[openstack-dev] [puppet]puppet-mistral

Hi all, I have some changes at the end of last week and so far i got no comment on it. can anyone please take a look? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208457/10 Thanks Thanks Limor Stotland ALCATEL-LUCENT SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER CLOUDBAND BUSINESS UNIT 16 Atir Yeda St. Kfar-Saba 44643, ISRAEL

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Obtain the objects from the bay endpoint

Hi, I have a few questions. inline. > Problem :- > > Currently objects (pod/rc/service) are read from the database. In order > for native clients to work, they must be read from the ReST bay endpoint. > To execute native clients, we must have one truth of the state of the > system, not two as i

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Aligning LP groups with real teams

Hi, just wanted to let you know that fuel-astute and fuel-provisioning groups have been removed from LP. > BTW, any chance we can somehow to reduce spam emails when some bug was assigned to another team? Igor, I'd recommend to setup email filters and lables. There are messages like "You received

[openstack-dev] [nova] Mitaka nova-specs is open?

Hi Nova Devs, I have submitted a nova-specs for liberty but as it is not approved I have moved it under liberty/backlog. Now mitaka specs directory is added in nova-specs. Should it be ok to move nova-specs from specs/liberty/backlog/approved to specs/mitaka/approved directory? Please let me k

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Glance] glance_store and glance

> -Original Message- > From: Mike Perez [mailto:thin...@gmail.com] > Sent: 11 August 2015 19:04 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Glance] glance_store and > glance > > On 15:06 Aug 11, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bug *Review* Day - Liberty

Today is bug review day, wohoo! Would be great if we shift our review focus today to patch sets for bugs with a high priority. If you have questions, contact me (markus_z) or another member of the nova bug team [1] on IRC #openstack-nova. Regards, Markus Zoeller (markus_z) [1] https://launchpad.

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

Matt Riedemann wrote: > Just an update: > > Kilo: I think we are OK here now, at least for some projects like nova - > raising the minimum required neutronclient to >=2.4.0 seems to have > fixed things. > > Juno: We're still blocked on the large ops job: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [infra] Race conditions in fwaas that impact the gate

[reformatted and infra tag added] On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 07:32:34PM EDT, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > On 12 August 2015 at 00:21, Sean M. Collins wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Today has been an exciting day, to say the least. Earlier today I was > > pinged on IRC about some firewall as a service u

Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support

Gary Kotton wrote: > > On 8/12/15, 12:12 AM, "Mike Perez" wrote: >> On 15:39 Aug 11, Gary Kotton wrote: >>> On 8/11/15, 6:09 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote: >>> Are you saying that *new functionality* was added to the stable/kilo branch of *Neutron*, and because new functionality was added to >

[openstack-dev] Does murano dymamic-ui have plan to support "edit" function?

Dear OpenStack developers, Currently, murano dynamic-ui is "one-time" GUI, and I can't edit data what has been submitted. Does murano dynamic-ui have plan to support "edit" function in the future? For example, developer develops some Wizard GUI to do some configuration, and user wants to change

Re: [openstack-dev] ][third-party-ci]Running custom code before tests

Hi, Found some more info (finally): i added a function in the script part in the jenkins job and an export -f and it seems it's being called, so now my backend is installed and configured. I'm now trying to configure cinder to use my driver when running but i couldn't find a way to configure it.

Re: [openstack-dev] Does murano dymamic-ui have plan to support "edit" function?

Hi, sure there are such plans! This have been long referred as per-component-UI. I’m really hoping there would be some traction about it during mitaka cycle. Not in liberty though, feature freeze is less than a month away. btw, if you’re interested in custom tweaking and fine-tuning of murano

Re: [openstack-dev] Does murano dymamic-ui have plan to support "edit" function?

Kirll, Thanks for your info very much! We will study it first. Thanks, Tony From: Kirill Zaitsev [mailto:kzait...@mirantis.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 7:12 PM To: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T); OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Does mu

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Mitaka nova-specs is open?

Kekane, Abhishek said on Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 08:59:02AM +: > I have submitted a nova-specs for liberty but as it is not approved I have > moved it under liberty/backlog. > > Now mitaka specs directory is added in nova-specs. > Should it be ok to move nova-specs from specs/liberty/backlog/app

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [infra] Race conditions in fwaas that impact the gate

On 12 August 2015 at 21:57, Sean M. Collins wrote: > [reformatted and infra tag added] > > ... > [2]: http://pytest.org/latest/skipping.html https://docs.python.org/2/library/unittest.html#skipping-tests-and-expected-failures will be more helpful, as we're using testtools (which is a layer on un

Re: [openstack-dev] ][third-party-ci]Running custom code before tests

Hi, You can something like this - https://github.com/openstack-infra/project-config/blob/master/jenkins/jobs/devstack-gate.yaml#L2201 On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Eduard Matei < eduard.ma...@cloudfounders.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Found some more info (finally): i added a function in the script

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]Weekly Team Meeting 2015.08.12 Agenda

Hi Team, We will continue to have our regular meeting today. The agenda for today would be: 1. local/bottom cascade service design 2. gampel to have a list of resources that need to be retrieved so we can check if it can be done by tenant context in the design work on resource mapping

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Liberty-3 BPs and gerrit topics

Kyle, Is the dashboard available to a limited set of users? curious by nature tried to access it and it said "Session expired, please login again" however i thought i don't have to login to Gerrit, am i missing something? Cheers, Dani On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > Fol

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Liberty-3 BPs and gerrit topics

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Daniel Comnea wrote: > Kyle, > > Is the dashboard available to a limited set of users? curious by nature > tried to access it and it said "Session expired, please login again" > however i thought i don't have to login to Gerrit, am i missing something? > > You wil

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Liberty-3 BPs and gerrit topics

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > Folks: > > To make reviewing all approved work for Liberty-3 in Neutron easier, I've > created a handy dandy gerrit dashboard [1]. What will make this even more > useful is if everyone makes sure to set their topics to something uniform > fro

Re: [openstack-dev] [Monasca] Minutes for Monasca mid-cycle meetup

On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Hochmuth, Roland M wrote: It sounds like we should connect up soon. I could attend a Ceilometer meeting, or you could attend the Monasca meeting which is held Tuesday mornings at 9:00 MST. I'm away this coming Tuesday, but perhaps some of the other Ceilo people could show

[openstack-dev] [neutron] I am pleased to propose two new Neutron API/DB/RPC core reviewers!

It gives me great pleasure to propose Russell Bryant and Brandon Logan as core reviewers in the API/DB/RPC area of Neutron. Russell and Brandon have both been incredible contributors to Neutron for a while now. Their expertise has been particularly helpful in the area they are being proposed in. Th

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] I am pleased to propose two new Neutron API/DB/RPC core reviewers!

+1 to both! On Wed, Aug 12, 2015, Kyle Mestery wrote: > It gives me great pleasure to propose Russell Bryant and Brandon Logan as core > reviewers in the API/DB/RPC area of Neutron. Russell and Brandon have both > been > incredible contributors to Neutron for a while now. Their expertise has bee

[openstack-dev] [cinder]Cinder creates encrypted volume from image

Hi all, Currently when cinder creates a volume with an encrypted volume type from an image(which is unencrypted), it just reads data from image, and writes them Into the volume. As a result the encrypted volume contains unencrypted data, and Nova fails to boot from the volume. https://bugs.launc

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] I am pleased to propose two new Neutron API/DB/RPC core reviewers!

+1 On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Henry Gessau wrote: > +1 to both! > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015, Kyle Mestery wrote: > > It gives me great pleasure to propose Russell Bryant and Brandon Logan > as core > > reviewers in the API/DB/RPC area of Neutron. Russell and Brandon have > both been > > incr

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] I am pleased to propose two new Neutron API/DB/RPC core reviewers!

+1 and +1 Great addition to the team! Edgar From: Kyle Mestery Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 6:45 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] I am pleased t

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][dvr][ha] DVR-HA router is not working.

Adding the author of the patches. This reinforces the need to hold on merging these patches until they have an in-tree integration test. On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Korzeniewski, Artur < artur.korzeniew...@intel.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I’ve been playing around with DVR-HA patches [1][2], have

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] I am pleased to propose two new Neutron API/DB/RPC core reviewers!

+1 for both On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Edgar Magana wrote: > +1 and +1 > > Great addition to the team! > > Edgar > > From: Kyle Mestery > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 6:45 AM > To: "OpenStack Development Mail

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove]Implement the API to create master instance and slave instances with one request

As of Kilo, you can add a ―replica-count parameter to trove create ―replica-of to have it spin up multiple mysql slaves simultaneously. This same construct is in the python/REST API as well. I realize that you still need to create a master first, but thought I would point this out as it might be

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] I am pleased to propose two new Neutron API/DB/RPC core reviewers!

+1 From: Anna Kamyshnikova mailto:akamyshnik...@mirantis.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 5:14 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] I am pleased to pro

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] I am pleased to propose two new Neutron API/DB/RPC core reviewers!

Well, actually +2 as there are 2 nominations. :) From: Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 5:23 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Liberty-2 dev milestone has been released

Hi, Mistral Liberty-2 development milestone has been released. Look at release page [1] to find detailed info about implemented blueprints and fixed bugs. [1] https://launchpad.net/mistral/liberty/liberty-2 Thanks! Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis I

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Cinder creates encrypted volume from image

That's a bug! I'm not aware of anybody working on it, and I don't see any old bugs open for it. A suitable fix would be very welcome On 12 Aug 2015 14:54, "Li, Xiaoyan" wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently when cinder creates a volume with an encrypted volume type from > an image(which is unencrypted)

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Mistral Client 1.0.1 has been released

Hi, Mistral Client (Python API and CLI) version 1.0.1 has been released. It contains changes needed for Python 3.4 compatibility and a number of bug fixes. [1] https://launchpad.net/python-mistralclient/liberty/1.0.1 Thanks Renat Akhm

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] I am pleased to propose two new Neutron API/DB/RPC core reviewers!

A big +1 to both!! Doug > On Aug 12, 2015, at 6:45 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > > It gives me great pleasure to propose Russell Bryant and Brandon Logan as > core reviewers in the API/DB/RPC area of Neutron. Russell and Brandon have > both been incredible contributors to Neutron for a while no

Re: [openstack-dev] In memory joins in Nova

On 8/11/15 7:14 PM, Sachin Manpathak wrote: I am struggling with python code profiling in general. It has its own caveats like 100% plus overhead. However, on a host with only nova services (DB on a different host), I see cpu utilization spike up quickly with scale. The DB server is relativel

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [docs] Security Guide Freeze and RST migration - Complete

All, The RST migration has completed, and the freeze is lifted, all incoming patches will need to be in RST format. Thanks to the Docs team - especially Andreas - for the awesome support! Thanks again, Nathaniel > On Jul 21, 2015, at 7:46 AM, Dillon, Nathaniel > wrote: > > All, > > The Op

Re: [openstack-dev] In memory joins in Nova

> If OTOH we are referring to the width of the columns and the join is > such that you're going to get the same A identity over and over again, > if you join A and B you get a "wide" row with all of A and B with a very > large amount of redundant data sent over the wire again and again (note > tha

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Mitaka nova-specs is open?

On 12 August 2015 at 12:20, Alexis Lee wrote: > Kekane, Abhishek said on Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 08:59:02AM +: >> I have submitted a nova-specs for liberty but as it is not approved I have >> moved it under liberty/backlog. >> >> Now mitaka specs directory is added in nova-specs. >> Should it be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Glance] glance_store and glance

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Mike Perez [mailto:thin...@gmail.com] >> Sent: 11 August 2015 19:04 >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Glance] glance_store

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Obtain the objects from the bay endpoint

From: Akash Gangil mailto:akashg1...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 1:37 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-de

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] I am pleased to propose two new Neutron API/DB/RPC core reviewers!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 08/12/2015 03:45 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > It gives me great pleasure to propose Russell Bryant and Brandon > Logan as core reviewers in the API/DB/RPC area of Neutron. Russell > and Brandon have both been incredible contributors to Neutron for a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] I am pleased to propose two new Neutron API/DB/RPC core reviewers!

Is this an example of +1+1=3? On 12 August 2015 at 07:51, Doug Wiegley wrote: > A big +1 to both!! > > Doug > > > > On Aug 12, 2015, at 6:45 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > > It gives me great pleasure to propose Russell Bryant and Brandon Logan as > core reviewers in the API/DB/RPC area of Neutron.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][dvr][ha] DVR-HA router is not working.

I have checked that: 1) the router_gateway is configured properly on network node (in namespace and in OVS), but the port is not reported as UP to controller node. Also, the ARP is not performed so no-one from external network is aware of the gateway address. When I ping from the GW to external

[openstack-dev] [Compass] Call for contributors

Hi OpenStackers, Compass is not new to OpenStack community. We started it as an OpenStack deployment tool at the HongKong summit. We then showcased it at the Paris summit. However, the project has gone through some changes recently. We'd like to re-introduce Compass and welcome new developers to

[openstack-dev] [Compass] Regarding Ansible Playbook vs upstream repo

[+ openstack-dev as suggested] Steven, Thank you for the candid comments and suggestions! We are revising our mission to be openstack-centric as we plan our next phase. We will follow the suggested steps by you and other TC reviewers that make sense for our project. On the specific question on A

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [docs] Security Guide Freeze and RST migration - Complete

Hi and congrats on the conversion! At your next meeting can you discuss the Lulu PDF for sale? I don't have bandwidth to test PDT output for compatibility with Lulu but you can talk about if it's worth the effort to test. Thanks, Anne > On Aug 12, 2015, at 10:12 AM, Dillon, Nathaniel > wro

Re: [openstack-dev] [Compass] Call for contributors

A big +1 from me, Weidong, for reaching out to the OpenStack community and embracing it. I look forward to seeing the Compass developer community *collaborating* with OSAD, the OpenStack Chef community, and other projects, like Ironic. Best, -jay On 08/12/2015 12:23 PM, Weidong Shao wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] [Horizon] Federated Login

On 11/08/2015 01:46, Jamie Lennox wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> From: "Jamie Lennox" To: "OpenStack >> Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >> Sent: Tuesday, 11 August, 2015 >> 10:09:33 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] [Horizon] >> Federated Login >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] Does murano dymamic-ui have plan to support "edit" function?

Hi Tony, Thanks for your interest! This is a complicated topic. Being able to edit the object model (with DynamicUI, the CLI tools mentioned by Kirill or manually with murano's API) is just the tip of the iceberg: if you have already deployed your application, modifying of some of its input prope

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] I am pleased to propose two new Neutron API/DB/RPC core reviewers!

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 08/12/2015 03:45 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > > It gives me great pleasure to propose Russell Bryant and Brandon > > Logan as core reviewers in the API/DB/RPC area of Neutron. Russell

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][nova] Streamlining of config options in nova

Another thing which makes it hard to understand the impact of the config options is, that it's not clear how the interdependency to other config options is. As an example, the "serial_console.base_url" has a dependency to "DEFAULT.cert" and "DEFAULT.key" if you want to use secured websockets ("b

Re: [openstack-dev] [TaskFlow] Cross-run persistence

> On Aug 10, 2015, at 1:18 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > > Is that what u are looking for? (or possibly something else?), Hi Josh, Thanks for the reply. I haven’t had time to dig into it much further, but I’m not sure that’s what I’m looking for (unless I’m missing something in initial configur

Re: [openstack-dev] Does murano dymamic-ui have plan to support "edit" function?

Hi Tony,  After re-readng your question again I tend to agree with Alex. Actions seem to be exactly what you’re asking for. --  Kirill Zaitsev Murano team Software Engineer Mirantis, Inc On 12 Aug 2015 at 20:16:08, Alexander Tivelkov (ativel...@mirantis.com) wrote: Hi Tony, Thanks for your

Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support

Apologies to go back in time in the tread, but I wanted to share some extra context... On 10 August 2015 at 16:17, Gary Kotton wrote: > I agree that the sub team(s) need to review more. > > The question is how do the team member feel like they are making progress? > That is, do they see patches >

Re: [openstack-dev] [app-catalog][heat] Heat template contributors repo

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Steve Baker wrote: > On 07/08/15 06:56, Fox, Kevin M wrote: >> >> Heat templates so far seems to be a place to dump examples for showing off >> how to use specific heat resources/features. >> >> Are there any intentions to maintain production ready heat templates in

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][keystone] Federation beyond Shibboleth

On 08/11/2015 06:21 AM, Jesse Pretorius wrote: Hi everyone, Yesterday we released implementing Keystone as a Federated Service Provider as part of the openstack-ansible deployment tooling [1]. This is a starting implementation which was purposefully scoped to only use Shibboleth and only sup

Re: [openstack-dev] In memory joins in Nova

Thanks, This feedback was helpful. Perhaps my paraphrasing was misleading. I am not running openstack at scale in order to see how much the DB can sustain. My observation was that the host running nova services saturates on CPU much earlier than the DB does. Joins could be one of the reasons. I als

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] [Horizon] Federated Login

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:06 PM, David Chadwick wrote: > > > On 11/08/2015 01:46, Jamie Lennox wrote: > > > > > > - Original Message - > >> From: "Jamie Lennox" To: "OpenStack > >> Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > >> Sent: Tuesday, 11 August, 2015 > >> 10:09:33 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

On 8/12/2015 4:42 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Matt Riedemann wrote: Just an update: Kilo: I think we are OK here now, at least for some projects like nova - raising the minimum required neutronclient to >=2.4.0 seems to have fixed things. Juno: We're still blocked on the large ops job: https:

[openstack-dev] [rally] [Ceilometer] profiler sample resource id

We're in the process of converting existing meters to use a more declarative approach where we add the meter definition as part of a yaml. As part of this transition there are few notification handlers where the id is not consistent. For example, in profiler notification Handler the resource_id is

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][nova] Streamlining of config options in nova

On 08/12/2015 01:20 PM, Markus Zoeller wrote: The three questions I have with every config option: 1) which service(s) access this option? 2) what does it do? / what's the impact? 3) which other options do I need to tweek to get the described impact? All excellent questions that really should

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][nova] Streamlining of config options in nova

On 08/12/2015 02:23 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 08/12/2015 01:20 PM, Markus Zoeller wrote: > >> The three questions I have with every config option: >> 1) which service(s) access this option? >> 2) what does it do? / what's the impact? >> 3) which other options do I need to tweek to get the describe

Re: [openstack-dev] In memory joins in Nova

On 8/12/15 1:49 PM, Sachin Manpathak wrote: Thanks, This feedback was helpful. Perhaps my paraphrasing was misleading. I am not running openstack at scale in order to see how much the DB can sustain. My observation was that the host running nova services saturates on CPU much earlier than th

Re: [openstack-dev] [app-catalog][heat] Heat template contributors repo

While being able to write kind of stand alone templates for apps is the goal, any sufficiently complicated cloud app template starts to benefit from shared components. If you look at a bunch of the templates that are in: https://github.com/EMSL-MSC/heat-templates/tree/master/cfn They are more an

Re: [openstack-dev] [TaskFlow] Cross-run persistence

On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:31:03 -0700 Demian Brecht wrote: > > > On Aug 10, 2015, at 1:18 PM, Joshua Harlow > > wrote: > > > > Is that what u are looking for? (or possibly something else?), > > Hi Josh, > > Thanks for the reply. I haven’t had time to dig into it much further, > but I’m not sure

[openstack-dev] [neutron][qos] request to merge feature/qos back into master

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, with great pleasure, I want to request a coordinated review for merging feature/qos branch back to master: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/212170/ Since it's a merge patch, gerrit fails to show the whole diff that it introduces into maste

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qos] request to merge feature/qos back into master

If you want a quick visual diff of this, you can click on "Files changed" here: https://github.com/openstack/neutron/compare/feature/qos On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi all, > > with great pleasure, I want to req

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][nova] Streamlining of config options in nova

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 4:29 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 08/12/2015 02:23 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > > On 08/12/2015 01:20 PM, Markus Zoeller wrote: > > > >> The three questions I have with every config option: > >> 1) which service(s) access this option? > >> 2) what does it do? / what's the impact?

[openstack-dev] [stable][cinder] taskflow 0.6.1 breaking cinder py26 in stable/juno

Bug reported here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/taskflow/+bug/1484267 We need a 0.6.2 release of taskflow from stable/juno with the g-r caps (for networkx specifically) to unblock the cinder py26 job in stable/juno. -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann _

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] [Horizon] Federated Login

Hi Jamie I have been thinking some more about your Coke and Pepsi use case example, and I think it is a somewhat spurious example, for the following reasons: 1. If Coke and Pepsi are members of the SAME federation, then they trust each other (by definition). Therefore they would not and could not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] [Horizon] Federated Login

Hi Lance On 12/08/2015 18:55, Lance Bragstad wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:06 PM, David Chadwick > mailto:d.w.chadw...@kent.ac.uk>> wrote: > > > > On 11/08/2015 01:46, Jamie Lennox wrote: > > > > > > - Original Message - > >> From: "Jamie Lennox"

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][cinder] taskflow 0.6.1 breaking cinder py26 in stable/juno

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Bug reported here: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/taskflow/+bug/1484267 > > We need a 0.6.2 release of taskflow from stable/juno with the g-r caps (for > networkx specifically) to unblock the cinder py26 job in stable/juno. Josh Harlow is o

[openstack-dev] [app-catalog] No IRC meeting this week

We are planning to push the meeting until next week. If anyone has any specific topic they would like to discuss though, please respond here and we can hold the meeting as normally planned. Otherwise, join us on IRC (#openstack-app-catalog) any time! -Christopher ___

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty SPFE Request - IDP Specific WebSSO

Hey all, I'd like to propose a spec proposal freeze exception for IDP Specific WebSSO [0]. This topic has been discussed, in length, on the mailing list [1], where this spec has been referenced as a possible solution [2]. This would allow for multiple Identity Providers to use the same protocol.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Brocade CI

Mike, Thanks for your feedback and suggestions. I had send my response yesterday but looks like didn't get posted on the lists.openstack.org. Hence posting it here again. We reviewed your comments and following issues were identified and some of them are fixed and some fix plans in progress: 1)

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][cinder] taskflow 0.6.1 breaking cinder py26 in stable/juno

On 13 August 2015 at 10:31, Mike Perez wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Matt Riedemann > wrote: >> Bug reported here: >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/taskflow/+bug/1484267 >> >> We need a 0.6.2 release of taskflow from stable/juno with the g-r caps (for >> networkx specifically) to unbl

[openstack-dev] [Compass] [Meeting] Weekly Meeting Agenda

On openstack-meeting-4 starting soon (6PDT today) Today's tentative agenda: 1) Ansible playbook and upstream 2) Blueprint review Weidong __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] [Horizon] Federated Login

- Original Message - > From: "David Chadwick" > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Sent: Thursday, 13 August, 2015 3:06:46 AM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] [Horizon] Federated Login > > > > On 11/08/2015 01:46, Jamie Lennox wrote: > > > > > > - Original Message

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Gerrit dashboard update: ready for core reviewers, disagreements

Fuelers, I've proposed an update for the Fuel gerrit dashboard: https://review.openstack.org/212231 New "Ready for Core Reviewers" section encourages peer review by non-cores and allows cores to focus on reviews that already have +1 from other reviews and from CI. New "Disagreements" section hig

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] [Horizon] Federated Login

- Original Message - > From: "David Chadwick" > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Sent: Thursday, 13 August, 2015 7:46:54 AM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] [Horizon] Federated Login > > Hi Jamie > > I have been thinking some more about your Coke and Pepsi use case > ex

Re: [openstack-dev] In memory joins in Nova

Excerpts from Dan Smith's message of 2015-08-12 23:12:23 +0800: > > If OTOH we are referring to the width of the columns and the join is > > such that you're going to get the same A identity over and over again, > > if you join A and B you get a "wide" row with all of A and B with a very > > large

Re: [openstack-dev] In memory joins in Nova

On 8/12/15 10:29 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Dan Smith's message of 2015-08-12 23:12:23 +0800: If OTOH we are referring to the width of the columns and the join is such that you're going to get the same A identity over and over again, if you join A and B you get a "wide" row with all

Re: [openstack-dev] In memory joins in Nova

> In the past I've taken a different approach to problematic one to > many relationships and have made the metadata a binary JSON blob. Is > there some reason that won't work? We have done that for various pieces of data that were previously in system_metadata. Where this breaks down is if you ne

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum]problems for horizontal scale

any comments on this? On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:50 PM, 王华 wrote: > Hi All, > > In order to prevent race conditions due to multiple conductors, my > solution is as blew: > 1. remove the db operation in bay_update to prevent race conditions.Stack > operation is atomic. Db operation is atomic. But

Re: [openstack-dev] In memory joins in Nova

Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2015-08-13 11:03:32 +0800: > > On 8/12/15 10:29 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Excerpts from Dan Smith's message of 2015-08-12 23:12:23 +0800: > >>> If OTOH we are referring to the width of the columns and the join is > >>> such that you're going to get the same A

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Gerrit dashboard update: ready for core reviewers, disagreements

test On 08/12/2015 07:16 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote: > Fuelers, > > I've proposed an update for the Fuel gerrit dashboard: > https://review.openstack.org/212231 > > New "Ready for Core Reviewers" section encourages peer review by > non-cores and allows cores to focus on reviews that already have

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove]Implement the API to create masterinstance and slave instances with one request

Thanks Doug. It's really helpful and we need this feature as well. Can you point out the bp or patch of this? I think we will add "--replica-count" parameter within trove create request. So trove-api will create trove instance(aync create nova instance) and then create some replica trove ins

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qos] request to merge feature/qos back into master

On 08/12/2015 09:55 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi all, with great pleasure, I want to request a coordinated review for merging feature/qos branch back to master: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/212170/ Great! Please send also a patch for project-config to remove the special handling of tha

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum]problems for horizontal scale

Hi Hua, I have some comments about this: A> remove heat poller can be a way, but some of its logic needs to make sure it work and performance not burden. 1) for old heat poller it is quick loop, with fixed interval, to make sure stack status update quickly can be reflected in bay status 2) for p

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] I am pleased to propose two new Neutron API/DB/RPC core reviewers!

+1 for both. 2015-08-12 22:45 GMT+09:00 Kyle Mestery : > It gives me great pleasure to propose Russell Bryant and Brandon Logan as > core reviewers in the API/DB/RPC area of Neutron. Russell and Brandon have > both been incredible contributors to Neutron for a while now. Their > expertise has bee

Re: [openstack-dev] [Compass] Call for contributors

On 12 August 2015 at 17:23, Weidong Shao wrote: > > Compass is not new to OpenStack community. We started it as an OpenStack > deployment tool at the HongKong summit. We then showcased it at the Paris > summit. > > However, the project has gone through some changes recently. We'd like to > re-int

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr] - Update Status

Hello everyone, I would like to give a short status update on Kuryr [1]. The project is starting to formalize, we already conducted two IRC meetings [2] to define the project first goals and road map goals, check the meetings logs and the agenda here [3] I think we see good amount of interest fr

[openstack-dev] [Tempest] Can we add testcase for download image v2?

Hi, While going through the tempest code, I have found that image-download v2 api test is missing in tempest. Can I add the api test for the same? Please suggest? Also glance task import API related testcases are also not there in tempest. Is it ok if I add tests for the same? Thanks ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Puppet] Keystone V2/V3 service endpoints

Hi Matthew, On 11/08/15 01:14, Rich Megginson wrote: > On 08/10/2015 07:46 AM, Matthew Mosesohn wrote: >> Sorry to everyone for bringing up this old thread, but it seems we may >> need more openstackclient/keystone experts to settle this. >> >> I'm referring to the comments in https://review.opens

Re: [openstack-dev] ][third-party-ci]Running custom code before tests

Hi, I think you pointed me to the wrong file, the devstack-gate yaml (and line 2201 contains "timestamps"). I need an example of how to configure tempest to use my driver. I tried EXPORT in the jenkins job (before executing dsvm shell script) but looking at the tempest.txt (log) it shows that it