On 11/25/2013 09:14 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
> Joe Gordon writes:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Robert Collins
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 25 November 2013 19:25, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Robert Collins <
>>> robe...@robertcollins.net>
wrote:
Joe Gordon writes:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Robert Collins
> wrote:
>
>> On 25 November 2013 19:25, Joe Gordon wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Robert Collins <
>> robe...@robertcollins.net>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I have a proposal - I think we should mark
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> On 25 November 2013 19:25, Joe Gordon wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Robert Collins <
> robe...@robertcollins.net>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I have a proposal - I think we should mark all recheck bugs critical,
> >> and
On 11/25/2013 11:54 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2013-11-25 01:30:11 -0800:
>> On 25 November 2013 22:23, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>
>>> I do wonder if we would be able to commit enough resources to just run
>>> two copies of the gate in parallel each time and requ
On 2013-11-25 09:55:03 -0800 (-0800), Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2013-11-25 06:52:02 -0800:
[...]
> > recheck no bug still has a host of valid use cases. Often times
> > I use it when I upload a patch, it fails because of a thing
> > somewhere else, we fix that, an
Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2013-11-25 06:52:02 -0800:
>
> On 11/25/2013 04:23 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Joe Gordon's message of 2013-11-24 21:00:58 -0800:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> TL;DR Last week the gate got wedged on nondeterministic failures. Unwedging
> >> the gate re
+2
Sent from my really tiny device...
> On Nov 25, 2013, at 5:02 AM, "Davanum Srinivas" wrote:
>
> Many thanks to everyone who helped with the many fixes. Kudos to
> Joe/Clark for spear heading the effort!
>
> -- dims
>
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2013-11-25 01:30:11 -0800:
> On 25 November 2013 22:23, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> > I do wonder if we would be able to commit enough resources to just run
> > two copies of the gate in parallel each time and require both to pass.
> > Doubling the odds* that
On 11/25/2013 04:23 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Joe Gordon's message of 2013-11-24 21:00:58 -0800:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> TL;DR Last week the gate got wedged on nondeterministic failures. Unwedging
>> the gate required drastic actions to fix bugs.
>>
>>
>
>
> (great write-up, thank you for
Many thanks to everyone who helped with the many fixes. Kudos to
Joe/Clark for spear heading the effort!
-- dims
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> TL;DR Last week the gate got wedged on nondeterministic failures. Unwedging
> the gate required drastic actions to fi
On 25 November 2013 22:23, Clint Byrum wrote:
> I do wonder if we would be able to commit enough resources to just run
> two copies of the gate in parallel each time and require both to pass.
> Doubling the odds* that we will catch an intermittent failure seems like
> something that might be wort
Excerpts from Joe Gordon's message of 2013-11-24 21:00:58 -0800:
> Hi All,
>
> TL;DR Last week the gate got wedged on nondeterministic failures. Unwedging
> the gate required drastic actions to fix bugs.
>
>
(great write-up, thank you for the details, and thank you for fixing
it!)
>
> Now th
On 25 November 2013 19:25, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Robert Collins
> wrote:
>>
>> I have a proposal - I think we should mark all recheck bugs critical,
>> and the respective project PTLs should actively shop around amongst
>> their contributors to get them fixed
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> I have a proposal - I think we should mark all recheck bugs critical,
> and the respective project PTLs should actively shop around amongst
> their contributors to get them fixed before other work: we should
> drive the known set of nondeter
I have a proposal - I think we should mark all recheck bugs critical,
and the respective project PTLs should actively shop around amongst
their contributors to get them fixed before other work: we should
drive the known set of nondeterministic issues down to 0 and keep it
there.
-Rob
On 25 Novemb
Hi All,
TL;DR Last week the gate got wedged on nondeterministic failures. Unwedging
the gate required drastic actions to fix bugs.
Starting on November 15th, gate jobs have been getting progressively less
stable with not enough attention given to fixing the issues, until we got
to the point where
16 matches
Mail list logo