Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-19 Thread Steve Gordon
] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a89f5ce5f4 > From: "Steven Dake (stdake)" <std...@cisco.com> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: 16/03/2016 03:

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-19 Thread Kai Qiang Wu
tack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 3:20:46 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro > > Hi Stdake, > > There is a patch about Atomic 23 support in Magnum. And atomic 23 uses > kubernetes 1.0.6, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-15 Thread Kai Qiang Wu
tack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Date: 16/03/2016 03:23 am Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro WFM as long as we stick to the spir

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-15 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
gt;> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro From: Adrian Otto [mailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com] Sent: March-14-16 4:49 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-14 Thread Hongbin Lu
From: Adrian Otto [mailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com] Sent: March-14-16 4:49 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro Steve, I think you may have misunderstood our intent here

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-14 Thread Adrian Otto
stions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro From: Corey O'Brien [mailto:coreypobr...@gmail.com] Sent: March-07-16 8:11 AM To: OpenStack Developme

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-14 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
ject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro From: Corey O'Brien [mailto:coreypobr...@gmail.com] Sent: March-07-16 8:11 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-07 Thread Hongbin Lu
From: Corey O'Brien [mailto:coreypobr...@gmail.com] Sent: March-07-16 8:11 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro Hongbin, I think the offer to support different OS options

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-07 Thread Corey O'Brien
ackspace.com] > *Sent:* March-04-16 6:31 PM > > > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting > single/multiple OS distro > > > > Steve, > > > > On Mar 4, 2016, at 2:4

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-04 Thread Hongbin Lu
From: Adrian Otto [mailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com] Sent: March-04-16 6:31 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro Steve, On Mar 4, 2016, at 2:41 PM, Steven Dake (stdake

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-04 Thread Adrian Otto
@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Monday, February 29, 2016 at 9:40 AM To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-04 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
4, 2016 at 12:48 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro Hongbin, To be clear, this

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-04 Thread Daneyon Hansen (danehans)
. Best regards, Hongbin From: Corey O'Brien [mailto:coreypobr...@gmail.com] Sent: March-04-16 11:37 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro I don't think anyone is saying that c

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-04 Thread Adrian Otto
ons) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro I don't think anyone is saying that code should somehow block support for multiple distros. The discussion at midcycle was about what the we should gate on and ensure feature parity for as a team. Ideall

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-04 Thread Hongbin Lu
[mailto:coreypobr...@gmail.com] Sent: March-04-16 11:37 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro I don't think anyone is saying that code should somehow block support for multiple

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-04 Thread Corey O'Brien
-steve > > From: Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com> > Reply-To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: Monday, February 29, 2016 at 9:40 AM > To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" <openstack-dev@lists.opensta

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-04 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
AM To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro Hi team, This is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-01 Thread Hongbin Lu
From: Adrian Otto [mailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com] Sent: March-01-16 9:54 AM To: Guz Egor Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro This issue involves what I refer to as &qu

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-01 Thread Adrian Otto
space.com<mailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:36 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of s

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-01 Thread Steve Gordon
<sgor...@redhat.com> > To: Guz Egor <guz_e...@yahoo.com>, "OpenStack Development Mailing > List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Cc: Josh Berkus <jber...@redhat.com> > Date: 01/03/2016 08:19 pm > Subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-01 Thread Kai Qiang Wu
e questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Cc: Martin Andre <maan...@redhat.com>, Josh Berkus <jber...@redhat.com> Date: 01/03/2016 08:25 pm Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum]Discussion of supporting single/multiple O

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-01 Thread Kai Qiang Wu
om> Date: 01/03/2016 08:19 pm Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro - Original Message - > From: "Guz Egor" <guz_e...@yahoo.com> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usa

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-01 Thread Steve Gordon
penStack deployments) and CoreOS (is > > highly adopted/tested in Kub community and Mesosphere DCOS uses it as > > well). > > We can implement CoreOS support as driver and users can use it as > > reference > > implementation. > > > > --- Egor >

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-01 Thread Steve Gordon
ts.openstack.org> > Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:36 AM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting > single/multiple OS distro > > Consider this: Which OS runs on the bay nodes is not important to end users. > What matters to users is the environmen

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-03-01 Thread Guz Egor
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro Consider this: Which OS runs on the bay nodes is not important to end users. What matters to users is the environments their containers execute in, which has only one thing in common with the bay node OS

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-02-29 Thread Ton Ngo
g List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Date: 02/29/2016 06:30 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro I think users need the support for multiple OS choices. Users may w

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-02-29 Thread 王华
I think users need the support for multiple OS choices. Users may want to modify the OS by themselves to meet the requirement of their business. If Magnum only supports a single OS distro, we should have a convenient way to change one OS distro to another. But the OSes are so different, the work

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-02-29 Thread Hongbin Lu
From: Adrian Otto [mailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com] Sent: February-29-16 1:36 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro Consider this: Which OS runs on the bay nodes

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-02-29 Thread Tim Bell
From: Adrian Otto Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Monday 29 February 2016 at 19:36 To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-02-29 Thread Adrian Otto
Consider this: Which OS runs on the bay nodes is not important to end users. What matters to users is the environments their containers execute in, which has only one thing in common with the bay node OS: the kernel. The linux syscall interface is stable enough that the various linux

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-02-29 Thread Cammann, Tom
dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro Hi team, This is a continued discussion from a revi

[openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

2016-02-29 Thread Hongbin Lu
Hi team, This is a continued discussion from a review [1]. Corey O'Brien suggested to have Magnum support a single OS distro (Atomic). I disagreed. I think we should bring the discussion to here to get broader set of inputs. Corey O'Brien >From the midcycle, we decided we weren't going to