On 2015-09-22 12:19:47 + (+), Neil Jerram wrote:
> FWIW - this email is tagged [all], and asks for help, but I don't
> understand it. Even though I've been fairly heavily engaged with
> OpenStack for more than a cycle now.
[...]
> So, please, if you really mean [all], say what you're sayin
Neil,
The effort is to spread the knowledge and skills beyond the "small group of
people who already understand all this" :)
Let me explain a bit. working backwards from what we see.
Most of us have seen the Proposal bot update reviews that get logged
periodically that updates the requirements.t
To most people who write on this list about requirements, constraints
and gate deadlocks, not just Robert...
FWIW - this email is tagged [all], and asks for help, but I don't
understand it. Even though I've been fairly heavily engaged with
OpenStack for more than a cycle now.
Obviously we can't
+1 Doug. Done. separated the os-client-config from that review.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
> [resending, the first copy was lost in transmission]
>
> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-09-21 16:08:51 -0400:
> > Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-
[resending, the first copy was lost in transmission]
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-09-21 16:08:51 -0400:
> Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-09-22 07:51:02 +1200:
> > Constraint updates are still failing: you can see this on
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/221157/
(fyi) That seems to have been fixed by
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225443/ .
On 9/21/15 3:51 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> Constraint updates are still failing: you can see this on
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/221157/ or more generally
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+projec
Constraint updates are still failing: you can see this on
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/221157/ or more generally
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/requirements+branch:master+topic:openstack/requirements/constraints,n,z
Now, the constraints system is *doing its job*
