Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.db] MySQL Cluster support

2017-02-03 Thread Octave J. Orgeron
Hi Doug, Comments below.. On 2/3/2017 8:21 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2017-02-03 09:41:11 -0500: On 02/02/2017 05:28 PM, Octave J. Orgeron wrote: That refers to the total length of the row. InnoDB has a limit of 65k and NDB is limited to 14k. A simple

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE for novajoin in TripleO's undercloud

2017-02-03 Thread Ben Nemec
On 02/03/2017 10:21 AM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Ben Nemec > wrote: On 02/02/2017 06:27 PM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: Hello, I would like to request an FFE to properly support

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-wg/news

2017-02-03 Thread Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2017-02-03 9:56 GMT-08:00 Chris Dent : > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >>> >>> In today's meeting [0] after briefly covering old business we spent >>> nearly >>> 50 minutes going round in circles discussing the complex interactions of >>> expectations of API

[openstack-dev] [nova] nova 15.0.0.0rc1 (ocata)

2017-02-03 Thread no-reply
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for nova for the end of the Ocata cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/nova/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this candidate will be formally

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Propose Marc Gariepy as core reviewer

2017-02-03 Thread Steve Lewis
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Jesse Pretorius < jesse.pretor...@rackspace.co.uk> wrote: > I’d like to propose Marc Gariepy [1] as a core reviewer for > OpenStack-Ansible. > +1. -- SteveL __ OpenStack Development Mailing

[openstack-dev] [nova] Config option cleanup burndown

2017-02-03 Thread Matt Riedemann
This is sort of a direct question to Markus, but how accurate is this burndown chart now? http://45.55.105.55:8082/config-options.html I think there is still work for this in Pike, but would like to get an idea of how much of the work is left from those more involved (maybe johnthetubaguy or

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

2017-02-03 Thread Clint Byrum
I'm only barely an Ironic contributor these days, but what about having the bear do David Lee Roth's famous jump? http://www.vhnd.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/kick_fb.jpg Doesn't require props, and no hand gestures. Alternatively, you could have the bear playing air guitar... if that can be

[openstack-dev] [nova] placement/resource providers update 10

2017-02-03 Thread Chris Dent
It's been a busy week and it is getting into my Friday evening, so I'm not sure I can adequately summarize where things are in the universe of resource providers and the placement API, so instead I'm going to give a bit of summary of what we managed get into Ocata. The effective summary is that

[openstack-dev] [nova] Moving long-running efforts to Pike

2017-02-03 Thread Matt Riedemann
We have a few multi-release efforts going on in Nova and we've had release-specific blueprints to track those. Since Ocata is closed for those now, I've started created blueprints for Pike so people can target their remaining (and new) changes at the Pike blueprint. Those would be:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Config option cleanup burndown

2017-02-03 Thread Singh, Sarafraj
Matt, This chart is quite accurate. We are almost finished with this work. We have ~10 outstanding patches that did not land in Ocata. There are few more TODO’s left in the code to clean up and that should be it. -Raj On 2/3/17, 2:08 PM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Config option cleanup burndown

2017-02-03 Thread Szankin, Maciej
On 2/3/17 2:26 PM, Singh, Sarafraj wrote: > Matt, > This chart is quite accurate. We are almost finished with this work. We have > ~10 outstanding patches that did not land in Ocata. There are few more TODO’s > left in the code to clean up and that should be it. > > -Raj > > On 2/3/17, 2:08 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

2017-02-03 Thread Rochelle Grober
Well, uh, how about Jazz hands? Open, waving hands are pretty universally friendly and it would look more like a dancing bear which brings the music aspect bac a bit. Sorry for butting in, but I couldn resist... --Rocky -Original Message- From: Miles Gould [mailto:mgo...@redhat.com]

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.db] MySQL Cluster support

2017-02-03 Thread Octave J. Orgeron
Comments below.. On 2/3/2017 8:34 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: On 02/03/2017 10:21 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2017-02-03 09:41:11 -0500: On 02/02/2017 05:28 PM, Octave J. Orgeron wrote: That refers to the total length of the row. InnoDB has a limit of 65k and

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.db] MySQL Cluster support

2017-02-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Octave J. Orgeron's message of 2017-02-03 09:54:53 -0700: > Comments below.. > > On 2/2/2017 6:22 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > >> Yes, this is major undertaking and major driver for Oracle to setup a > >> 3rd party CI so that we can automate regression testing against MySQL > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [ux] Future of the OpenStack UX team

2017-02-03 Thread Thierry Carrez
Shamail wrote: > Hi Thierry, > >> On Jan 31, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> >> Shamail wrote: Sorry for not noticing this thread and replying earlier. I've now reviewed the minutes from the meeting, and I support thingee's suggestion of

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.db] MySQL Cluster support

2017-02-03 Thread Octave J. Orgeron
Comments below.. On 2/2/2017 6:22 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Yes, this is major undertaking and major driver for Oracle to setup a 3rd party CI so that we can automate regression testing against MySQL Cluster. On the flip side, it helps solve some of the challenges with I'm not sure we would

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.db] MySQL Cluster support

2017-02-03 Thread Octave J. Orgeron
Hi Mike, It might be easier to reduce the size of certain columns today. We have an enormous amount of wasted space in the tables today. Reducing them would make things more efficient regardless of the database engine being used. On the flip side, if we were using SQL Alchemy properly and not

Re: [openstack-dev] Large Contributing OpenStack Operators working group?

2017-02-03 Thread Dean Troyer
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Sean M. Collins wrote: > I suppose I am also philosophically opposed to having all these special > snowflake working groups. If you want to get things done in OpenStack > the best thing to do is roll up your sleeves and start participating >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.db] MySQL Cluster support

2017-02-03 Thread Octave J. Orgeron
Hi Mike, Comments below.. Thanks, Octave On 2/3/2017 7:41 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: On 02/02/2017 05:28 PM, Octave J. Orgeron wrote: That refers to the total length of the row. InnoDB has a limit of 65k and NDB is limited to 14k. A simple example would be the volumes table in Cinder where the

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [gate] [all] openstack services footprint lead to oom-kill in the gate

2017-02-03 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-02-03 11:12:04 +0100 (+0100), Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: [...] > So, would it be realistic to bump the flavors RAM to favor our stability in > the short term? (considering that the less amount of workload our clouds > will be able to take is fewer, but the failure rate will also be

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI Squad Meeting Summary (week 5 - for real now)

2017-02-03 Thread Attila Darazs
As always, if these topics interest you and you want to contribute to the discussion, feel free to join the next meeting: Time: Thursdays, 15:30-16:30 UTC Place: https://bluejeans.com/4113567798/ Note: last two weeks I used the incorrect week number. Getting back on track, this is the 5th

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-wg/news

2017-02-03 Thread Chris Dent
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: 2017-02-02 9:38 GMT-08:00 Chris Dent : Greetings OpenStack community, In today's meeting [0] after briefly covering old business we spent nearly 50 minutes going round in circles discussing the complex interactions of

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

2017-02-03 Thread Miles Gould
On 01/02/17 01:28, arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote: I think Russian already owns the bear. AIUI, trademark law allows for use of the same mark by different entities provided they operate in different enough spheres to prevent confusion. Hence the long-running litigation between Apple Music

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher] Watcher release v1.0.0

2017-02-03 Thread Pradeep Singh
Congratulations, +1 :) On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Feb 3, 2017, at 4:27 AM, Antoine Cabot > wrote: > > > I'm very proud to announce today the availability of Watcher in version > 1.0.0. > > Congratulations! > > > -- Ed

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

2017-02-03 Thread Miles Gould
On 02/02/17 16:55, Loo, Ruby wrote: I guess a 'peace sign' wouldn't work? That also has several meanings: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_sign On the other hand, the palm-forward version has no offensive meanings that I can see (the offensive version is palm-backwards). I like the

[openstack-dev] [searchlight] searchlight-ui 2.0.0.0rc1 (ocata)

2017-02-03 Thread no-reply
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for searchlight-ui for the end of the Ocata cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/searchlight-ui/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this candidate

[openstack-dev] [nova] Ocata blueprint burndown chart

2017-02-03 Thread Matt Riedemann
For those that like charts, I was keeping track of our progress with approving and then completing blueprints targeted to Ocata over the release. It's pretty unscientific. I basically had a spreadsheet with a cell per day and I'd just plug in numbers from launchpad based on the total number of

[openstack-dev] [neutron] neutron-dynamic-routing 10.0.0.0rc1 (ocata)

2017-02-03 Thread no-reply
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for neutron-dynamic-routing for the end of the Ocata cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/neutron-dynamic-routing/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate

[openstack-dev] [neutron] networking-ovn 2.0.0.0rc1 (ocata)

2017-02-03 Thread no-reply
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for networking-ovn for the end of the Ocata cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/networking-ovn/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this candidate

Re: [openstack-dev] [ux] Future of the OpenStack UX team

2017-02-03 Thread Shamail
> On Feb 3, 2017, at 2:16 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Shamail wrote: >> Hi Thierry, >> >>> On Jan 31, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >>> >>> Shamail wrote: > Sorry for not noticing this thread and replying earlier. > >

[openstack-dev] [neutron] neutron 10.0.0.0rc1 (ocata)

2017-02-03 Thread no-reply
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for neutron for the end of the Ocata cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/neutron/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this candidate will be

[openstack-dev] [neutron] neutron-fwaas 10.0.0.0rc1 (ocata)

2017-02-03 Thread no-reply
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for neutron-fwaas for the end of the Ocata cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/neutron-fwaas/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this candidate

[openstack-dev] [barbican] barbican 4.0.0.0rc1 (ocata)

2017-02-03 Thread no-reply
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for barbican for the end of the Ocata cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/barbican/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this candidate will be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Shaker] Shaker Image Builder fails in Ocata due to OS::Glance::Image deprecation

2017-02-03 Thread Ilya Shakhat
> > Starting Ocata, looks like only glance v2 is enabled by default. This > breaks the shaker image builder template since we make use of the resource > type OS::Glance::Image and creating images from url links is not > supported in v2. How do we want deal with this? Maybe have the user pass in >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE request for composable upgrades

2017-02-03 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Feb 3, 2017 5:26 AM, "Steven Hardy" wrote: Hi all, There's been some discussion on IRC about this, but I wanted to formally request a FFE for the remaining composable upgrades work and provide a status update: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/overcloud-

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] FFE for tripleo collectd integration

2017-02-03 Thread Lars Kellogg-Stedman
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 01:37:20PM -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Could you patch your THT patch to Depends-On the tripleo-ci patch, so > we can see if the package gets installed and if there is no blocker we > might have missed. I've added the Depends-On to the review. Will that be sufficient

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer][postgresql][gate][telemetry] PostgreSQL gate failure (again)

2017-02-03 Thread Matthew Booth
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 02/02/2017 10:33 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: > > > > > > On 02/01/2017 10:22 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > >> > >> I personally continue to be of the opinion that without an explicit > >> vocal and well-staffed champion, supporting

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Deployment plan management efforts sync up

2017-02-03 Thread Dougal Matthews
On 2 February 2017 at 11:56, Jiri Tomasek wrote: > Hello all, > > there has been several ongoing efforts in TripleO regarding Deployment > Plans management and Deployment configuration itself. A lot of this work is > done to satisfy certain individual requirements but I

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE request for composable upgrades

2017-02-03 Thread Steven Hardy
Hi all, There's been some discussion on IRC about this, but I wanted to formally request a FFE for the remaining composable upgrades work and provide a status update: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/overcloud-upgrades-per-service We've made pretty good progress on this, and the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Using DEFAULT section to configure drivers is not supported since Ocata

2017-02-03 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On 02/02, Gyorgy Szombathelyi wrote: > Hi! > > Because of the deprecated driver configuration in the DEFAULT section doesn't > work anymore in Ocata, I would like to ask if any migration tool exists for > using the previously created volumes? > > E.g. if the existing volumes have the attribute

[openstack-dev] [watcher] Watcher release v1.0.0

2017-02-03 Thread Antoine Cabot
I'm very proud to announce today the availability of Watcher in version 1.0.0. It has been a long way since the initial proposition in Vancouver almost 2 years ago. The project has received a lot of good feedback already thanks to the amazing group of developers working on it. I would like to take

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [gate] [all] openstack services footprint lead to oom-kill in the gate

2017-02-03 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 7:55 AM, IWAMOTO Toshihiro wrote: > At Wed, 1 Feb 2017 16:24:54 -0800, > Armando M. wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > [TL;DR]: OpenStack services have steadily increased their memory > > footprints. We need a concerted way to address the oom-kills

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] BlockDeviceDriver deprecated?

2017-02-03 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On 03/02, Pieter Baele wrote: > Red Hat tells me the Cinder BlockDeviceDriver is going to be deprecated > upstream. It isn't supported in RHOSP in any case. > Is this true? Yes, that is correct, it's in the release notes:

[openstack-dev] [glance] glance 14.0.0.0rc1 (ocata)

2017-02-03 Thread no-reply
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for glance for the end of the Ocata cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/glance/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this candidate will be formally

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Final mascot

2017-02-03 Thread John Garbutt
On 3 February 2017 at 02:59, Matt Riedemann wrote: > The Foundation wants to have the mascots finalized before the PTG. This is > just an opportunity for people to raise issues with it if they have any. Honestly it looks a bit aggressive / sharp / pointy. Maybe less spikes

[openstack-dev] [watcher] Boston CFP

2017-02-03 Thread Antoine Cabot
Hi Watcher team, A quick reminder about CFP for Boston that ends on Sunday. Please look at talks proposals [1] and submit them before the deadline (11:59PM PST on February 6, 2017). I have added a submitter and a target category for each proposal. Thank you, Antoine [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Final mascot

2017-02-03 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Reminded me of the indian traditional colored patterns :) https://www.google.com/search?q=rangoli+star=lnms=isch https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch=1=rangoli -- Dims On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:03 AM, John Garbutt wrote: > On 3 February 2017 at 02:59, Matt Riedemann

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE for novajoin in TripleO's undercloud

2017-02-03 Thread Ben Nemec
On 02/02/2017 06:27 PM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: Hello, I would like to request an FFE to properly support the novajoin vendordata plugin in TripleO. Most of the work has landed, however, we still need to add it to TripleO's CI in order to have it officially supported. This is crucial for

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.db] MySQL Cluster support

2017-02-03 Thread Mike Bayer
On 02/03/2017 10:21 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2017-02-03 09:41:11 -0500: On 02/02/2017 05:28 PM, Octave J. Orgeron wrote: That refers to the total length of the row. InnoDB has a limit of 65k and NDB is limited to 14k. A simple example would be the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE for novajoin in TripleO's undercloud

2017-02-03 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to request an FFE to properly support the novajoin vendordata > plugin in TripleO. Most of the work has landed, however, we still need to > add it to TripleO's CI in order to have it

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Using DEFAULT section to configure drivers is not supported since Ocata

2017-02-03 Thread Gyorgy Szombathelyi
Hello! > > > __ > > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: > > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > >

[openstack-dev] [release] skipping meeting today

2017-02-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
With several members of the team unavailable today, and the release candidates still slowly trickling in, I think it makes more sense for us to catch up with each other Monday than to have our regular meeting today. I'll look for folks in #openstack-release around 14:00 UTC Monday. Doug

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Propose Marc Gariepy as core reviewer

2017-02-03 Thread Truman, Travis
+1 for Marc joining the core reviewer team. His work on CentOS support has been impressive. Travis Truman From: Jesse Pretorius > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.db] MySQL Cluster support

2017-02-03 Thread Roman Podoliaka
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: > Not sure if people on the list are seeing that we are simultaneously talking > about getting rid of Postgresql in the efforts to support only "one > database", while at the same time adding one that is in many ways a new >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.db] MySQL Cluster support

2017-02-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2017-02-03 09:41:11 -0500: > > On 02/02/2017 05:28 PM, Octave J. Orgeron wrote: > > That refers to the total length of the row. InnoDB has a limit of 65k > > and NDB is limited to 14k. > > > > A simple example would be the volumes table in Cinder where the

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Propose Marc Gariepy as core reviewer

2017-02-03 Thread Andy McCrae
Definite +1 from me. Thanks for all the work on CentOS Marc, looking forward to improving upon that with your help! On 3 February 2017 at 13:33, Jesse Pretorius < jesse.pretor...@rackspace.co.uk> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > > I’d like to propose Marc Gariepy [1] as a core reviewer for >

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Propose Marc Gariepy as core reviewer

2017-02-03 Thread Alexandra Settle
+1 from me ☺ Thanks for all your hard work, Marc! From: Jesse Pretorius Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Friday, February 3, 2017 at 1:33 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Propose Marc Gariepy as core reviewer

2017-02-03 Thread Jean-Philippe Evrard
Hello, Great! +1 Best regards, JP From: Jesse Pretorius Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Friday, 3 February 2017 at 13:33 To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] Large Contributing OpenStack Operators working group?

2017-02-03 Thread Sean M. Collins
Jay Pipes wrote: > 4) I see a lot of agenda items around projects like Gluon, Craton, Watcher, > and Blazar. I don't see any concrete ideas about talking with the developers > of the key infrastructure services that OpenStack is built around. How does > the LCOO plan on reaching out to the

[openstack-dev] [octavia] neutron-lbaas 10.0.0.0rc1 (ocata)

2017-02-03 Thread no-reply
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for neutron-lbaas for the end of the Ocata cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/neutron-lbaas/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this candidate

[openstack-dev] [zaqar] zaqar-ui 2.0.0.0rc1 (ocata)

2017-02-03 Thread no-reply
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for zaqar-ui for the end of the Ocata cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/zaqar-ui/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this candidate will be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] FFE for tripleo collectd integration

2017-02-03 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 01:37:20PM -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> Could you patch your THT patch to Depends-On the tripleo-ci patch, so >> we can see if the package gets installed and if there is no blocker we >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Final mascot

2017-02-03 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 2/3/2017 5:03 AM, John Garbutt wrote: On 3 February 2017 at 02:59, Matt Riedemann wrote: The Foundation wants to have the mascots finalized before the PTG. This is just an opportunity for people to raise issues with it if they have any. Honestly it looks a bit

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Propose Marc Gariepy as core reviewer

2017-02-03 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Hi everyone, I’d like to propose Marc Gariepy [1] as a core reviewer for OpenStack-Ansible. His tireless effort to get CentOS as a supported platform in the last two cycles is getting very close to completion, and I feel that it’s important that he’s able to safeguard this work and help grow

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Propose Marc Gariepy as core reviewer

2017-02-03 Thread Logan V.
+1 awesome work on the CentOS support! And lots of helpful reviews on things not CentOS too. Thanks Marc Logan On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote: > Hello, > > > > Great! > > +1 > > > > Best regards, > > JP > > > > From: Jesse

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.db] MySQL Cluster support

2017-02-03 Thread Mike Bayer
On 02/02/2017 05:28 PM, Octave J. Orgeron wrote: That refers to the total length of the row. InnoDB has a limit of 65k and NDB is limited to 14k. A simple example would be the volumes table in Cinder where the row length goes beyond 14k. So in the IF logic block, I change columns types that

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE for novajoin in TripleO's undercloud

2017-02-03 Thread Juan Antonio Osorio
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Juan Antonio Osorio > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I would like to request an FFE to properly support the novajoin > vendordata > > plugin in TripleO. Most of the work

[openstack-dev] [horizon] [neutron] Horizon support for Neutron Trunks - PTL approval needed

2017-02-03 Thread Bence Romsics
Hi All, I'd like to add support for Neutron Trunks [1][2] into Horizon together with a few colleagues in the Pike cycle. We thought of writing a new Horizon plugin [3] for that purpose. That way I hope to keep it optional for deployment and minimize the maintenance cost for the Horizon core team.

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the coming week (02/03-02/09)

2017-02-03 Thread Brian Rosmaita
Congratulations to the Glance team for delivering Ocata RC-1! As discussed at yesterday's Glance meeting, here are the weekly priorities: 1. RC-1 Testing Glance Ocata RC-1 (14.0.0.0rc1) is available and the stable/ocata branch has been created. Please test and create bugs for any anomalies

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Propose Marc Gariepy as core reviewer

2017-02-03 Thread Major Hayden
+1 Anyone who gets into the SELinux trenches with me that many times is worth having as a core. ;) -- Major Hayden On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Jesse Pretorius wrote: > I’d like to propose Marc Gariepy [1] as a core reviewer for > OpenStack-Ansible. His

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Final mascot

2017-02-03 Thread Szankin, Maciej
On 2/3/17 7:56 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 2/3/2017 5:03 AM, John Garbutt wrote: >> On 3 February 2017 at 02:59, Matt Riedemann wrote: >>> The Foundation wants to have the mascots finalized before the PTG. This is >>> just an opportunity for people to raise issues with it

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE for novajoin in TripleO's undercloud

2017-02-03 Thread Juan Antonio Osorio
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 02/02/2017 06:27 PM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I would like to request an FFE to properly support the novajoin >> vendordata plugin in TripleO. Most of the work has landed, however, we >> still

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher] Watcher release v1.0.0

2017-02-03 Thread Ed Leafe
On Feb 3, 2017, at 4:27 AM, Antoine Cabot wrote: > I'm very proud to announce today the availability of Watcher in version 1.0.0. Congratulations! -- Ed Leafe __ OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Propose Marc Gariepy as core reviewer

2017-02-03 Thread Amy Marrich
+1 from me too! Amy IRC: spotz On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Jesse Pretorius < jesse.pretor...@rackspace.co.uk> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > > I’d like to propose Marc Gariepy [1] as a core reviewer for > OpenStack-Ansible. His tireless effort to get CentOS as a supported > platform in the