into oslo. I
think that non-ironic projects directly related to Ironic such as out of
tree drivers etc, should be able to utilise the code placed into
ironic-lib.
Hi,
Thanks for starting this discussion Ruby.
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Loo, Ruby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A patch to ironic-lib made me wonder about what is our supported usage of
> ironic-lib. Or even the intent/scope of it. This patch changes a method,
> ‘bootable’ parameter is removed and ‘bo
Hi,
A patch to ironic-lib made me wonder about what is our supported usage of
ironic-lib. Or even the intent/scope of it. This patch changes a method,
‘bootable’ parameter is removed and ‘boot_flag’ parameter is added [1].
If this library/method is used by some out-of-tree thing (or even some i
13 matches
Mail list logo
