On 11/15/2016 10:41 AM, Gabriele Cerami wrote:
On 18 Oct, Gabriele Cerami wrote:
Hello,
after adding coverage in CI for HA IPv6 scenario here
https://review.openstack.org/363674 we wanted to add IPv6 testing on the
gates.
To not use any more resources the first suggestion to add IPv6 to the
g
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Gabriele Cerami wrote:
> On 18 Oct, Gabriele Cerami wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> after adding coverage in CI for HA IPv6 scenario here
>> https://review.openstack.org/363674 we wanted to add IPv6 testing on the
>> gates.
>> To not use any more resources the first sugges
On 18 Oct, Gabriele Cerami wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after adding coverage in CI for HA IPv6 scenario here
> https://review.openstack.org/363674 we wanted to add IPv6 testing on the
> gates.
> To not use any more resources the first suggestion to add IPv6 to the
> gates was to make all HA jobs IPv6, mov
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Gabriele Cerami wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after adding coverage in CI for HA IPv6 scenario here
> https://review.openstack.org/363674 we wanted to add IPv6 testing on the
> gates.
> To not use any more resources the first suggestion to add IPv6 to the
> gates was to make
Hello,
after adding coverage in CI for HA IPv6 scenario here
https://review.openstack.org/363674 we wanted to add IPv6 testing on the
gates.
To not use any more resources the first suggestion to add IPv6 to the
gates was to make all HA jobs IPv6, move network isolation testing for
IPv4 on non-ha j
