Sounds good to me too.
On 09/02/2014 08:20 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Oslo team,
>
> We need to consider how we are going to handle the approaching feature freeze
> deadline (4 Sept). We should, at this point, be focusing reviews on changes
> associated with blueprints. We will have time to fin
Yes, you’re right, I missed oslo.log.
Doug
On Sep 2, 2014, at 9:28 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Doug,
>
> plan is good. Same criteria will mean exception for oslo.log as well
>
> -- dims
>
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> Oslo team,
>>
>> We need to consider how w
Doug,
plan is good. Same criteria will mean exception for oslo.log as well
-- dims
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Oslo team,
>
> We need to consider how we are going to handle the approaching feature freeze
> deadline (4 Sept). We should, at this point, be focusing revi
Oslo team,
We need to consider how we are going to handle the approaching feature freeze
deadline (4 Sept). We should, at this point, be focusing reviews on changes
associated with blueprints. We will have time to finish graduation work and
handle bugs between the freeze and the release candida
