ks!
2014-04-12 1:00 GMT+08:00 Tim Bell :
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andrew Laski [mailto:andrew.la...@rackspace.com]
> > Sent: 11 April 2014 16:38
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Laski [mailto:andrew.la...@rackspace.com]
> Sent: 11 April 2014 16:38
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling
>
> On 04/10/14 at 11:33pm, Oleg Gel
Is there anyone currently working on Neat/Gantt projects? I'd like to
contribute to them, as well.
2014-04-11 11:37 GMT-03:00 Andrew Laski :
> On 04/10/14 at 11:33pm, Oleg Gelbukh wrote:
>
>> Andrew,
>>
>> Thank you for clarification!
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Andrew Laski > >wro
On 04/10/14 at 11:33pm, Oleg Gelbukh wrote:
Andrew,
Thank you for clarification!
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
The scheduler as it currently exists is a placement engine. There is
sufficient complexity in the scheduler with just that responsibility so I
would prefer
2014-04-11 0:22 GMT+08:00 Sylvain Bauza :
>
>
>
> 2014-04-10 16:16 GMT+02:00 Jay Lau :
>
>
>>
>>
>> 2014-04-10 0:57 GMT+08:00 Susanne Balle :
>>
>> Ditto. I am interested in contributing as well.
>>>
>>> Does Gant work with Devstack? I am assuming the link will give me
>>> directions on how to tes
2014-04-11 3:54 GMT+08:00 Steve Gordon :
> - Original Message -
> > Is it a same thing like openstack-neat project?
> >
> > http://openstack-neat.org/
> >
> > I am curious about why Neat was not accepted previously.
> >
> > -Hao
>
> Did anyone ever try to submit it? Looks useful though.
>
- Original Message -
> - Original Message -
> > Is it a same thing like openstack-neat project?
> >
> > http://openstack-neat.org/
> >
> > I am curious about why Neat was not accepted previously.
> >
> > -Hao
>
> Did anyone ever try to submit it? Looks useful though.
>
> -Steve
- Original Message -
> Is it a same thing like openstack-neat project?
>
> http://openstack-neat.org/
>
> I am curious about why Neat was not accepted previously.
>
> -Hao
Did anyone ever try to submit it? Looks useful though.
-Steve
___
Ope
Andrew,
Thank you for clarification!
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
>
>
> The scheduler as it currently exists is a placement engine. There is
> sufficient complexity in the scheduler with just that responsibility so I
> would prefer to see anything that's making runtime d
2014-04-10 16:16 GMT+02:00 Jay Lau :
>
>
>
> 2014-04-10 0:57 GMT+08:00 Susanne Balle :
>
> Ditto. I am interested in contributing as well.
>>
>> Does Gant work with Devstack? I am assuming the link will give me
>> directions on how to test it and contribute to the project.
>>
> You can refer to
>
S open source?
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
>
> Shane
>
> *From:* Susanne Balle [mailto:sleipnir...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 10, 2014 12:57 AM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling
2014-04-10 0:57 GMT+08:00 Susanne Balle :
> Ditto. I am interested in contributing as well.
>
> Does Gant work with Devstack? I am assuming the link will give me
> directions on how to test it and contribute to the project.
>
You can refer to
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014
On 04/10/14 at 11:48am, Oleg Gelbukh wrote:
Hello, Jay,
As a fork of nova-scheduler, Gantt most likely will handle initial
placement. However, even nova-scheduler now supports some runtime
operations (for example, scheduling of evacuated/migrated instances).
Please note that the operations you
questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling
Is the [1] mentioned below open source? Interested in it :)
Also, my own opinion is nova is a cloud solution that aim to control virtual /
real machine lifecycle management the dynamic scheduling mechanism is
something like
Stack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
,
Date: 04/09/2014 11:45 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling
@Oleg, Till now, I'm not sure the target of Gantt, is it for initial
placement policy or run time policy or both, can y
)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling
Hello, Jay,
As a fork of nova-scheduler, Gantt most likely will handle initial placement.
However, even nova-scheduler now supports some runtime operations (for example,
scheduling of evacuated/migrated instances).
Given the runtime scheduling
Hello, Jay,
As a fork of nova-scheduler, Gantt most likely will handle initial
placement. However, even nova-scheduler now supports some runtime
operations (for example, scheduling of evacuated/migrated instances).
Given the runtime scheduling arises in this list regularly, I guess such
features
ource?
Thanks.
--
Shane
From: Susanne Balle [mailto:sleipnir...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 12:57 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling
Ditto. I am interested in contributing as well.
Does Gant work
2014-04-09 18:57 GMT+02:00 Susanne Balle :
>
> Does Gant work with Devstack? I am assuming the link will give me
> directions on how to test it and contribute to the project.
>
>
https://github.com/openstack/gantt/blob/master/README.rst#disclaimer
Please consider Gantt repository as a no-op repo,
Ditto. I am interested in contributing as well.
Does Gant work with Devstack? I am assuming the link will give me
directions on how to test it and contribute to the project.
Susanne
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Henrique Truta <
henriquecostatr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Oleg, @Sylvain, @Leand
@Oleg, @Sylvain, @Leandro, Thanls. I'll check the Gantt project and the
blueprint
2014-04-09 12:59 GMT-03:00 Sylvain Bauza :
>
>
>
> 2014-04-09 17:47 GMT+02:00 Jay Lau :
>
> @Oleg, Till now, I'm not sure the target of Gantt, is it for initial
>> placement policy or run time policy or both, can y
2014-04-09 17:47 GMT+02:00 Jay Lau :
> @Oleg, Till now, I'm not sure the target of Gantt, is it for initial
> placement policy or run time policy or both, can you help clarify?
>
>
I don't want to talk on behalf of Oleg, but Gantt is targeted to be the
forklift of the current Nova scheduler. So, a
@Oleg, Till now, I'm not sure the target of Gantt, is it for initial
placement policy or run time policy or both, can you help clarify?
@Henrique, not sure if you know IBM PRS (Platform Resource Scheduler) [1],
we have finished the "dynamic scheduler" in our Icehouse version (PRS 2.2),
it has exac
Hi Enrique,
This bp [1] may cover the uses cases you are proposing. ( maybe not
using ceilometer )
Also, you can take a look at openstack-neat [2] ( outside project ),
that try to achieve something similar, but seems to be outdated.
There's another initiate to have an external scheduler (GANTT
Henrique,
You should check out Gantt project [1], it could be exactly the place to
implement such features. It is a generic cross-project Scheduler as a
Service forked from Nova recently.
[1] https://github.com/openstack/gantt
--
Best regards,
Oleg Gelbukh
Mirantis Labs
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at
Hello, everyone!
I am currently a graduate student and member of a group of contributors to
OpenStack. We believe that a dynamic scheduler could improve the efficiency
of an OpenStack cloud, either by rebalancing nodes to maximize performance
or to minimize the number of active hosts, in order to
26 matches
Mail list logo
