Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Distributed Database

On Sunday, April 24, 2016, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Apr 23, 2016, at 11:33 PM, Mike Bayer > > wrote: > > > > Facebook and LinkedIn have built distributed database systems based on > MySQL at profoundly massive scales. Openstack's problem I'm going to

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Discussing DLMs in the Unplugged Track

I'll try to be there as well, since I know a little bit about tooz ;) -Josh Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, I suggest that you speak with Kobi Samoray - he implemented this for the vmware_nsx repository using tooz. Its pretty cool. Thanks Gary On 4/23/16, 5:16 PM, "John

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron lib hack has broken all decomposed projects

Another example is Lbaas - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/309766/ I have posted https://review.openstack.org/309770 Its either that or we skip the current neutron-lib in the requirements file. Neutron lib cores please look ASAP as the whole community is kind of stuck at the moment… From:

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-manuals] What the status of DocImpact

Excerpts from ZhiQiang Fan's message of 2016-04-24 08:00:10 +0800: > Hi Doc Team, > > I want to know the recent status of DocImpact tag, is it deprecated for > config option changes now? If it's true, then what the workflow for config > reference now, any hint or link? > > Previously, when a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Change 247669: Ceph Puppet: implement per-pool parameters:

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 08:00:02AM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > > Hi TripleO Team, > > > > If you could take care of ${subject}, it would be nice. > > > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/247669 > > > > Well, the

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Seek advices for a licence issue

Yes, I will contribute to this project. Thanks On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > Jay, > > > > I will discuss the proposal [1] in the design summit. Do you plan to > contribute on this efforts or someone from DCOS community interest to > contribute? > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-manuals] What the status of DocImpact

but Document Team has so beautiful tables, and so convenient tools , it is a huge waste of resource if we manually write it to release note in each project. So I want to figure out what have happened to prevent Document Team continuing previous workflow. Thanks On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 8:54 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes] Introducing the Kubernetes OpenStack Special Interest Group

- Original Message - > From: "Zhipeng Huang" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > > Hi Ihor, > > This is a great news ! As a matter of fact at the moment the Tricircle team > from OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron lib hack has broken all decomposed projects

Hi, Commit 4b17f1da1a5f65f0c4db395034ed732174a19315 has broken the pep8 of all of the decomposed projects. Do we need this hacking check? Can we have it reverted An example of this is - OVN - http://logs.openstack.org/35/299835/3/check/gate-networking-ovn-pep8/3ad066e/console.html Thanks Gary

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Discussing DLMs in the Unplugged Track

Hi, I suggest that you speak with Kobi Samoray - he implemented this for the vmware_nsx repository using tooz. Its pretty cool. Thanks Gary On 4/23/16, 5:16 PM, "John Schwarz" wrote: >Hi guys, > >I'm interested in discussing the DLM RFE [1] during the unplugged >track

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron lib hack has broken all decomposed projects

Revert has merged. Thanks and enjoy the summit From: Henry Gessau > Reply-To: OpenStack List > Date: Sunday, April 24, 2016 at 6:33 PM To: OpenStack List

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-manuals] What the status of DocImpact

Thank you, Sir! On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 04/24/2016 11:12 AM, ZhiQiang Fan wrote: > >> Hi Lana, >> >> Thank you for explaining it! >> >> Yes, I noticed that the DocImpact bug track now has shifted to project >> its own, that why I submit a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron lib hack has broken all decomposed projects

Reverted the neutron change that started using this, which is the quickest path to unbreaking the children. We’ll have to unwind those child projects first. doug > On Apr 24, 2016, at 8:09 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > > Another example is Lbaas -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron lib hack has broken all decomposed projects

That revert is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/309776 , and is working its way through CI now. About to lose connectivity for my flight to the summit… doug > On Apr 24, 2016, at 9:24 AM, Doug Wiegley > wrote: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-manuals] What the status of DocImpact

Hi Lana, Thank you for explaining it! Yes, I noticed that the DocImpact bug track now has shifted to project its own, that why I submit a change by using the tool in openstack-doc-tools, but that change is disagreed by a doc core. Meanwhile I also find that there is rarely change merged for

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-manuals] What the status of DocImpact

Hi ZhiQiang, I am not sure I understand your question. The only change to DocImpact is that now the bug is created in the project's bug queue, not OpenStack manuals. There is no other automation for DocImpact. For the config ref, there is a script that we run to get any new changes. That will

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat]informal meetup during summit

Hi all Let's settle with fallowing schedule:) *Monday 7:00 pm at * * continentalclub * : The most recommanded place for live music bar in Austin! address : 1315 S Congress Ave Austin, TX 78704

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Distributed Database

On 24 April 2016 at 12:15, Edward Leafe wrote: > On Apr 24, 2016, at 6:41 AM, Michael Bayer wrote: > >> I'm only seeking to counter what appears to be the premise of your blog >> post, which is that distributed and SQL are mutually exclusive. When you >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-manuals] What the status of DocImpact

On 4/24/2016 8:03 AM, ZhiQiang Fan wrote: but Document Team has so beautiful tables, and so convenient tools , it is a huge waste of resource if we manually write it to release note in each project. So I want to figure out what have happened to prevent Document Team continuing previous

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Place kolla-mesos in openstack-attic

+1 On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 3:08 am Michał Rostecki wrote: > +1 > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron lib hack has broken all decomposed projects

This was a learning experience and we found out the hard way about an extra dependency we had not anticipated. Thanks Gary for spotting it early and hopefully the revert will merge soon. Doug Wiegley wrote: > That revert is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/309776 ,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Distributed Database

On Apr 24, 2016, at 6:41 AM, Michael Bayer wrote: > I'm only seeking to counter what appears to be the premise of your blog post, > which is that distributed and SQL are mutually exclusive. When you say, > "why don't we just query the database?" You can make distributed

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-manuals] What the status of DocImpact

On 04/24/2016 11:12 AM, ZhiQiang Fan wrote: Hi Lana, Thank you for explaining it! Yes, I noticed that the DocImpact bug track now has shifted to project its own, that why I submit a change by using the tool in openstack-doc-tools, but that change is disagreed by a doc core. Meanwhile I also

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Distributed Database

On Apr 24, 2016, at 3:28 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > Heh, glad you said it! :) -- Ed Leafe __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes] Introducing the Kubernetes OpenStack Special Interest Group

got it thanks :) On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Steve Gordon wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Zhipeng Huang" > > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > > > Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kubernetes] Mirantis participation in kolla-mesos project and shift towards Kubernetes

On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 2:27 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > > Trying to understand the issue here, do you believe the current jinja2 > Dockerfiles are not readable? I'm pretty sure my 11 and 13 year old > children which are just learning programming already understand

Re: [openstack-dev] [all]call for contributors for Tricircle project - for massive distributed edge clouds and large scale cloud.

Hi, Two sessions to learn more about Tricircle: 1. lightning talks about Tricircle use case: modularized capacity expansion in OpenStack based public cloud Monday, April 25 14:50 – 16:20 in the Hilton room Salon E a. https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/9499

[openstack-dev] 答复: [probably forge email可能是仿冒邮件]Re: [kolla] centos-binary-neutron-openvswitch-agent

Hi Jeffrey, Here is the output: [root@forimg tools]# docker logs neutron_openvswitch_agent INFO:__main__:Kolla config strategy set to: COPY_ALWAYS INFO:__main__:Loading config file at /var/lib/kolla/config_files/config.json INFO:__main__:Validating config file INFO:__main__:Copying service

[openstack-dev] 答复: Re: openstack-dev] [vitrage] vitrage alarms list

Hi I'm not sure. The cli can create nova, cinder, glance and etc users, but not vitrage, so strange. So i delete all source repos, and clean the env, then deploy the OS again. It works now. :) But there is a problems in vitrage dashboard. I use vitrage topology show cli can get the topology,but

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Change 247669: Ceph Puppet: implement per-pool parameters:

Thanks, Steve. Cheers, S - Original Message - From: "Steven Hardy" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Cc: ski...@redhat.com Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2016 11:14:58 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kubernetes] Mirantis participation in kolla-mesos project and shift towards Kubernetes

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Tomasz Pa wrote: > Kolla images are simply to big and not properly layered. What it means > that if you today want to upgrade one of the packages: ie: python-nova > (assuming images are build from RPMs) you're upgrading whole layer > which

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kubernetes] Mirantis participation in kolla-mesos project and shift towards Kubernetes

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Michał Rostecki wrote: > > Ummm... no? > > If you want to upgrade the things in containers, you should just > rebuild them. You don't do any "yum update" action by hand in some > middle layer. The newest updated repo metadata come from

Re: [openstack-dev] [Telemetry][Ceilometer][Aodh] Clean crazy old bugs and patches

On Sat, Apr 23 2016, ZhiQiang Fan wrote: > Recently I'm cleaning bugs and reviews of Ceilometer+Aodh, some out dated > bugs, long time (two months) no active reviews, assignments will be > removed. If you are the owner or just interest in it, please provide new > information or follow ups, to let

Re: [openstack-dev] [searchlight] [ceilometer] [fuel] [freezer] [monasca] Elasticsearch 2.x gate support

On Mon, Apr 18 2016, McLellan, Steven wrote: Hi Steven, […] > * Have you tested with ES 2.x at all? > * Do you have plans to move to ES 2.x? I don't think we have tested that nor anyone working actively on ES. Gordon Chung is probably the more knowledgeable on that piece. Though I would not

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kubernetes] Mirantis participation in kolla-mesos project and shift towards Kubernetes

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:51 AM, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > > I do not think this is the issue of Kolla. It is a issue of Docker > images. All the docker images has such issue. This should be solved > in the docker side. > It's a kolla issue and they way project build

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack-dev] [vitrage] vitrage alarms list

Hi, I understand it works now What was the problem ? Eyal On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 4:55 AM, wrote: > > Hi > I get the latest sources and delete the /etc/vitrage/vitrage.conf，do > unstack.sh and stack.sh. > But deploy failed. The local.cnof is the same as before. > Is

[openstack-dev] [vitrage] Vitrage meeting on Apr 27 - SKIPPED

Hi, Vitrage weekly meeting on April 27 will be skipped. We will meet again on the week of May 1. Thanks, Ifat. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kubernetes] Mirantis participation in kolla-mesos project and shift towards Kubernetes

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Tomasz Pa wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 2:27 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) > wrote: >> >> Trying to understand the issue here, do you believe the current jinja2 >> Dockerfiles are not readable? I'm pretty sure my 11 and 13 year

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Distributed Database

On Apr 23, 2016, at 10:08 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > > think it's amusing that Redis was Nova's original "database". :) > > I "fondly" remember having to work with the original Redis store interface > for complex data. Oh the fun that was had. I think my first commits to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Distributed Database

On Apr 23, 2016, at 11:33 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: > > Facebook and LinkedIn have built distributed database systems based on MySQL > at profoundly massive scales. Openstack's problem I'm going to guess isn't as > hard as that. That's always the problem with citing