On 2015-04-15 11:06:20 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote:
And the doc is indeed pretty clear. I assumed requirements.txt would
describe... well... requirements. But like Robert said they are meant to
describe specific deployments (should really be have been named
deployment.txt, or at least
Emilien Macchi wrote:
Hi all,
I sent a patch to openstack/governance to move our project under the big
tent, and it came up [1] that we should decide of a project name and be
careful about trademarks issues with Puppet name.
I would like to hear from Puppetlabs if there is any issue to use
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Ken Giusti wrote:
Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the 0-10 based
impl_qpid.py driver, correct? This is the driver that is used for
the qpid:// transport (aka rpc_backend).
I ask because I'm
On 04/12/2015 06:43 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
Right now we do something that upstream pip considers wrong: we make
our requirements.txt be our install_requires.
Upstream there are two separate concepts.
install_requirements, which are meant to document what *must* be
installed to import
Hi Matt,
I just re-read this thread, including your intro below. You might be
interested in what we're doing in the Calico project [1][2], as it uses
some of the same idea as the example you describe below, notably
importing TAP interface routes into bird and bird6.
[1]
1/ +1
2/ +1
3/ +1
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Aleksey Kasatkin akasat...@mirantis.com
wrote:
1/ +1
2/ +1
3/ +1
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Tatyana Leontovich
tleontov...@mirantis.com wrote:
3/ +1
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Sergii Golovatiuk
Hello Christopher,
I’m glad you are making progress. I’m including two folks that worked on the
KMIP plugin to see if they can help with your error diagnosis.
Thanks,
John
From: Christopher N Solis cnso...@us.ibm.commailto:cnso...@us.ibm.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
Miguel,
As a telco operator, who is active in the WG, I am absolutely an interested
party for QoS. I’d be willing to hop between the two of them if absolutely
necessary (it’s IRC, after all) but would prefer they not overlap if possible.
Thanks!
-Anthony
On Apr 15, 2015, at 6:39 , Miguel
Hi again Joe, (+ list)
On 11/04/15 02:00, joehuang wrote:
Hi, Neil,
See inline comments.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang
From: Neil Jerram [neil.jer...@metaswitch.com]
Sent: 09 April 2015 23:01
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Ok,
1) #openstack-meeting-2 doesn’t exist (-alt is it)
2) and not only that we’re colliding the TWG meeting,
but all the meeting rooms starting at UTC 14:30 are busy.
3) If we move -30m (UTC 13:30) then we could use meeting room
#openstack-meeting-3
before the neutron drivers
On 04/15/2015 10:46 AM, marios wrote:
On 15/04/15 00:13, James Slagle wrote:
Hi, TripleO currently has an alternate meeting time scheduled for
Wednesdays at 08:00 UTC. The alternate meeting actually hasn't
happened the last 4 occurrences that I know of [2].
Do we still need the alternate
Guys,
TL;DR: There will be upgrade tarball in 6.1. But it will not require any
data from 6.0.x branch. And there will be no upgrade tarball starting from
7.0.
Looks like we don't need upgrade tarball any more. It is a big relief for
our build team. Because GNU make is not intended to be used for
Hello,
Rally team is happy to say that we cut new release 0.0.3.
*Release stats:*
+--+-+
| Commits | 53|
+--+-+
| Bug fixes| 14|
+--+-+
| Dev cycle
On 2015-04-15 11:53:28 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
When I proposed removing the GridFS driver from glance_store, I asked
for feedback in other mailing lists and then came back here proposing
de dev removal.
Got it--so the recommendation is to not ask the developer community
Thanks Andrew and Fenghua. I see. The current docker-swarm template only
using heat to create a swarm cluster, I see you have many bps related to
this. ;-)
2015-04-15 23:13 GMT+08:00 FangFenghua fang_feng...@hotmail.com:
For docker-swam bay,I think the bay looks like a big machine have a
FRI
From: fang_feng...@hotmail.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:29:27 +
Subject: [openstack-dev] [magnum]
Apache Mesos maybe is a choice as a Magnum's Container backend.Now it native
support Docker contanier . I thinks magnum have aMesos bay is very
On Apr 15, 2015, at 10:00 , Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo mangel...@redhat.com
wrote:
Ok,
1) #openstack-meeting-2 doesn’t exist (-alt is it)
2) and not only that we’re colliding the TWG meeting,
but all the meeting rooms starting at UTC 14:30 are busy.
While not preferable, I don’t mind
FYI. We are going to disable Multi-node mode on UI even in experimental
mode. And we will remove related code from nailgun in 7.0.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1428054
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com
wrote:
What do you guys think about switching
if Puppet isn't possible, *Silhouette* looks very charming to me :)
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Richard Raseley rich...@raseley.com
wrote:
Emilien Macchi wrote:
Hi all,
I sent a patch to openstack/governance to move our project under the big
tent, and it came up [1] that we should
On 04/15/2015 08:22 AM, Qiao, Liyong wrote:
Hi all
Live migration an instance will fail due to invalid cpuset, more detail can be
find in this bug[1]
I actually reported the same issue back in February:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1417667
Chris
On 04/15/2015 03:22 AM, Akshik dbk wrote:
Hi,
would like to know if schedule filters are considered while instance
migration/evacuation.
If you migrate or evacuate without specifying a destination then the scheduler
filters will be considered.
Chris
I believe that, on the stable branch at least, we need to fix the
migrations so that upgrades are possible. This probably means fixing
them the same way on the master branch first and backporting the fixes
to stable/juno. All migrations that were present in the initial juno
release need to be
???Hi Jay,
Magnum Bays do not currently use the docker-swarm template. I'm working on a
patch to add support for the docker-swarm template. That is going to require a
new TemplateDefinition, and potentially some new config options and/or
Bay/BayModel parameters. After that, the Docker
For docker-swam bay,I think the bay looks like a big machine have a
docker-daemon.We can create container in it.
From: andrew.mel...@rackspace.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:53:39 +
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] How to use docker-swarm bay in
Maybe we can add a object mapping to docker-compose.
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 23:32:01 +0800
From: jay.lau@gmail.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] How to use docker-swarm bay in magnum
Thanks Andrew and Fenghua. I see. The current docker-swarm
Hi all
Live migration an instance will fail due to invalid cpuset, more detail can be
find in this bug[1]
this exception is raised by python-libvirt's migrateToURI2/ migrateToURI. I'd
like to get your idea on this:
1. disable live-migration and raise exception early since migrateToURI2/
Hi,
all, i know the kilo-rc 1 is released. I found an introduction about new
features here
http://www.slideshare.net/openstack/trove-juno-to-kilo
It says that we can fetch mysql error log. Then i search in the source code
on master branch, and i do not find the api. Can someone help me ?
Apache Mesos maybe is a choice as a Magnum's Container backend.Now it native
support Docker contanier . I thinks magnum have aMesos bay is very Cool.
__
OpenStack Development
Ok, during today’s preliminary meeting we talked about moving to
#openstack-meeting-3,
and we’re open to move -30m the meeting if it’s ok for everybody, to only
partly overlap with the TWG,
yet we could stay at 14:00 UTC for now.
I have updated both wikis to reflect the meeting room change (to
Do you mean single node?
On 15 Apr 2015, at 17:04, Dmitry Pyzhov dpyz...@mirantis.com wrote:
FYI. We are going to disable Multi-node mode on UI even in experimental mode.
And we will remove related code from nailgun in 7.0.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1428054
On Fri, Jan 30,
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 14/04/15 19:54 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 04/14/2015 07:26 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 14/04/15 23:18 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
I'd recommend sending this email to the ops mailing list
And I'd
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-14 16:54:30 -0700:
On 04/14/2015 07:26 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 14/04/15 23:18 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
I'd recommend sending this email to the ops mailing list
And
I have a couple proposals done up on paper that I'll have available
shortly, I'll reply with a link.
- Trevor J. Vardeman
- trevor.varde...@rackspace.com
- (210) 312 - 4606
On 4/14/15, 5:34 PM, Eichberger, German german.eichber...@hp.com wrote:
All,
Let's decide on a logo tomorrow so we
Tomasz, multi-node mode is a legacy non-HA mode with only 1
controller. Currently, our so-called HA mode support deployment with 1
controller, so it makes no sense to support both modes.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Tomasz Napierala
tnapier...@mirantis.com wrote:
Do you mean single node?
Neil Jerram wrote:
Hi again Joe, (+ list)
On 11/04/15 02:00, joehuang wrote:
Hi, Neil,
See inline comments.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang
From: Neil Jerram [neil.jer...@metaswitch.com]
Sent: 09 April 2015 23:01
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:37 AM, Guo, Ruijing ruijing@intel.com wrote:
I’d like to propose openwrt VM as service.
What’s openWRT VM as service:
a)Tenant can download openWRT VM from
http://downloads.openwrt.org/
b)Tenant can create WAN interface from
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-04-15 10:15:11 -0700:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-14 16:54:30 -0700:
It's time to be honest about the level of support that comes with those
other backends, deprecate the plugability, and move on to more
interesting problems.
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 09:31:18 -0400:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Ken Giusti wrote:
Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the 0-10 based
impl_qpid.py driver, correct? This is the driver that is used
Hi Li,
Unfortunately, fetching the logs didn't make it into kilo and is still an
ongoing project. It should make it into liberty, though. ;)
Regards,
Peter Stachowski
From: Li Tianqing [mailto:jaze...@163.com]
Sent: April-15-15 10:30 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject:
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-04-15 10:48:30 -0700:
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-04-15 10:15:11 -0700:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-14 16:54:30 -0700:
It's time to be honest about the level of support that comes with those
other
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 09:31:18 -0400:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Ken Giusti wrote:
Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the
On 04/14/2015 08:21 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Sean Dague wrote:
It's time to be honest about the level of support that comes with those
other backends, deprecate the plugability, and move on to more
interesting problems. We do have plenty of them to solve. :) Perhaps in
That’s the basic idea. Now, if you’re a reseller of cloud services, you deploy
Horizon+Aggregator/Keystone behind your public endpoint, with your branding on
Horizon. You then bind each of your Aggregator Regions to a Virtual Region from
one of your providers. As a reseller, you don’t actually
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-04-15 11:02:34 -0700:
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-04-15 10:48:30 -0700:
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-04-15 10:15:11 -0700:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-14 16:54:30 -0700:
It's time to be
So, an Aggregator would basically be a stripped down keystone that basically
provided a dynamic service catalog that points to the registered other regions?
You could then point a horizon, cli, or rest api at the aggregator service?
I guess if it was an identity provider too, it can
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-15 06:50:11 -0700:
== End game?
*If* pip install took into account the requirements of everything
already installed like apt or yum does, and resolve accordingly
(including saying that's not possible unless you uninstall or upgrade
X), we'd be
Hello,
I agree. IMHO it should be maybe something like *aaS deployed on VM. I
think that Octavia is something like that for LBaaS now.
Maybe it could be something like RouteraaS which will provide all such
functions in VM?
--
Best regards / Pozdrawiam
Sławek Kapłoński
sla...@kaplonski.pl
On
tl;dr We want to implement a new system which we’re calling an Aggregator which
is based on Horizon and Keystone, and that can provide access to virtual
Regions from multiple independent OpenStack providers. We plan on developing
this system as a project in Stackforge, but we need help right
Hi all,
Round the clock and around the world, we need to dedicate a day to triaging
doc bugs in anticipation of the Kilo release. I'd like to propose either
Tuesday April 21 or Thursday April 23.
All the details are here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/BugDay and I'll add the
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 14:08:57 -0400:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 09:31:18 -0400:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com
wrote:
Ken
On 04/15/2015 01:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-04-15 10:15:11 -0700:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-14 16:54:30 -0700:
It's time to be honest about the level of support that comes with those
other backends, deprecate the plugability,
On 14 April 2015 at 21:36, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On 13 April 2015 at 22:04, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
How does this proposal affect stable branches ? In order to keep the
breakage there under control, we now have stable branches for
Solum Electorate,
In accordance with tradition, we make an effort to delay our election until
after OpenStack PTL elections conclude. We planned to open our PTL Candidacy
today, and start an election on April 23, if one is required. Because the
OpenStack election was stopped and re-started
On 16 April 2015 at 00:51, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-04-15 11:06:20 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote:
And the doc is indeed pretty clear. I assumed requirements.txt would
describe... well... requirements. But like Robert said they are meant to
describe specific
On 04/15/2015 06:44 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 16 April 2015 at 01:50, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 04/12/2015 06:43 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
Thoughts? If there's broad apathy-or-agreement I can turn this into a
spec for fine coverage of ramifications and corner cases.
I'm
On 15 April 2015 at 09:33, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On 13 April 2015 at 22:04, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
How does this proposal affect stable branches ? In
On 15 April 2015 at 09:35, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 13 April 2015 at 12:53, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
If we pin the stable branches with hard pins of direct and indirect
On 16 April 2015 at 07:58, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-15 06:50:11 -0700:
== End game?
*If* pip install took into account the requirements of everything
already installed like apt or yum does, and resolve accordingly
(including saying
Hi everyone,
Just a quick reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
tomorrow Thursday, April 16th at 22:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel.
The agenda for tomorrow's meeting can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting
Anyone is welcome to
On 16 April 2015 at 01:50, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 04/12/2015 06:43 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
Thoughts? If there's broad apathy-or-agreement I can turn this into a
spec for fine coverage of ramifications and corner cases.
I'm definitely happy someone else is diving in on here,
To make it more clear, it depends on the release. Nova supports
evacuate instance without specifying a host since Juno. See
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88749/
On 16/04/15 03:16, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 04/15/2015 03:22 AM, Akshik dbk wrote:
Hi,
would like to know if schedule filters are
Sorry, I just mixed the names ;)
On 15 Apr 2015, at 18:25, Igor Kalnitsky ikalnit...@mirantis.com wrote:
Tomasz, multi-node mode is a legacy non-HA mode with only 1
controller. Currently, our so-called HA mode support deployment with 1
controller, so it makes no sense to support both modes.
We have already implement the default template for sahara
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/sahara/+spec/default-templates
2015-04-16 5:22 GMT+08:00 Liang, Yanchao yanli...@ebay.com:
Dear Openstack Developers,
My name is Yanchao Liang. I am a software engineer in eBay, working on
Hadoop as
Is there an official document to introduce the new features about trove
kilo-rc1?
--
Best
Li Tianqing
At 2015-04-16 02:15:11, Peter Stachowski pe...@tesora.com wrote:
Hi Li,
Unfortunately, fetching the logs didn’t make it into kilo and is still an
ongoing project. It
OpenStack Devs,
My apologies, I sent this request to you by mistake. Please accept my sincere
apology for the distraction.
Regards,
Adrian Otto
On Apr 15, 2015, at 6:21 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote:
...
In case it's helpful to see all the cases together, sync_routers (from the L3
agent) was also mentioned in other part of this thread. Plus of course the
liveness reporting from all agents.
In the test report [1], which shows Neutron can supports up to million level
ports and 100k level
Hi,
Just a suggestion, but if in that etherpad you could put the bug
subject/project, it’d help folks scan for relevant reviews. It’s a bit many
links to click through.
Thanks,
doug
On Apr 15, 2015, at 9:27 PM, Bhargava, Ruchi ruchi.bharg...@intel.com wrote:
Hello,
Parts of the
Hi,
In the API.py of /nova/compute/
We are checking for compute service status in evacuate(..) method.
if self.servicegroup_api.service_is_up(service):
msg = (_('Instance compute service state on %s '
'expected to be down, but it was up.') % inst_host)
Excerpts from Dan Prince's message of 2015-04-15 02:14:12 +:
I've been trying to cleanly model some Ceph and HA configurations in
tripleo-ci that use Puppet (we are quite close to having these things in
CI now!)
Turns out the environment variables needed for these things are getting
to
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:09:24PM EDT, Tom Fifield wrote:
On 16/04/15 10:54, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
Yes, but if stuff like dvr is the only viable replacement to
nova-network in production, then learning the non representitive config
of neutron with linuxbridge might be misleading/counter
Recently a mass of changes was proposed and some merged to move the
rabbit/kombu settings to avoid a Kilo deprecation. As far as I can tell
this will break rabbit connectivity for all modules still using Juno. I did
an experiment with Heat and it certainly can't talk to rabbit anymore.
(Hopefully
Yeah, we’ve taken account of:
https://github.com/openstack/keystone-specs/blob/master/specs/juno/keystone-to-keystone-federation.rst
https://github.com/openstack/keystone-specs/blob/master/specs/juno/keystone-to-keystone-federation.rst
On 14/04/15 23:36, Dean Troyer wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
mangel...@redhat.com mailto:mangel...@redhat.com wrote:
Why would operators install from devstack? that’s not going to be
the case.
If they do they need more help than we can give...
So,
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
If they do they need more help than we can give...
So, ummm, there is actually a valid use case for ops on devstack: it's
part of the learning process.
Yes, this is very true. The context in my mind included the
Yes, but if stuff like dvr is the only viable replacement to nova-network
in production, then learning the non representitive config of neutron with
linuxbridge might be misleading/counter productive since ovs looks very very
different.
Kevin
From: Tom
Hi,
Can someone please provide some info on how we are handling cumulative
counter resets for various scenarios in ceilometer ?
Seeing some old posts and bugs but couldn't find any references to fixes -
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1061817
Hello,
Parts of the OpenStack community in China recently joined together to focus on
bug fixing for Nova and Neutron. This is the 1st event of its kind for this
group and they are very excited to make this contribution. They identified 43
bugs to work on and have submitted patches for 29 of
Hi Chris,
Thanks for responding, I was under the understanding that the destination host
is manditory, Im using Icehouse version
nova help evacuateusage: nova evacuate [--password password]
[--on-shared-storage] server host
Evacuate server from failed host to specified one.
Rackers,
We are in the process of putting together comprehensive RackU training for
Rackers to learn about Docker at a few different levels. We want to be ahead of
the curve when our customers are ready to benefit from application containers.
1) Foundational training will give any Racker a
On 16 April 2015 at 11:59, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
I think the completeness statement here is as follows:
1. For OpenStack to scale to the small end, we need to be able to
overlap services, otherwise you are telling people they basically have
to start with a full rack of hardware to
On 16/04/15 10:54, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
Yes, but if stuff like dvr is the only viable replacement to
nova-network in production, then learning the non representitive config
of neutron with linuxbridge might be misleading/counter productive since
ovs looks very very different.
Sure, though
Hi,
I see 2 different timings for the meeting. One of them needs to be updated or
these are 2 different meetings ?
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#LBaaS_meeting
LBaaS meeting
* Weekly on Tuesdays at 1600 UTC
* IRC channel: #openstack-meeting-4
* Chair (to contact for
Ken Giusti wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Doug Hellmannd...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 09:31:18 -0400:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlowharlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Ken Giusti wrote:
Just to be clear: you're asking
Excerpts from Gregory Haynes's message of 2015-04-16 02:50:17 +:
Excerpts from Dan Prince's message of 2015-04-15 02:14:12 +:
I've been trying to cleanly model some Ceph and HA configurations in
tripleo-ci that use Puppet (we are quite close to having these things in
CI now!)
We need to update the version of PyECLib for Kilo[1]. This library is a
requirement for erasure coding in Swift.
In addition to fixing several bugs, 1.0.7 eliminates the need for some
work-around code in Swift. This code was only to hide
issues in the current version of PyECLib, but it also
On 04/15/2015 04:23 PM, Geoff Arnold wrote:
That’s the basic idea. Now, if you’re a reseller of cloud services, you deploy
Horizon+Aggregator/Keystone behind your public endpoint, with your branding on
Horizon. You then bind each of your Aggregator Regions to a Virtual Region from
one of
Sure, though on the other hand, doesn't current discussion seem to indicate
that OVS with DVR is not a viable replacement for nova-network multi-host HA
(eg due to complexity), and this is why folks were working towards linux
bridge?
Some openstacker doesn’t believe ovs performance is
Sounds like a very interesting idea.
Have you talked to the keystone folks?,
I would do this work into the keystone project itself (just a separate daemon).
This still looks like identity management (federated, but identity)
I know the burden of working with a mainstream project could be
Hi Ganesh,
The Tuesday meeting on -4 is the our slot, but it is suspended until further
notice while we experiment with covering our agenda during the neutron and
octavia meetings. If there ends up being a lot to cover, we will resume.
Is there something you need to discuss? Please feel free
We’ll have more details about this tomorrow, but the tl;dr is that in order to
make some of the release/requirements/test tools work properly we’ve gone ahead
and renamed proposed/kilo to stable/kilo. We have NOT cut RC2, and so the
stable/kilo branch should be treated as though it is still
On Apr 14, 2015, at 12:03, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
Our regular integration testing jobs do this by default. When a
change is proposed to a stable branch of a project, devstack-gate
checks out the same branch name for the other projects being tested
with it and updates
I think this work falls into the service VM category.
openwrt unlike other service VMs used for networking services (like
cloudstack's router vm) is very lightweight, and it's fairly easy to
provision such VMs on the fly. It should be easy also to integrate with a
ML2 control plane or even with
As a result of all of the excellent discussions here, I have produced a
spec for policy which I think will assist us all in moving forward on
improving the quality in this space:
https://review.openstack.org/174105
Thanks everyone for your excellent replies!
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message
Dear Openstack Developers,
My name is Yanchao Liang. I am a software engineer in eBay, working on Hadoop
as a Service on top of Openstack cloud.
Right now we are using Sahara, Juno version. We want to stay current and
introduce global template into sahara.
In order to simplify the cluster
Ok, I will create a bug so that I don't forget (this kind of changes
does not require a spec, does it?).
On 04/15/2015 01:59 AM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Yea, option #2 is what I had in mind. Like you said, I think most of
the code is already present in Ironic, and if it's not already
Hi Vikram,
I am very interested in this, however can't do everything for free!
I believe that bird would be a better fit than Zebra/Quagga, as it is
just 2 processes to be launched in a network namespace. Also they are
very accessible/reloadable via the birdc/birdc6 control binaries that
lends
I prefer to the sub-state with a bit more detail. It will be simple for
horizon or others to get the more detail error message from cinder.
Maybe we can define some template messages(according to kinds of error
reason, more general) to avoid specify driver info back to end user.
2015-04-14 0:24
Excerpts from Dan Prince's message of 2015-04-13 14:07:28 -0700:
On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 21:06 +, Gregory Haynes wrote:
Hello,
Id like to propse a standard for consistently documenting our
diskimage-builder elements. I have pushed a review which transforms
the apt-sources
Thanks Ivar for tracking this and bringing it up for discussion. I am
good with taking approach (1).
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Ivar Lazzaro ivarlazz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Team,
As per discussion in the latest GBP meeting [0] I'm hunting down all the
backward incompatible changes
I’d like to propose openwrt VM as service.
What’s openWRT VM as service:
a)Tenant can download openWRT VM from http://downloads.openwrt.org/
b)Tenant can create WAN interface from external public network
c)Tenant can create private network and create instance
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
