Re: [openstack-dev] [stable-maint] acceptable changes for stable/icehouse
John Griffith wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Jay S. Bryant
> wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> We have been getting a number of non-security patches proposed to
>> stable/icehouse for Cinder. The cores were discussing what was ok to put
>> into icehouse at this point in time and couldn't agree as to whether we were
>> at the point of only accepting security changes.
>>
>> Appreciate advice on this topic.
>>
>
> Hey Jay,
>
> Thanks for raising this, my understanding was that we were in fact
> security only mode now for Icehouse. That being said I completely
> forgot that it's been that long already and I let some reviews slip
> myself just today in fact. Thanks for pointing it out.
Icehouse is now 9-month old, so it is in phase II support ("only
critical bugfixes and security patches are acceptable").
Reference: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch#Support_phases
In case of doubt, you can ask stable-maint-core people for advice:
https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/530,members
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [stable-maint] acceptable changes for stable/icehouse
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Jay S. Bryant wrote: > All, > > We have been getting a number of non-security patches proposed to > stable/icehouse for Cinder. The cores were discussing what was ok to put > into icehouse at this point in time and couldn't agree as to whether we were > at the point of only accepting security changes. > > Appreciate advice on this topic. > > Jay > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev Hey Jay, Thanks for raising this, my understanding was that we were in fact security only mode now for Icehouse. That being said I completely forgot that it's been that long already and I let some reviews slip myself just today in fact. Thanks for pointing it out. John ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [stable-maint] acceptable changes for stable/icehouse
All, We have been getting a number of non-security patches proposed to stable/icehouse for Cinder. The cores were discussing what was ok to put into icehouse at this point in time and couldn't agree as to whether we were at the point of only accepting security changes. Appreciate advice on this topic. Jay ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
