: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS
Agent extension for Newton cycle
Hi all,
sorry for digging up this thread. I took a liberty to submitt an RFE per Ihar's
suggestion for the first step (switching to l2 agent extensions):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netwo
Hi all,
sorry for digging up this thread. I took a liberty to submitt an RFE per
Ihar's suggestion for the first step (switching to l2 agent extensions):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-sfc/+bug/1586024
As a followup on that - hoping to send some wip patches in the near time.
Hope to hear
+1 for the bi-weekly proposal @17:00 UTC Tuesday.
IMO, let's start with this and then we can check on the feasibility of
having the meeting on a weekly basis.
On May 23, 2016 1:10 PM, "Takashi Yamamoto" wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
> wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> >
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
wrote:
> Hey,
>
>Finally we took over the channel for 1h. mostly because the time was
> already agreed between many people on opposed timezones and it was a bit
> late to cancel it.
>
>The first point was finding a suitable timeslot
No worries. If the slot isn't available maybe we can get infra to add
another channel.
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo <
majop...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hey,
>
>Finally we took over the channel for 1h. mostly because the time was
> already agreed between many people on
Hey,
Finally we took over the channel for 1h. mostly because the time was
already agreed between many people on opposed timezones and it was a bit
late to cancel it.
The first point was finding a suitable timeslot for a biweekly meeting
-for some time- and alternatively following up on emai
Yeah, no meetings in #openstack-neutron please. It leaves us nowhere to
discuss development stuff during that hour.
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo <
majop...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I agree, let's try to find a timeslot that works.
>
> using #openstack-neutron with the meet
I agree, let's try to find a timeslot that works.
using #openstack-neutron with the meetbot works, but it's going to generate
a lot of noise.
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
wrote:
>
> > On 16 May 2016, at 15:47, Takashi Yamamoto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:25
> On 16 May 2016, at 15:47, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Takashi Yamamoto
> wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>>> +1 for earlier time. But also, have we booked any channel for the meeting?
>>> Hijacking #openstack-neu
.
>>> In the meeting, we can see if we can reach consensus on a new meeting time.
>>>
>>> Cathy
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Takashi Yamamoto [mailto:yamam...@midokura.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 12:40 AM
>>
m]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 12:40 AM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and
>> OVS Agent extension for Newton cycle
>>
>> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:41
-Original Message-
> From: Takashi Yamamoto [mailto:yamam...@midokura.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 12:40 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS
> Agent exte
Yamamoto [mailto:yamam...@midokura.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 12:40 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS
Agent extension for Newton cycle
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:41 AM, wrote:
>
Mathieu Rohon; Shaughnessy, David; Eichberger, German; Henry Fourie;
>> arma...@gmail.com; Miguel Angel Ajo; Reedip; Thierry Carrez
>> Cc: Cathy Zhang
>> Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and
>> OVS Agent extension for Newton cycle
>>
&
ge questions); 'Ihar
Hrachyshka'; Vikram Choudhary; 'Sean M. Collins'; 'Haim Daniel'; 'Mathieu
Rohon'; 'Shaughnessy, David'; 'Eichberger, German'; Cathy Zhang; Henry Fourie;
'arma...@gmail.com'
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [neu
t; Here is the etherpad catching our previous requirement discussion on
> OVS agent (Thanks David for the link! I remember we had this
> discussion before)
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/l2-agent-extensions-api-expansion
>
>
> More inline.
>
> Thanks,
> Cathy
>
>
>
n on OVS agent (Thanks
> David for the link! I remember we had this discussion before)
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/l2-agent-extensions-api-expansion
>
>
> More inline.
>
> Thanks,
> Cathy
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ihar Hrachyshka [mailto:ihr
; Henry Fourie; arma...@gmail.com; Miguel
Angel Ajo; Reedip; Thierry Carrez
Cc: Cathy Zhang
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS
Agent extension for Newton cycle
Hi everyone,
We have room 400 at 3:10pm on Thursday available for discussion of the two
topics
, 2016 10:50 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS
Agent extension for Newton cycle
Trying to find you folks. I was late
El 27/4/2016 12:04, "Paul Carver"
mailto:pcar...@pau
Please add me to whatsapp or telegram if you use that : +34636522569
El 27/4/2016 12:50, majop...@redhat.com escribió:
> Trying to find you folks. I was late
> El 27/4/2016 12:04, "Paul Carver" escribió:
>
>> SFC team and anybody else dealing with flow selection/classification
>> (e.g. QoS),
>>
>
Trying to find you folks. I was late
El 27/4/2016 12:04, "Paul Carver" escribió:
> SFC team and anybody else dealing with flow selection/classification (e.g.
> QoS),
>
> I just wanted to confirm that we're planning to meet in salon C today
> (Wednesday) to get lunch but then possibly move to a qu
SFC team and anybody else dealing with flow selection/classification
(e.g. QoS),
I just wanted to confirm that we're planning to meet in salon C today
(Wednesday) to get lunch but then possibly move to a quieter location to
discuss the common flow classifier ideas.
On 4/21/2016 19:42, Cathy
On 04/22/2016 02:42 AM, Cathy Zhang wrote:
> So let’s meet at "Salon C" for lunch from 12:30pm~1:50pm on Wednesday
> and then continue the discussion at Room 400 at 3:10pm Thursday.
>
> Since Salon C is a big room, I will put a sign “Common Flow Classifier
> and OVS Agent Extension” on the table
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Cathy Zhang; Miguel Angel Ajo; Reedip
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS
Agent extension for Newton cycle
+1 on Wednesday lunch
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka
ma
+1 on Wednesday lunch
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka
wrote:
> Cathy Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>>
>> We have room 400 at 3:10pm on Thursday available for discussion of the
>> two topics.
>> Another option is to use the common room with roundtables in "Salon C"
>> during Mo
Cathy Zhang wrote:
Hi everyone,
We have room 400 at 3:10pm on Thursday available for discussion of the
two topics.
Another option is to use the common room with roundtables in "Salon C"
during Monday or Wednesday lunch time.
Room 400 at 3:10pm is a closed room while the Salon C is a big
Carrez
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS
Agent extension for Newton cycle
Hi everyone,
We have room 400 at 3:10pm on Thursday available for discussion of the two
topics.
Another option is to use the common room with roundtables in "Salon C" duri
7;; Vikram Choudhary; 'Sean M. Collins'; 'Haim Daniel'; 'Mathieu
Rohon'; 'Shaughnessy, David'; 'Eichberger, German'; Cathy Zhang; Henry Fourie;
'arma...@gmail.com'
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and O
ber", "local_zone",
>> > etc..) , and those standard registers should be filled in for all
>> > extensions at the input stage.
>> >
>> >and probably c,d,e,f,g,h what I didn't manage to think of.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016
; >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sure will include you in the discussion. Let me know if there are other
> > > Tap-as-a-Service members who would like to join this initiative.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cathy
> > >
> > >
&g
ho would like to join this initiative.
> >
> >
> >
> > Cathy
> >
> >
> >
> > From: reedip banerjee [mailto:reedi...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 7:03 PM
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
&
ther
> Tap-as-a-Service members who would like to join this initiative.
>
>
>
> Cathy
>
>
>
> From: reedip banerjee [mailto:reedi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 7:03 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subjec
;> Sure will include you in the discussion. Let me know if there are other
>> Tap-as-a-Service members who would like to join this initiative.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cathy
>>
>>
>>
>> From: reedip banerjee [mailto:reedi...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday,
usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS
Agent extension for Newton cycle
Speaking on behalf of Tap-as-a-Service members, we would also be very much
interested in the following initiative :)
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
; Mathieu Rohon; Shaughnessy, David;
Eichberger, German; Henry Fourie; Armando M.
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS
Agent extension for Newton cycle
Cathy Zhang wrote:
>
> I think there is no formal spec or anything, just some emails around
Speaking on behalf of Tap-as-a-Service members, we would also be very much
interested in the following initiative :)
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
wrote:
> Cathy Zhang wrote:
>
>
>> I think there is no formal spec or anything, just some emails around
>> there.
>>
>> That
Cathy Zhang wrote:
I think there is no formal spec or anything, just some emails around there.
That said, I don’t follow why it’s a requirement for SFC to switch to l2
agent extension mechanism. Even today, with SFC maintaining its own
agent, there are no clear guarantees for flow priorit
sage-
From: Ihar Hrachyshka [mailto:ihrac...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 3:34 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS
Agent extension for Newton cycle
Cathy Zhang wrote:
Just to echo others: FWaaS would be interested in this as well so please keep
us in the loop.
Thanks,
German
On 4/14/16, 7:12 AM, "Sean M. Collins" wrote:
>Vikram Choudhary wrote:
>> Hi Cathy,
>>
>> A project called "neutron-classifier [1]" is also there addressing the same
>> use case. Le
Vikram Choudhary wrote:
> Hi Cathy,
>
> A project called "neutron-classifier [1]" is also there addressing the same
> use case. Let's sync up and avoid work duplicity.
>
> [1] https://github.com/openstack/neutron-classifier
Agree with Vikram - we have a small git repo that we're using to futz
ar
questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS
Agent extension for Newton cycle
Hi cathy,
at net-bgpvpn, we're very interested in this effort. Please, keep us in the
loop.
Mathieu
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Haim Daniel
mailto:hdan...@redha
Cathy Zhang wrote:
Hi everyone,
Per Armando’s request, Louis and I are looking into the following
features for Newton cycle.
· Neutron Common FC used for SFC, QoS, Tap as a service etc.,
· OVS Agent extension
Some of you might know that we already developed a FC in networking
Hi cathy,
at net-bgpvpn, we're very interested in this effort. Please, keep us in the
loop.
Mathieu
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Haim Daniel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd +1 Vikram's comment on neutron-classifier , RFE [1] contains the
> original thread about that topic.
>
>
> [1] https://bugs.laun
Hi,
I'd +1 Vikram's comment on neutron-classifier , RFE [1] contains the
original thread about that topic.
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1527671
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Vikram Choudhary wrote:
> Hi Cathy,
>
> A project called "neutron-classifier [1]" is also there addre
Hi Cathy,
A project called "neutron-classifier [1]" is also there addressing the same
use case. Let's sync up and avoid work duplicity.
[1] https://github.com/openstack/neutron-classifier
Thanks
Vikram
On Apr 14, 2016 6:40 AM, "Cathy Zhang" wrote:
Hi everyone,
Per Armando’s request, Louis and
Hi everyone,
Per Armando's request, Louis and I are looking into the following features for
Newton cycle.
* Neutron Common FC used for SFC, QoS, Tap as a service etc.,
* OVS Agent extension
Some of you might know that we already developed a FC in networking-sfc project
and QoS al
46 matches
Mail list logo
