On 4 November 2015 at 09:28, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> lifeless had some proposals about managing stable requirements and
> constraints that he presented during the summit. We should get those
> written down before we start approving any changes.
The tl;dr is that we'd make a copy of upper-constrain
+1 Doug
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> lifeless had some proposals about managing stable requirements and
> constraints that he presented during the summit. We should get those
> written down before we start approving any changes.
>
> Doug
>
> Excerpts from Davanum Sriniva
lifeless had some proposals about managing stable requirements and
constraints that he presented during the summit. We should get those
written down before we start approving any changes.
Doug
Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2015-11-03 14:57:01 -0500:
> Matthew,
>
> There's a
On 11/03/2015 01:57 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> There's a failure in grenade - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232918/
> There's a fix in progress - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/240371/
>
> Once that gets released in oslo.reports. We should be able to unclog
> those updates
>
Matthew,
There's a failure in grenade - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232918/
There's a fix in progress - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/240371/
Once that gets released in oslo.reports. We should be able to unclog
those updates
thanks,
Dims
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Matthew Thode w
Are these constraints locked in place for the entire release cycle? It
doesn't look like the stable/liberty version has been updated since
release and it'd be nice if newer versions of the packages were tested,
specifically babel in my case (as we have to have users mask the newer,
stable version)
