Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Maintaining support for the Tail-f NCS mech driver in Icehouse

2014-02-10 Thread balaj...@freescale.com
rg > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Maintaining support for the > Tail-f NCS mech driver in Icehouse > > I think testing with sandbox repo is really useful during setting up > third party CI. Not so many people know sandbox repo. > When neutron folks were setting up t

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Maintaining support for the Tail-f NCS mech driver in Icehouse

2014-02-10 Thread Akihiro Motoki
I think testing with sandbox repo is really useful during setting up third party CI. Not so many people know sandbox repo. When neutron folks were setting up third party CI, we created test reviews in openstack/neutron, but if we knew it it would be great. It is worth documented in "Third Party Te

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Maintaining support for the Tail-f NCS mech driver in Icehouse

2014-02-09 Thread Anita Kuno
On 02/06/2014 09:52 AM, Luke Gorrie wrote: > Howdy! > > My name is Luke and I'm helping my friends at Tail-f Systems to > support Neutron with their NCS [1] product. This went really smoothly > for us on the Havana cycle, but lately we're having a harder time with > Icehouse. In particular, our at

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Maintaining support for the Tail-f NCS mech driver in Icehouse

2014-02-09 Thread Michael Still
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:10 AM, CARVER, PAUL wrote: > Kyle Mestery wrote: > >>So, in general I don't think this will fly because it's my understanding the >>OpenStack servers only test fully open source code. Allowing a third party >>vendor system to run on the OpenStack servers as part of any fu

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Maintaining support for the Tail-f NCS mech driver in Icehouse

2014-02-09 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Feb 9, 2014, at 4:10 PM, CARVER, PAUL wrote: > Kyle Mestery wrote: > >> So, in general I don't think this will fly because it's my understanding the >> OpenStack servers only test fully open source code. Allowing a third party >> vendor system to run on the OpenStack servers as part of any

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Maintaining support for the Tail-f NCS mech driver in Icehouse

2014-02-09 Thread CARVER, PAUL
Kyle Mestery wrote: >So, in general I don't think this will fly because it's my understanding the >OpenStack servers only test fully open source code. Allowing a third party >vendor system to run on the OpenStack servers as part of any functional >testing would open an entirely new can of worms h

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Maintaining support for the Tail-f NCS mech driver in Icehouse

2014-02-09 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Feb 6, 2014, at 8:52 AM, Luke Gorrie wrote: > Howdy! > > My name is Luke and I'm helping my friends at Tail-f Systems to > support Neutron with their NCS [1] product. This went really smoothly > for us on the Havana cycle, but lately we're having a harder time with > Icehouse. In particular,

[openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Maintaining support for the Tail-f NCS mech driver in Icehouse

2014-02-06 Thread Luke Gorrie
Howdy! My name is Luke and I'm helping my friends at Tail-f Systems to support Neutron with their NCS [1] product. This went really smoothly for us on the Havana cycle, but lately we're having a harder time with Icehouse. In particular, our attempt to fulfill the 3rd party testing requirements has