On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:50:03AM -0400, David Kranz wrote:
On 05/07/2014 10:48 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
Hi Sean,
2014-05-07 23:28 GMT+09:00 Sean Dague s...@dague.net:
On 05/07/2014 10:23 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
Hi David,
2014-05-07 22:53 GMT+09:00 David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com:
2014-05-10 0:29 GMT+09:00 Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:50:03AM -0400, David Kranz wrote:
On 05/07/2014 10:48 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
Hi Sean,
2014-05-07 23:28 GMT+09:00 Sean Dague s...@dague.net:
On 05/07/2014 10:23 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
Hi
On 05/09/2014 11:29 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:50:03AM -0400, David Kranz wrote:
On 05/07/2014 10:48 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
Hi Sean,
2014-05-07 23:28 GMT+09:00 Sean Dague s...@dague.net:
On 05/07/2014 10:23 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
Hi David,
2014-05-07
Hi Matthew,
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Treinish [mailto:mtrein...@kortar.org]
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2014 12:29 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Checking for return codes in tempest
client
calls
On 05/07/2014 10:48 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
Hi Sean,
2014-05-07 23:28 GMT+09:00 Sean Dague s...@dague.net:
On 05/07/2014 10:23 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
Hi David,
2014-05-07 22:53 GMT+09:00 David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com:
I just looked at a patch
I just looked at a patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90310/3 which
was given a -1 due to not checking that every call to list_hosts returns
200. I realized that we don't have a shared understanding or policy
about this. We need to make sure that each api is tested to return the
right
On 7 May 2014 14:53, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote:
I just looked at a patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90310/3 which was
given a -1 due to not checking that every call to list_hosts returns 200. I
realized that we don't have a shared understanding or policy about this.
snip
Hi David,
2014-05-07 22:53 GMT+09:00 David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com:
I just looked at a patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90310/3 which was
given a -1 due to not checking that every call to list_hosts returns 200. I
realized that we don't have a shared understanding or policy about this.
On 05/07/2014 10:23 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
Hi David,
2014-05-07 22:53 GMT+09:00 David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com:
I just looked at a patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90310/3 which was
given a -1 due to not checking that every call to list_hosts returns 200. I
realized that we don't
On 05/07/2014 10:07 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote:
On 7 May 2014 14:53, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote:
I just looked at a patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90310/3 which was
given a -1 due to not checking that every call to list_hosts returns 200. I
realized that we don't have a shared
Hi Sean,
2014-05-07 23:28 GMT+09:00 Sean Dague s...@dague.net:
On 05/07/2014 10:23 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
Hi David,
2014-05-07 22:53 GMT+09:00 David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com:
I just looked at a patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90310/3 which was
given a -1 due to not checking that
Hi All,
2014-05-07 22:53 GMT+09:00 David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com:
I just looked at a patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90310/3
which was given a -1 due to not checking that every call to list_hosts
returns 200. I realized that we don't have a shared understanding or
policy about this.
12 matches
Mail list logo
