Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] StarlingX project status update

2018-06-12 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:46 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Dean Troyer's message of 2018-06-12 09:28:48 -0500: > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Emilien Macchi > wrote: > > > While I agree with Doug that we assume good faith and hope for the > best, I > > > personally think we shou

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] StarlingX project status update

2018-06-12 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Dean Troyer's message of 2018-06-12 09:28:48 -0500: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > While I agree with Doug that we assume good faith and hope for the best, I > > personally think we should help them (what we're doing now) but also make > > sure we DO NOT

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] StarlingX project status update

2018-06-12 Thread Dean Troyer
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > While I agree with Doug that we assume good faith and hope for the best, I > personally think we should help them (what we're doing now) but also make > sure we DO NOT set a precedent. We could probably learn from this situation > and docume

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] StarlingX project status update

2018-06-11 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: [snip] > When all of this is done, a viable project with real users will be > open source instead of closed source. Those contributors, and users, > will be a part of our community instead of looking in from the > outside. The path is ugly, lon

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] StarlingX project status update

2018-06-05 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Graham Hayes's message of 2018-06-05 16:42:45 +0100: > > On 30/05/18 21:23, Mohammed Naser wrote: > > Hi everyone: > > > > Over the past week in the summit, there was a lot of discussion > > regarding StarlingX > > and members of the technical commitee had a few productive discussio

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] StarlingX project status update

2018-06-05 Thread Remo Mattei
I agree with Graham +1 Remo > On Jun 5, 2018, at 8:42 AM, Graham Hayes wrote: > > > > On 30/05/18 21:23, Mohammed Naser wrote: >> Hi everyone: >> >> Over the past week in the summit, there was a lot of discussion >> regarding StarlingX >> and members of the technical commitee had a few prod

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] StarlingX project status update

2018-06-05 Thread Graham Hayes
On 30/05/18 21:23, Mohammed Naser wrote: > Hi everyone: > > Over the past week in the summit, there was a lot of discussion > regarding StarlingX > and members of the technical commitee had a few productive discussions > regarding > the best approach to deal with a proposed new pilot project fo

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] StarlingX project status update

2018-06-05 Thread Mohammed Naser
Hi everyone: This email is just to provide an update to the initial email regarding the state of StarlingX. The team has proposed a set of repositories to be imported[1] which are completely new projects (not forks of OpenStack or any other open source software). Importing those projects will he

[openstack-dev] [tc] StarlingX project status update

2018-05-30 Thread Mohammed Naser
Hi everyone: Over the past week in the summit, there was a lot of discussion regarding StarlingX and members of the technical commitee had a few productive discussions regarding the best approach to deal with a proposed new pilot project for incubation in the OSF's Edge Computing strategic focus a