Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher][keystone] getting AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'epoll'

Hi, I got the same problem in a totally different project, but with the same error. From what I saw, the problem do not come from requests, but from urllib3, which was updated to version 1.20 [1] 2 weeks ago. Using urllib3 version 1.19 resolved my issue. Hope this helps, Christophe [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Amy Marrich for core

+1 from me ☺ From: Alexandra Settle Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Friday, January 27, 2017 at 2:29 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher][keystone] getting AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'epoll'

Hi Pradeep Singh. Seems that there are some issues with requests 2.13.0. Try to install requests==2.12.0 Best wishes, ___ Alexander Chadin, Engineer Software Solutions Department Servionica Ltd. Work email: a.cha...@servionica.ru Mobile:

[openstack-dev] [vitrage] Vitrage Ocata release candidate

Hi, Thursday, February 2nd is the deadline for tagging Vitrage release candidates and creating stable/ocata branches. Please make sure all your important changes are pushed before this date. Starting from next week, only bug fixes can be pushed to stable/ocata. The master branch will be used

[openstack-dev] [MassivelyDistributed] IRC Meeting tomorrow 15:00 UTC

Dear all, A gentle reminder for our meeting tomorrow. As usual, the agenda is available at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/massively_distributed_ircmeetings_2017 (line 136) Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Best, Ad_rien_

[openstack-dev] [neutron-fwaas] issue with firewall and sfc

Hi, I am looking to fwaas_v2, which now allows the firewall rules to get apply on VM ports also. The doc suggests it will work in tandem with neutron SFC. However, in SFC the port-security is disabled and if thats the case, where will the IPTABLE rules will be rendered ? -- Regards, Vikash

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Tacker] Creating feature branch for Tacker

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 07:40:13AM +0530, Digambar Patil wrote: > Hello Infra team, > > I am implementing new API framework in tacker based on Falcon. We have > decided to create separate branch for this so that we can push all the code > to feature branch and once dev is completed, will merge

Re: [openstack-dev] [ffe][requirements][gnocchi][rally][mistral] upper-constraint gnocchiclient 3.0.0

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:31:44PM +, gordon chung wrote: > > > On 31/01/17 04:09 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > > So, to summarize, new server doesn't work with old client. Will this > > require a global requirements update as well (seems like it)? > > i probably shouldve just typed that ^ >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

hi, On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Takashi Yamamoto's message of 2017-01-26 11:42:48 +0900: >> hi, >> >> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 2:17 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> > Excerpts from Dariusz Śmigiel's message of

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

hi, >> That's great to hear Yamamoto. Since you are already a neutron-core I assume >> you are already intimate with the work required to strengthen the VPNaaS >> project. I have added you to [4] and you can lean on me for any changes that >> needs reviewing. i wrote a scenario test.

Re: [openstack-dev] gate jobs - papercuts

On 1/31/2017 11:49 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Folks, Here's the list of job failures that failed in the gate queue. captured with my script[1][2] since around 10:00 AM today. All jobs failed with just one bad test.

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] Please add a initial core member to meteos-ui-core.

All done :-) On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Hiroyuki Eguchi wrote: > Hello Infra Team. > > > > I've created new projects named meteos-ui > > which UI interface for Machine Learning as a Service. > > > > Could you please add me (Hiroyuki Eguchi )

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] CI freeze and transition to quickstart

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Gabriele Cerami wrote: > Hi, > > despite CI freeze for substantial change is in order, I recognize > there's always the need to add or modify slightly the jobs for > important fixes or to improve debugging. > > Unfortunately in these days we

[openstack-dev] [kolla] Domains support

Hi, I'm looking for domains support in Kolla. I've searched, but didn't find anything relevant. Could someone point me how to achieve this? What I'm really looking for, in fact, is a decent way or setting auth through LDAP backend while keeping service users (neutron, for example) in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [FFE][requirements] VMware nsxlib 0.7.0

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 04:40:22PM +, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > At the moment we have a number of bugs in the plugin that are addressed by > the patches here. Could we please get this approved so that the Ocata version > will be ina state that we can release it. This is blocking us for

[openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] Please add a initial core member to meteos-ui-core.

Hello Infra Team. I've created new projects named meteos-ui which UI interface for Machine Learning as a Service. Could you please add me (Hiroyuki Eguchi ) as a initial core member of meteos-ui-core ? Thanks. -- Hiroyuki

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

I think Russian already owns the bear. From: Jim Rollenhagen [mailto:j...@jimrollenhagen.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 2:49 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design Hey

[openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] CI freeze and transition to quickstart

Hi, despite CI freeze for substantial change is in order, I recognize there's always the need to add or modify slightly the jobs for important fixes or to improve debugging. Unfortunately in these days we are wrapping up the gap in feature coverage between tripleo-ci and quickstart, and any of

[openstack-dev] [kolla] Phoenix area meet up with the topic of Kolla Feb 15th @ 21:00 UTC

Hey folks, Toby Cardone has kindly organized a local (to me) community meetup hosted by the Red Hat Software User Group at Insight’s facilities in Tempe, AZ with the topic of Kolla on February 15th, 2017 at 21:00 UTC. Several folks in the Kolla IRC channel have asked if remote participation

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][all][ptl][stable] the process for creating stable/ocata branches

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:27:08PM -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: > * I will branch the requirements repository shortly after all of > the cycle-with-milestone projects have branched. After the > requirements repository is branched and the master requirements > list is opened, projects that

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron-fwaas] issue with firewall and sfc

I will be happy to contribute and will join the meeting. On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Sridar Kandaswamy (skandasw) < skand...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Vikash: > > The support for VM ports is in progress and we should have that completed > fairly early in Pike. We have had some prelim thoughts

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][stable][relmgt] PTG prep

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 04:46:03PM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hi! > > The requirements team, the stable maintenance team and the release > management team will share a single room on the Monday and Tuesday of > the PTG. Since we don't all need 2 full days of coordination (and > several of us

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Dmitry Tantsur and Alex Schultz as instack-undercloud cores

On 31/01/17 18:02, Ben Nemec wrote: > In the spirit of all the core team changes, here are a couple more I'd > like to propose. > > Dmitry has been very helpful reviewing in instack-undercloud for a long > time so this is way overdue. I'm also going to propose that he be able > to +2 anything

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Hi all, this new logo actually reminds me of a wide-spread Russian meme (Warning, might be considered NSFW) http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/preved-medved-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%B4-%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%B4 Not the best connotation to my taste :-/ So yeah, even the previous

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Device tag in the API breaks in the old microversion

The more urgent stuff has indeed merged - many thanks to Matt and other cores for getting this in quickly before rc1. The fixes to tests do indeed need more attention, which I will provide :) On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 1/26/2017 8:32 PM,

[openstack-dev] [puppet] No meeting today - Jan 31, 2017

Hi all, Since the agenda[0] for the meeting is empty, I'm canceling the meeting. If you wish to talk about something next week, please add it to the agenda[1]. Thanks, -Alex [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20170131 [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p

Re: [openstack-dev] [aodh][vitrage] Aodh generic alarms

On 30/01/2017, 19:11, "gordon chung" wrote: > > On 29/01/17 08:52 AM, Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL) wrote: > > > > Vitrage could be enhanced to become an alarm orchestrator. > > The question is – do you want Vitrage to be one? > > And how would you describe the role of an alarm

[openstack-dev] [puppet] [infra] [fuel] Adding puppet-module-build voting job

Hi, I have been working on adding a new CI job that will: - test if "puppet module build ." command works - be executed only when touching metadata.json This job will be useful to validate tarballs can be created when releasing Puppet modules. If your project is failing on

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron-fwaas] issue with firewall and sfc

Hi Vikash: The support for VM ports is in progress and we should have that completed fairly early in Pike. We have had some prelim thoughts on integration with SFC but have not come to that point yet. If u have some interest, u are also welcome to join our weekly meeting [1] and we can discuss

[openstack-dev] [containers][magnum] Swarm Mode template

Hi, Docker 1.13 has been released with several improvements that brings swarm mode principles closer to Kubernetes such as docker-compose service swarm mode. I'd like to implement a v2 swarm template. I don't know if it's already been discussed. Swarm mode is a bit different but a lot simpler to

Re: [openstack-dev] [FFE][requirements] FFE for os-dpm

Thanks a lot! Yes, bumping the GC at some point in time makes sense. I'm not 100% sure about the process. - I would wait until the UC has merged - Then merge the corresponding update on networking-dpm - Then request a bump of the global requirements version Does that make sense? -- -

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Dmitry Tantsur and Alex Schultz as instack-undercloud cores

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: > In the spirit of all the core team changes, here are a couple more I'd like > to propose. > > Dmitry has been very helpful reviewing in instack-undercloud for a long time > so this is way overdue. I'm also going to

Re: [openstack-dev] [FFE][requirements] FFE for os-dpm

On 01/31/2017 09:35 AM, Andreas Scheuring wrote: > Hi, I'm requesting a feature freeze exception for raising the upper > constraint of the os-dpm library. Therefore the following patch got > submitted to gerrit [1]. > > > os-dpm is a shared library between the projects nova-dpm [2] and >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa] gate-grenade-dsvm-neutron-multinode-live-migration-nv is 100% fail since 1/21

On 1/27/2017 9:35 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: The only thing I can think that might be causing some mischief is the devstack-tools stuff that was integrated recently into the CI system, which messes with local.conf. But I don't know enough about how that works, so would need sdague to

[openstack-dev] [FFE][requirements] FFE for os-dpm

Hi, I'm requesting a feature freeze exception for raising the upper constraint of the os-dpm library. Therefore the following patch got submitted to gerrit [1]. os-dpm is a shared library between the projects nova-dpm [2] and networking-dpm [3]. Those projects are still under development (first

Re: [openstack-dev] [aodh][vitrage] Aodh generic alarms

On 31/01/17 08:34 AM, Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL) wrote: > If you query Vitrage (or get a notification from Vitrage) and then you query > Aodh, then Aodh will not return any additional information. But – if you > query only Aodh, you will be aware of the fact that the instances are at > risk.

Re: [openstack-dev] [FFE][requirements] VMware nsxlib 0.7.0

On 01/31/2017 10:40 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > > At the moment we have a number of bugs in the plugin that are addressed > by the patches here. Could we please get this approved so that the Ocata > version will be ina state that we can release it. This is blocking us > for certain uses cases.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa] gate-grenade-dsvm-neutron-multinode-live-migration-nv is 100% fail since 1/21

On 01/27/2017 10:42 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > 2017-01-27 19:35 GMT-08:00 Matt Riedemann : >> On 1/27/2017 5:00 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >>> >>> I noticed that this job is 100% failure since 1/21: >>> >>> http://tinyurl.com/zjh5bc5 >>> >>> >>>

[openstack-dev] [snaps] announce: new snaps for rally, tempest and openstackclients

Hi All Snap packages for rally (0.7.0), tempest (14.0.0) and openstackclients (currently Newton aligned) are available for use; the associated git repositories can also be found under the openstack org on github (see [0], [1], [2]). Git repos also contain details of use of each snap. You can

Re: [openstack-dev] [containers][magnum] Swarm Mode template

Hi. I have done it by checking the ip address of the master. The current state of the heat drivers doesn't allow the distinction between master > 1 or master=1. Spyros On 31 January 2017 at 16:33, Kevin Lefevre wrote: > Hi, Docker 1.13 has been released with several

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Updates from the containers squad: Where are we at?

Greetings, In the last month, there’s been no update on what’s been happening in the containers effort for TripleO so I thought I’d drop an email to… well… provide updates. The work in the DFG has been broken down into more granular steps that are easier to account for. However, I’d like to

[openstack-dev] [FFE][requirements] VMware nsxlib 0.7.0

Hi, At the moment we have a number of bugs in the plugin that are addressed by the patches here. Could we please get this approved so that the Ocata version will be ina state that we can release it. This is blocking us for certain uses cases. Thanks Gary

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Ocata FFE, CIFE, RC1

== Ocata FFE (feature freeze exception) We are now in Feature Freeze, which means we won't add any new feature in TripleO from now until we release final Ocata. Some exceptions might be made though. Here are the requirements: - the feature has to be tracked in a blueprint or bug in Launchpad. -

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Dmitry Tantsur and Alex Schultz as instack-undercloud cores

In the spirit of all the core team changes, here are a couple more I'd like to propose. Dmitry has been very helpful reviewing in instack-undercloud for a long time so this is way overdue. I'm also going to propose that he be able to +2 anything Ironic-related in TripleO since that is his

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Dmitry Tantsur and Alex Schultz as instack-undercloud cores

On 01/31/2017 11:02 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: > In the spirit of all the core team changes, here are a couple more I'd > like to propose. > > Dmitry has been very helpful reviewing in instack-undercloud for a long > time so this is way overdue. I'm also going to propose that he be able > to +2

Re: [openstack-dev] Supporting our global community

Hello, Thanks a lot for this important message. As an I18n team contributor and an non-US citizen, I quite agree with the note. FYI: ujuc - I18n Korean language coordinator translated the message into Korean language =>

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Dmitry Tantsur and Alex Schultz as instack-undercloud cores

+1 On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 6:48 PM, John Trowbridge wrote: > > > On 01/31/2017 11:02 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > In the spirit of all the core team changes, here are a couple more I'd > > like to propose. > > > > Dmitry has been very helpful reviewing in instack-undercloud for a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Dmitry Tantsur and Alex Schultz as instack-undercloud cores

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: > In the spirit of all the core team changes, here are a couple more I'd like > to propose. > > Dmitry has been very helpful reviewing in instack-undercloud for a long time > so this is way overdue. I'm also going to

Re: [openstack-dev] [FFE][requirements] FFE for os-dpm

On 01/31/2017 10:52 AM, Andreas Scheuring wrote: > Thanks a lot! > > Yes, bumping the GC at some point in time makes sense. I'm not 100% sure > about the process. > - I would wait until the UC has merged > - Then merge the corresponding update on networking-dpm > - Then request a bump of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Updates from the containers squad: Where are we at?

Great to hear the containerization process is going well. :) Can we set aside some time during the PTG to talk about the process of detecting stale/building fresh containers at the PTG? Its a problem that all the kolla deliverables would also like solved. So maybe we can work together on it?

[openstack-dev] [vitrage] Added Vitrage release notes

Hi, I added release notes for the Vitrage projects. Please go over them, and let me know if I missed an important feature: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427311/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427130/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427121/ Note that these changes must be merged before

Re: [openstack-dev] [FFE][requirements] VMware nsxlib 0.7.0

On 01/31/2017 12:18 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > At the moment we are the only consuming project. This is blocking us at the > moment. How do you suggest moving this forwards? > Could we remove the upper constraints? > Thanks > Gary > > On 1/31/17, 6:48 PM, "Matthew Thode"

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Feature Freeze Exception request for octavia-services-integration

Hi, I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for patches submitted against the octavia-services-integration blueprint ( https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/octavia-service-integration). The service will not be deployed by default and is not currently part of scenario testing so

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Updates from the containers squad: Where are we at?

On 31/01/17 17:17 +, Fox, Kevin M wrote: Great to hear the containerization process is going well. :) Can we set aside some time during the PTG to talk about the process of detecting stale/building fresh containers at the PTG? Its a problem that all the kolla deliverables would also like

Re: [openstack-dev] gate jobs - papercuts

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Folks, > > Here's the list of job failures that failed in the gate queue. > captured with my script[1][2] since around 10:00 AM today. All jobs > failed with just one bad test. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] gate jobs - papercuts

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:49:13PM -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Folks, > > Here's the list of job failures that failed in the gate queue. > captured with my script[1][2] since around 10:00 AM today. All jobs > failed with just one bad test. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Updates from the containers squad: Where are we at?

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > Greetings, > > In the last month, there’s been no update on what’s been happening in the > containers effort for TripleO so I thought I’d drop an email to… well… > provide > updates. > > The work in the DFG has been

Re: [openstack-dev] [FFE][requirements] VMware nsxlib 0.7.0

Hi, At the moment we are the only consuming project. This is blocking us at the moment. How do you suggest moving this forwards? Could we remove the upper constraints? Thanks Gary On 1/31/17, 6:48 PM, "Matthew Thode" wrote: On 01/31/2017 10:40 AM, Gary Kotton

[openstack-dev] gate jobs - papercuts

Folks, Here's the list of job failures that failed in the gate queue. captured with my script[1][2] since around 10:00 AM today. All jobs failed with just one bad test. http://logs.openstack.org/48/426448/2/gate/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full-ubuntu-xenial/ecb3d0a/ -

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Feature Freeze Exception request for octavia-services-integration

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Brent Eagles wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for patches submitted against > the octavia-services-integration blueprint > (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/octavia-service-integration). > The

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Dmitry Tantsur and Alex Schultz as instack-undercloud cores

On 01/31/2017 11:03 AM, James Slagle wrote: On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: In the spirit of all the core team changes, here are a couple more I'd like to propose. Dmitry has been very helpful reviewing in instack-undercloud for a long time so this

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher][keystone] getting AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'epoll'

Thanks Christophe, I will give it a try. Thanks, Pradeep On Tuesday, January 31, 2017, Christophe Fontaine < christophe.fonta...@qosmos.com> wrote: > Hi, > I got the same problem in a totally different project, but with the same > error. > From what I saw, the problem do not come from requests,

[openstack-dev] [Shaker] Shaker Image Builder fails in Ocata due to OS::Glance::Image deprecation

Hey, Starting Ocata, looks like only glance v2 is enabled by default. This breaks the shaker image builder template since we make use of the resource type OS::Glance::Image and creating images from url links is not supported in v2. How do we want deal with this? Maybe have the user pass in the

[openstack-dev] [elastic-recheck] Miscellaneous questions of potential Neutron interest

Hi all, we were looking at expanding usage of elastic-recheck in Neutron, and several questions popped up that we would like to ask. 1. Are all jobs eligible for coverage with queries? The reason we ask is that there was some disagreement on whether all job runs are eligible, or e.g. gate queue

Re: [openstack-dev] [elastic-recheck] Miscellaneous questions of potential Neutron interest

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:38:58AM -0800, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hi all, > > we were looking at expanding usage of elastic-recheck in Neutron, and > several questions popped up that we would like to ask. > > 1. Are all jobs eligible for coverage with queries? The reason we ask > is that there

Re: [openstack-dev] [containers][magnum] Swarm Mode template

On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 17:01 +0100, Spyros Trigazis wrote: > Hi. > > I have done it by checking the ip address of the master. The current > state of > the heat drivers doesn't allow the distinction between master > 1 or > master=1. > Please, could you elaborate on this ? Also what is your

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Dmitry Tantsur and Alex Schultz as instack-undercloud cores

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > In the spirit of all the core team changes, here are a couple more I'd > like to propose. > > Dmitry has been very helpful reviewing in instack-undercloud for a long > time so this is way overdue. I'm also going to

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron CI team meeting

Hi folks, Recently [1], a new meeting has been setup to give the neutron team a dedicated time to discuss any upstream CI matter (gate issues, testing strategies, etc), as well as an overflow space to be used after the main team meeting section [3]. Kudos to Ihar for being our first chair.

[openstack-dev] Make sure you have placement-api running in dsvm jobs on master

This is a quick heads up that once this nova change merges: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/425806/ The n-cpu service will fail to start in dsvm jobs unless the placement-api service is also enabled, which it is by default in devstack:

Re: [openstack-dev] gate jobs - papercuts

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 01:19:41PM -0500, Steve Martinelli wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Davanum Srinivas > wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > Here's the list of job failures that failed in the gate queue. > > captured with my script[1][2] since around 10:00 AM today.

Re: [openstack-dev] [containers][magnum] Swarm Mode template

Hi, The hack-ish way is to check if the current master has a different ip than the swarm_api_api and based on that decide whether to swarm init or join. The proper way is to have two resource groups (as you said) one for the primary master and one for the secondary masters. This requires some

[openstack-dev] [ffe][requirements][gnocchi] upper-constraint gnocchiclient 3.0.0

hi, we'd like to request this patch be accepted: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/426917/ the new client removes some encoding done that was previously required by gnocchiv3 and ceilometer newton but is not relevant to either ceilometer ocata or gnocchi v3.1 (which we are trying to release).

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Hey. Just missing the drumsticks. \m/ ʕ•͡ᴥ•ʔ \m/ Regards. --- Rafael Xavier Federal University of Campina Grande Distributed Systems Lab From: "Jim Rollenhagen" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] gate jobs - papercuts

On 1/31/2017 11:49 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Folks, Here's the list of job failures that failed in the gate queue. captured with my script[1][2] since around 10:00 AM today. All jobs failed with just one bad test.

Re: [openstack-dev] gate jobs - papercuts

Thanks MattT, MattR and Steve. Since that last update 4 runs failed http://logs.openstack.org/20/396620/2/gate/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full-ubuntu-xenial/e82ace8/ * tempest.api.compute.admin.test_migrations.MigrationsAdminTest - test_resize_server_revert_deleted_flavor *

[openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Hey ironic-ers, The foundation has passed along a new version of our mascot (attached) to us, and would like your feedback on it. They're hoping to have all mascot-related things ready in time for the PTG, so please do send your thoughts quickly, if you have them. :) // jim

Re: [openstack-dev] [ffe][requirements][gnocchi] upper-constraint gnocchiclient 3.0.0

On 01/31/2017 02:54 PM, gordon chung wrote: > hi, > > we'd like to request this patch be accepted: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/426917/ > > the new client removes some encoding done that was previously required > by gnocchiv3 and ceilometer newton but is not relevant to either >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ffe][requirements][gnocchi] upper-constraint gnocchiclient 3.0.0

On 31/01/17 04:09 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > So, to summarize, new server doesn't work with old client. Will this > require a global requirements update as well (seems like it)? i probably shouldve just typed that ^ > > It will cause a knock-ons for ceilometer, cloudkitty, gnocchi and >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron CI team meeting

Howdy, First of all, thanks for the creation of this space to discuss about shouldn’t be something common(in an utopia) but it’s part of our daily duties. I’m not sure if this is the right venue but I discovered today that the current implementation of the job for coverage[1] only valides the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron CI team meeting

On 31 January 2017 at 14:47, Morales, Victor wrote: > Howdy, > > First of all, thanks for the creation of this space to discuss about > shouldn’t be something common(in an utopia) but it’s part of our daily > duties. I’m not sure if this is the right venue but I

Re: [openstack-dev] gate jobs - papercuts

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 01:19:41PM -0500, Steve Martinelli wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Davanum Srinivas > > wrote: > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > Here's the list of job failures

Re: [openstack-dev] gate jobs - papercuts

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Matthew Treinish > wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 01:19:41PM -0500, Steve Martinelli wrote: >> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Davanum

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

I may be biased to some extent but I don't like it. The mascot doesn't seem to have any personality. It also looks odd because he has this straight face while he's doing the sign of horns, it just doesn't work. I remember when I first saw a logo related to Ironic in that presentation that Jay

Re: [openstack-dev] [tacker] Core team changes / proposing Dharmendra Kushwaha

Thanks for those who responded. Dharmendra - welcome to the tacker-core team! - Sridhar On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Sridhar Ramaswamy wrote: > Tackers, > > I'd like to propose following changes to the Tacker core team. > > Stephen Wong > > After being associated with

[openstack-dev] [tacker] Cancelling today's weekly meeting

I'm cancelling today's meeting. We have a light agenda and our contributors from China are off due to holiday week there. Please use the extra time to continue to wrap up remaining Ocata items, - VNFC support - VNF inline templates - Pending NSD work (api-ref, samples, etc) - other pending items

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Tacker] Creating feature branch for Tacker

Adding openstack-infra ... On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Digambar Patil wrote: > Hello Infra team, > > I am implementing new API framework in tacker based on Falcon. We have > decided to create separate branch for this so that we can push all the code > to feature