Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?
On 05/04/2016 08:07 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 05/04/2016 02:44 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 05/02/2016 08:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote: When will we name the P release of OpenStack? We named two releases simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle. This gave us the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata) releases. If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the location is now known) we would be able to have names associated with the current release cycle (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P). This would also allow us to get back to only voting for one name per release cycle but consistently have names for N, N+1, and N+2. Do we have locations for the summit announced? It's hard to name anything without these.. Yes, was announced at the keynotes in Austin. May 2017 OpenStack Summit will be held in Boston and the November 2017 OpenStack Summit will be held in Sydney. Source: https://twitter.com/OpenStack/status/724628774961074176 Thanks! Would be good to duplicate it to openstack-announce (or was it done already?) for folks who were not on keynotes and don't follow twitter. ++ It should be continually noted that a non-zero number of our contributors do not use Twitter and are unlikely to start. So while tweets are great for the people who do use it, it should never be considered to have been communicated to our community if it was only tweeted. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?
On 05/04/2016 02:44 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 05/02/2016 08:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote: When will we name the P release of OpenStack? We named two releases simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle. This gave us the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata) releases. If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the location is now known) we would be able to have names associated with the current release cycle (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P). This would also allow us to get back to only voting for one name per release cycle but consistently have names for N, N+1, and N+2. Do we have locations for the summit announced? It's hard to name anything without these.. Yes, was announced at the keynotes in Austin. May 2017 OpenStack Summit will be held in Boston and the November 2017 OpenStack Summit will be held in Sydney. Source: https://twitter.com/OpenStack/status/724628774961074176 Thanks! Would be good to duplicate it to openstack-announce (or was it done already?) for folks who were not on keynotes and don't follow twitter. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?
Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 05/02/2016 08:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote: When will we name the P release of OpenStack? We named two releases simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle. This gave us the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata) releases. If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the location is now known) we would be able to have names associated with the current release cycle (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P). This would also allow us to get back to only voting for one name per release cycle but consistently have names for N, N+1, and N+2. Do we have locations for the summit announced? It's hard to name anything without these.. Yes, was announced at the keynotes in Austin. May 2017 OpenStack Summit will be held in Boston and the November 2017 OpenStack Summit will be held in Sydney. Source: https://twitter.com/OpenStack/status/724628774961074176 -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?
On 05/02/2016 08:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote: Hi everyone, When will we name the P release of OpenStack? We named two releases simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle. This gave us the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata) releases. If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the location is now known) we would be able to have names associated with the current release cycle (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P). This would also allow us to get back to only voting for one name per release cycle but consistently have names for N, N+1, and N+2. Do we have locations for the summit announced? It's hard to name anything without these.. Also do we base names on the main summit or the design summit locations? -- Thanks, Shamail Tahir t: @ShamailXD tz: Eastern Time __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?
Here are other ideas? Paul-Revere https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Revere Peabody A town north east of Boston. No special reason except saying the name personally makes me chuckle Patriots https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_England_Patriots -Original Message- From: Jonathan D. Proulx [mailto:j...@csail.mit.edu] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 10:29 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release? On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:09:40AM -0400, Adam Young wrote: :On 05/02/2016 08:07 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote: :>But, the original spelling of the landing site is Plimoth Rock. There were still highway signs up in the 70's directing folks to "Plimoth Rock" There are trill signs with both spellings. Presumably for sligtly different contexts. Even having lived here basically my whole life I'm not sure if there's a consistent distinction except the legal entity that is the town is always with a y :> :>--Rocky :>Who should know about rocks ;-) :And Providnece is, I think close enough for inclusion as well. And :that is just the towns. : : :Plymouth is the only County in Mass with a P name, but Penobscott ME :used to be part of MA, and should probably be in the running as well. I'd second Providnece and Penobscott as 'close enough'. I'm actually partial to Providence... -Jon __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential Providence -Original Message- From: Monty Taylor [mailto:mord...@inaugust.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 9:38 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release? On 05/03/2016 09:29 AM, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:09:40AM -0400, Adam Young wrote: > :On 05/02/2016 08:07 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote: > :>But, the original spelling of the landing site is Plimoth Rock. There were > still highway signs up in the 70's directing folks to "Plimoth Rock" > > There are trill signs with both spellings. Presumably for sligtly > different contexts. Even having lived here basically my whole life I'm > not sure if there's a consistent distinction except the legal entity > that is the town is always with a y > > :> > :>--Rocky > :>Who should know about rocks ;-) > > > > :And Providnece is, I think close enough for inclusion as well. And > :that is just the towns. If you think the geographic region should be "New England" instead of "Massachusetts", please leave a review comment on the review. I thought about suggesting New England since we already had one summit in Boston anyway. Input highly welcome. > : > : > :Plymouth is the only County in Mass with a P name, but Penobscott ME > :used to be part of MA, and should probably be in the running as well. > > > I'd second Providnece and Penobscott as 'close enough'. I'm actually > partial to Providence... __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?
On 05/03/2016 09:29 AM, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote: On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:09:40AM -0400, Adam Young wrote: :On 05/02/2016 08:07 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote: :>But, the original spelling of the landing site is Plimoth Rock. There were still highway signs up in the 70's directing folks to "Plimoth Rock" There are trill signs with both spellings. Presumably for sligtly different contexts. Even having lived here basically my whole life I'm not sure if there's a consistent distinction except the legal entity that is the town is always with a y :> :>--Rocky :>Who should know about rocks ;-) :And Providnece is, I think close enough for inclusion as well. And :that is just the towns. If you think the geographic region should be "New England" instead of "Massachusetts", please leave a review comment on the review. I thought about suggesting New England since we already had one summit in Boston anyway. Input highly welcome. : : :Plymouth is the only County in Mass with a P name, but Penobscott ME :used to be part of MA, and should probably be in the running as well. I'd second Providnece and Penobscott as 'close enough'. I'm actually partial to Providence... __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:09:40AM -0400, Adam Young wrote: :On 05/02/2016 08:07 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote: :>But, the original spelling of the landing site is Plimoth Rock. There were still highway signs up in the 70's directing folks to "Plimoth Rock" There are trill signs with both spellings. Presumably for sligtly different contexts. Even having lived here basically my whole life I'm not sure if there's a consistent distinction except the legal entity that is the town is always with a y :> :>--Rocky :>Who should know about rocks ;-) :And Providnece is, I think close enough for inclusion as well. And :that is just the towns. : : :Plymouth is the only County in Mass with a P name, but Penobscott ME :used to be part of MA, and should probably be in the running as well. I'd second Providnece and Penobscott as 'close enough'. I'm actually partial to Providence... -Jon __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?
On 05/02/2016 08:07 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote: But, the original spelling of the landing site is Plimoth Rock. There were still highway signs up in the 70's directing folks to "Plimoth Rock" --Rocky Who should know about rocks ;-) -Original Message- From: Brian Haley [mailto:brian.ha...@hpe.com] Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 3:12 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release? There seems to be some vaugaries about which aligns with which. If the Q naming alignes with Boston, I think it could be fun. The obvious one is Quincy, but Quabbin (Reservoir) and lots of other Algonquin names are in the running, too. If it is P, there are many other options: * Palmer <http://www.townofpalmer.com/> <http://www.palmerschools.org/> * Paxton <http://townofpaxton.net/> <http://www.rmlpaxton.org/> * Peabody <http://www.peabody-ma.gov/> <http://www.peabody.k12.ma.us/> * Pembroke <http://www.townofpembrokemass.org> <http://www.pembrokepolice.org/> * Pepperell <http://www.town.pepperell.ma.us/> <http://www.lawrencelibrary.org/> * Peru <http://www.mass.gov/cc/peru.html> <http://perulibrary.selfip.com/> * Phillipston <http://www.northquabbinchamber.com/> * Pittsfield <http://www.pittsfield-ma.org/> <http://www.berkshire.net/PittsfieldLibrary/> * Plainville <http://www.plainville.ma.us> Schools <http://www.plainville.mec.edu/> * Plymouth <http://www.townofplymouth.org/> <http://www.plymouthschools.com/> * Plympton <http://town.plympton.ma.us/> * Princeton <http://town.princeton.ma.us/> <http://library.town.princeton.ma.us/> * Provincetown <http://www.provincetown-ma.gov/> And Providnece is, I think cliose enough for inclusion as well. And that is just the towns. Plymouth is the only County in Mass with a P name, but Penobscott ME used to be part of MA, and should probably be in the running as well. On 05/02/2016 02:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote: Hi everyone, When will we name the P release of OpenStack? We named two releases simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle. This gave us the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata) releases. If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the location is now known) we would be able to have names associated with the current release cycle (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P). This would also allow us to get back to only voting for one name per release cycle but consistently have names for N, N+1, and N+2. Is there really going to be an option besides Plymouth? I remember something important happened there in 1620 ;-) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plymouth,_Massachusetts __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?
But, the original spelling of the landing site is Plimoth Rock. There were still highway signs up in the 70's directing folks to "Plimoth Rock" --Rocky Who should know about rocks ;-) -Original Message- From: Brian Haley [mailto:brian.ha...@hpe.com] Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 3:12 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release? On 05/02/2016 02:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote: > Hi everyone, > > When will we name the P release of OpenStack? We named two releases > simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle. This gave > us > the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata) releases. > > If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the location is > now > known) we would be able to have names associated with the current release > cycle > (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P). This would also allow us to get back to > only voting for one name per release cycle but consistently have names for N, > N+1, and N+2. Is there really going to be an option besides Plymouth? I remember something important happened there in 1620 ;-) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plymouth,_Massachusetts __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?
On 05/02/2016 02:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote: Hi everyone, When will we name the P release of OpenStack? We named two releases simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle. This gave us the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata) releases. If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the location is now known) we would be able to have names associated with the current release cycle (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P). This would also allow us to get back to only voting for one name per release cycle but consistently have names for N, N+1, and N+2. Is there really going to be an option besides Plymouth? I remember something important happened there in 1620 ;-) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plymouth,_Massachusetts __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 05/02/2016 01:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> When will we name the P release of OpenStack? We named two releases >> simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle. This >> gave us the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata) >> releases. >> >> If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the >> location is now known) we would be able to have names associated with >> the current release cycle (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P). This >> would also allow us to get back to only voting for one name per release >> cycle but consistently have names for N, N+1, and N+2. >> > > Patches already up ... > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/310425/ > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/310426/ Thanks Monty. Shouldn't we just starting naming one release again? This will give the community the names of the next three releases consistently... If we would for two of them at a time then we will have some periods where four names will be known and others where we might only know three (i.e. during Ocata). > > Monty > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Thanks, Shamail Tahir t: @ShamailXD tz: Eastern Time __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?
On 05/02/2016 01:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote: Hi everyone, When will we name the P release of OpenStack? We named two releases simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle. This gave us the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata) releases. If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the location is now known) we would be able to have names associated with the current release cycle (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P). This would also allow us to get back to only voting for one name per release cycle but consistently have names for N, N+1, and N+2. Patches already up ... https://review.openstack.org/#/c/310425/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/310426/ Monty __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?
Hi everyone, When will we name the P release of OpenStack? We named two releases simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle. This gave us the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata) releases. If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the location is now known) we would be able to have names associated with the current release cycle (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P). This would also allow us to get back to only voting for one name per release cycle but consistently have names for N, N+1, and N+2. -- Thanks, Shamail Tahir t: @ShamailXD tz: Eastern Time __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev