On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
>>
>> == Need for a TC meeting next Tuesday ==
>>
>> In order to make progress on the Pike goal selection, I think a
>> dedicated IRC meeting will be necessary. We have a set of valid goals
>> proposed already: we need to decide how many we sho
>
> == Need for a TC meeting next Tuesday ==
>
> In order to make progress on the Pike goal selection, I think a
> dedicated IRC meeting will be necessary. We have a set of valid goals
> proposed already: we need to decide how many we should have, and which
> ones. Gerrit is not great to have tha
On 11:17 Jun 16, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> == Need for a TC meeting next Tuesday ==
>
> In order to make progress on the Pike goal selection, I think a
> dedicated IRC meeting will be necessary. We have a set of valid goals
> proposed already: we need to decide how many we should have, and which
Since there are 2 topics that are very very important to me:
1. binary resolution waiting for votes
2. kolla stable:follows-policy tag
Is there anything I can to do help with either?
On 16 June 2017 at 09:23, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Clay Gerrard wrote:
>> I'm loving this new ML thing the TC is d
Clay Gerrard wrote:
> I'm loving this new ML thing the TC is doing! Like... I'm not going to
> come to the meeting. I'm not a helpful person in general and probably
> wouldn't have anything productive to say.
>
> But I love the *idea* that I know *when and where* this is being decided
> so that
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
> Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-06-16 11:17:30 +0200:
>
> > == Need for a TC meeting next Tuesday ==
> >
> > In order to make progress on the Pike goal selection, I think a
> > dedicated IRC meeting will be necessary. We have
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-06-16 11:17:30 +0200:
> == Need for a TC meeting next Tuesday ==
>
> In order to make progress on the Pike goal selection, I think a
> dedicated IRC meeting will be necessary. We have a set of valid goals
> proposed already: we need to decide how man
On 2017-06-16 11:17:30 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
> In order to make progress on the Pike goal selection, I think a
> dedicated IRC meeting will be necessary. We have a set of valid goals
> proposed already: we need to decide how many we should have, and which
> ones. Gerrit is not
Hi!
Back on regular schedule, here is an update on the status of a number
of TC-proposed governance changes, in an attempt to rely less on a
weekly meeting to convey that information.
You can find the full status list of open topics at:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee
