Kashyap Chamarthy writes:
> If it reduces nondeterministic spam for the CI Infra, and makes us
> achieve the task at hand, sure. [/me need to educate himself a
> bit more on the Zuul pipeline infrastructure.]
>
> Worth filing this (and your 'idle pipeline' thought below) in the Zuul
> tracker he
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 02:35:34PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2016-07-01 15:39:10 +0200 (+0200), Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> > [Snip description of some nice debugging.]
> >
> > > I'd really love it if there was
> > >
> > > 1. the ability to request checking of just specific jobs eg
> > >
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 02:13:46PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> Have you considered just writing a throwaway devstack-gate change
> which overrides the gate_hook to run that one suspect Tempest test,
> say, a thousand times in a loop? Would be far more efficient if you
> don't need to be concerne
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 02:35:34PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2016-07-01 15:39:10 +0200 (+0200), Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> > [Snip description of some nice debugging.]
> >
> > > I'd really love it if there was
> > >
> > > 1. the ability to request checking of just specific jobs eg
> > >
This option is already available for live-migration job, as it's hooks are
under nova project.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> Have you considered just writing a throwaway devstack-gate change
> which overrides the gate_hook to run that one suspect Tempest test,
> say, a
On 2016-07-01 15:39:10 +0200 (+0200), Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> [Snip description of some nice debugging.]
>
> > I'd really love it if there was
> >
> > 1. the ability to request checking of just specific jobs eg
> >
> > "recheck gate-tempest-dsvm-multinode-full"
>
> Yes, this would rea
Have you considered just writing a throwaway devstack-gate change
which overrides the gate_hook to run that one suspect Tempest test,
say, a thousand times in a loop? Would be far more efficient if you
don't need to be concerned with all the environment setup/teardown
overhead.
--
Jeremy Stanley
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 02:44:36PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
[Snip description of some nice debugging.]
> I'd really love it if there was
>
> 1. the ability to request checking of just specific jobs eg
>
> "recheck gate-tempest-dsvm-multinode-full"
Yes, this would really be desir
Hi,
talking about live-migration job. If you are OK to re-run tempest tests
multiple times on single environment you could wrap this line:
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/tests/live_migration/hooks/run_tests.sh#L30
in for-cycle.
Timofey.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Spence
This is some neat work. I like it.
We have a graph of nodepool nodes in use in grafana[1]. Looking at a 30
day window, its pretty easy to tell that the weekends are low activity.
Running big tests like this on a Saturday would be great. Of course,
there won't be much infra support on that day.
W
On 6/30/2016 8:44 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
A bunch of people in Nova and upstream QEMU teams are trying to investigate
a long standing bug in live migration[1]. Unfortuntely the bug is rather
non-deterministic - eg on the multinode-live-migration tempest job it has
hit 4 times in 7 days, whi
A bunch of people in Nova and upstream QEMU teams are trying to investigate
a long standing bug in live migration[1]. Unfortuntely the bug is rather
non-deterministic - eg on the multinode-live-migration tempest job it has
hit 4 times in 7 days, while on multinode-full tempest job it has hit
~70 ti
12 matches
Mail list logo
