Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-12-02 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 03:58:01PM +, Derek Higgins wrote: > > > >Ah, I think all we have here is a terminology mismatch around "non voting" > >vs "non gating". > > > >AFAIK what is being proposed is to reinstate the TripleO jobs so they *do* > >vote on any change (+1/-1), but they do not blo

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-12-02 Thread Derek Higgins
On 02/12/15 12:53, Steven Hardy wrote: On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 05:10:57PM -0800, Devananda van der Veen wrote: On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 03:35:13PM -0800, Devananda van der Veen wrote: >Â Â On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Z

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-12-02 Thread Steven Hardy
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 06:00:26PM -0500, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 01/12/15 06:22, Steven Hardy wrote: > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> I don't think it hurts to turn it on, but tbh I'm uncomfortable with > >>> the > >>> mental overhead of a non-voting job that I have to manually treat as > >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-12-02 Thread Steven Hardy
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 05:10:57PM -0800, Devananda van der Veen wrote: >On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 03:35:13PM -0800, Devananda van der Veen wrote: > >    On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Zane Bitter > wrote: > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-12-01 Thread Devananda van der Veen
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 03:35:13PM -0800, Devananda van der Veen wrote: > >On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Zane Bitter > wrote: > > > > On 30/11/15 12:51, Ruby Loo wrote: > > > >On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-12-01 Thread Zane Bitter
On 01/12/15 06:22, Steven Hardy wrote: > +1 > > I don't think it hurts to turn it on, but tbh I'm uncomfortable with the > mental overhead of a non-voting job that I have to manually treat as a > voting job. If it's stable enough to make it a voting job, I'd prefer we > j

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-12-01 Thread Derek Higgins
On 30/11/15 22:18, Steven Hardy wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:51:53PM -0500, Ruby Loo wrote: On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, Â Â A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was based on instack. Before doing this w

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-12-01 Thread Steven Hardy
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 03:35:13PM -0800, Devananda van der Veen wrote: >On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > > On 30/11/15 12:51, Ruby Loo wrote: > >On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins > wrote: > >    Hi All,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-12-01 Thread Steven Hardy
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 06:07:44PM -0500, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 30/11/15 12:51, Ruby Loo wrote: > > > > > >On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins >> wrote: > > > >Hi All, > > > > A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one > >that w

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-12-01 Thread Sergey Kraynev
On 30 November 2015 at 18:19, Derek Higgins wrote: > Hi All, > > A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was > based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci > jobs and removed them from non tripleo projects. > > We'd like to investigate

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Devananda van der Veen
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 30/11/15 12:51, Ruby Loo wrote: > >> >> >> On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins > > wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one >> that was based

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Zane Bitter
On 30/11/15 12:51, Ruby Loo wrote: On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins mailto:der...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hi All, A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci jobs and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Steven Hardy
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:51:53PM -0500, Ruby Loo wrote: >On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins wrote: > > Hi All, > >     A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that > was based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Steven Hardy
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 03:19:18PM +, Derek Higgins wrote: > Hi All, > > A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was > based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci jobs > and removed them from non tripleo projects. > > We'd like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Steve Baker
On 01/12/15 04:19, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci jobs and removed them from non tripleo projects. We'd like to investigate adding it back to he

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Ruby Loo
On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins wrote: > Hi All, > > A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was > based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci > jobs and removed them from non tripleo projects. > > We'd like to investigate

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Lucas Alvares Gomes
I'm +1 for re-enabling it in Ironic. I think ironic plays a big role in the tripleo puzzle so we should be aware of breakages in the tripleo project. On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: > Hi All, > > A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was > bas

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Derek Higgins
On 30/11/15 17:03, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 11/30/2015 04:19 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci jobs and removed them from non tripleo projects.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 11/30/2015 04:19 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci jobs and removed them from non tripleo projects. We'd like to investigate adding it back t

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi All, A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci jobs and removed them from non tripleo projects. We'd like to investigate adding it back to heat and ironic as these are the two proje