Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
[...]
Brain still booting this morning - 8am ftl. Thinking more clearly on this
point, we could add a requirement that the software produce a functional
out of the box working environment. This would easily apply to OSA and
possibly even Puppet/Chef efforts.
A stab
On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 15:37 +, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
>
> On 3/22/16, 2:15 AM, "Thierry Carrez" wrote:
>
> >
> > Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> > >
> > > Technical Committee,
> > >
> > > Please accept my proposal of a new type of project called a
> > > deployment
> > > [1]. If people
On 3/22/16, 2:15 AM, "Thierry Carrez" wrote:
>Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
>> Technical Committee,
>>
>> Please accept my proposal of a new type of project called a deployment
>> [1]. If people don¹t like the type name, we can change it. The basic
>> idea is there are a class of projects unrep
st (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][fuel][kolla][osa][tripleo] proposing
type:deployment
On 22 March 2016 at 09:15, Thierry Carrez
mailto:thie...@openstack.org>> wrote:
For OSA, we don't produce the deployment tool,
On 3/22/16, 2:15 AM, "Thierry Carrez" wrote:
>Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
>> Technical Committee,
>>
>> Please accept my proposal of a new type of project called a deployment
>> [1]. If people don¹t like the type name, we can change it. The basic
>> idea is there are a class of projects unrep
On 22 March 2016 at 09:15, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
> For OSA, we don't produce the deployment tool, only a set of playbooks. I
> was thinking we might need a type:packaging tag to describe which things we
> produce are just about packaging OpenStack things for usage by outside
> deployment system
Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Technical Committee,
Please accept my proposal of a new type of project called a deployment
[1]. If people don’t like the type name, we can change it. The basic
idea is there are a class of projects unrepresented by type:service and
type:library which are deployment
Technical Committee,
Please accept my proposal of a new type of project called a deployment [1]. If
people don't like the type name, we can change it. The basic idea is there are
a class of projects unrepresented by type:service and type:library which are
deployment projects including but not