https://github.com/stackforge/wsme/blob/0.6.2/setup.py (also in master)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/wsme/types.py, line 15, in
module
import ipaddr as ipaddress
https://github.com/stackforge/wsme/blob/master/wsme/types.py#L12-L15
--
-- Matthew Thode
On 11/21/2014 10:42 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-11-20 21:12:33 -0600 (-0600), Matthew Thode wrote:
https://github.com/stackforge/wsme/blob/0.6.2/setup.py (also in master)
[...]
Your message is terse so I'm not sure whether you're asking a
question, but:
if sys.version_info[:2
(not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Matthew Thode
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
generate a
known-good capped list, (e.g. transforming 1.2.3 to ~=1.2 for semver
projects). We could in principle add that to our tarball releases of
projects, even though we can't sensibly put it in git.
tl;dr - I dunno :)
-Rob
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Matthew Thode
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ebuilds like B proposes.
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
me know if you have questions,
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
On 06/03/2015 06:47 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 06/02/2015 10:40 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
On 06/02/2015 05:41 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
Hi,
This came up at the TC meeting today, and I volunteered to provide an
update from the discussion.
In general, I think there is a lot of support
package.
--
Matthew Thode
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
this in this order. Can we get (=)* first, != next, and
(=)* last so that it reads as a human range?
-Sean
that would be awesome if changed like that.
--
Matthew Thode
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Gentoo packages from source client side, don't think this effects us.
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
)?
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
made. From our perspective
(Gentoo) the point releases are nice if only because they require more
focus and testing to be done to be sure they are valid.
That said, I do try to tell our users to use the git based ebuilds (they
point to the stable branches) if at all possible.
--
-- Matthew
)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
for release notes just do git log between commit hashes?
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
check the
extracted files and they should be the same.
I would like to see signed commits in the 'official' repos (at
git.openstack.org), if only because relying on sha alone doesn't seem
enough for some.
--
Matthew Thode
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
(not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
oslotest deps on os-client-config (runtime)
os-client-config deps on oslotest (test)
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire
- Don't strip out files in the repo when publishing to pip
- Publish an example init-script (systemd)
- I think this might be going away with wsgi
Docs:
- nginx wsgi examples
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
/openstack-dev
Some of the issue was that DVR wasn't (not sure if it still isn't)
tested in a multi-node setup.
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development
On 08/19/2015 07:22 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
Questions in-line, but I'd appreciate a better summary
On 8/19/15, 17:50, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'll start by giving this out, but I'll also summarize the asks we had
from upstream.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PAO
/listinfo/openstack-dev
Packaging for us is fairly easy, but it is annoying to have to add 5-6
deps each release, (which means we are adding cruft over time).
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
On 08/21/2015 05:59 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 22 August 2015 at 10:57, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Packaging for us is fairly easy, but it is annoying to have to add 5-6
deps each release, (which means we are adding cruft over time).
We're adding functionality
On 08/20/2015 09:22 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
On 8/19/15, 19:31, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/19/2015 07:22 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
Questions in-line, but I'd appreciate a better summary
On 8/19/15, 17:50, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'll start
.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
As a packager I love this :D
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description
gt; Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
I think doing a self signed CA can work fine, especially if the private
details are kept on the deployment host. The specific scenario I
envision is that y
Didn't see a message on the announce list for that.
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
t; -Sean
>
python wheel repo could help maybe?
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscrib
).
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
og
> those updates
>
> thanks,
> Dims
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
>> Are these constraints locked in place for the entire release cycle? It
>> doesn't look like the stable/liberty version has been up
On 10/15/2015 05:29 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 16 October 2015 at 11:21, Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On 10/15/2015 05:12 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
>>> On 16 October 2015 at 08:10, Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org>
>>> wro
On 10/15/2015 05:12 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 16 October 2015 at 08:10, Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On 10/15/2015 02:04 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> ...
>>>> Where are my caps?
>>>
>>> The known good versions of dependenc
On 10/15/2015 02:17 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>
>
> On 10/15/2015 2:10 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
>> On 10/15/2015 02:04 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
>>> On 16 October 2015 at 08:01, Matthew Thode
>>> <prometheanf...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>>> So, t
ns.
>
> I thought it was
> http://mitakadesignsummit.sched.org/event/0a2307779b4ab81892ba24de379e9dcc#.ViAMfd94u00
> that it was slated for, where its squarely on topic :)
>
> -Rob
>
I'd be nice if we can get this sorted, personally I can't make it to
Friday aftern
ackage for liberty, I can see this
going very bad very quick.
Where are my caps?
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.opensta
On 10/15/2015 02:04 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 16 October 2015 at 08:01, Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> So, this is my perspective in packing liberty for Gentoo.
>>
>> We can have multiple versions of a package available to install, because
>&
nterested in figuring
> out a sustainable way forward, that would be great: please don't feel
> cut out, I'm just not expecting anything.
>
> If there are other approaches, great - please throw them up here.
>
> -Rob
>
At least for my packaging for Gentoo I haven
.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
> Looks like the 2015.1.2 tag is up and now we need to bump the version to
> 2015.1.3 in setup.cfg for the projects, I don't see a series up for that
> yet but it's blocking anything from passing tests on stable/kilo now.
>
I'v
s might be useful in openstack-ansible if we are going to want to use
openstack-ansible for testing. Might want infra's feedback on that
though, also a spec would be in order (to openstack-ansible) for this.
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
_
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
Sane defaults can't be used? The two bugs you listed look f
On 09/10/2015 11:33 AM, Major Hayden wrote:
> On 09/10/2015 11:22 AM, Matthew Thode wrote:
>> Sane defaults can't be used? The two bugs you listed look fine to me as
>> default things to do.
>
> Thanks, Matthew. I tend to agree.
>
> I'm wondering if it would be
On 09/14/2015 03:28 AM, Jesse Pretorius wrote:
> On 10 September 2015 at 19:21, Clint Byrum <cl...@fewbar.com
> <mailto:cl...@fewbar.com>> wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Major Hayden's message of 2015-09-10 09:33:27 -0700:
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
>
ribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
I think this is something we'd be interested in. A BP would be appreciated.
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
__
OpenStack Development Mailin
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
Thanks for the updated list. I'll get to packaging these now so I'll
hopefully have less work when liberty is tagged.
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
I would like this to be the option we go with. I've wanted to add
another OS to OSA but need to fulfil other prerequisites (adding the OS
to disk-image-bui
/lists.openwall.net/netdev/2015/02/18/2
I also package openstack for gentoo, which triggers things all over in
that side.
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
U
l free to add your ++'s) I'd like to use this as a final
> call out in case any objections are wanting to be made. If none have
> been made by next Wednesday (6/8) I'll go ahead and add her to dib-core.
>
> Cheers,
> Greg
>
I'm good with it, not a core, but +1 from me.
--
P
While we (gentoo) are able to build the docs in our git branch based
ebuilds (sys-cluster/nova-2015.2. for liberty for example) we can't
do so in our tag based ebuilds don't think tarballs.openstack.org does
(or should) ship the .git folder. For us, building docs at install (or
binpkg) generation time is the
While we have had 2016.1. packages (ebuilds that track the
stable/mitaka branches) and it has already seen deployment I'm now happy
to announce that now that the tarballs are up we also have ebuilds based
on the tags/tarballs.
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description
On 04/08/2016 03:16 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 04/08/2016 07:47 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
>> On 04/08/2016 11:47 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> Another thing is that the Debian packages are the only ones available
>>> for many services, as Canonical doesn't w
where it can be installed.
Saying that it's the only OS where some packages can be installed is not
nice to the other packagers /s
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
- probably - neutron/server/wsgi_pecan.py
nova - probably - both in nova/wsgi/
heat - probably - three under heat/httpd/
Don't think docs are out yet (which would likely have some of this
info), but any info you have around this would help.
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
On 03/25/2016 09:54 AM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> I'm updating the packaging for openstack in preparation for the release
> and need some info to update correctly. I'm specifically looking at the
> following services.
>
> I don't know if any of these services support python3 ful
if anyone knows where it is.
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
On 03/27/2016 04:53 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>
>
> On 3/25/2016 11:15 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
>> I've finished packaging mitaka on Gentoo, won't be marked stable for
>> about a month. The version packaged is based off of the stable/mitaka
>> branch (noted by the ver
On 03/25/2016 12:27 PM, Brant Knudson wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Matthew Thode
> <prometheanf...@gentoo.org <mailto:prometheanf...@gentoo.org>> wrote:
>
> I'm updating the packaging for openstack in preparation for the release
> and n
packager here :D
The basic gist of it is that g-r.txt is what's expected to work and
u-c.txt is what's tested to work. There have been specs out there to
test a lower-contraints.txt file but I haven't seen it go anywhere quite
yet.
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
+1 because it still means something to me
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Deve
ave just from a planning perspective.
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-req
n my opinion, this percentage is this high because
> that's exactly what we suggest in install docs, once we came out with
> a solution we should fix it there as well.
>
>
> On 18 April 2016 at 10:23, Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On 04/18/2016 08:
On 04/18/2016 02:10 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2016-04-18 13:58:03 -0500 (-0500), Matthew Thode wrote:
>> Ya, I'd be happy to work more with upstream. I already review the
>> stable-reqs updates and watch them for the stable branches I package
>> for. Not sur
ling is not something that should be supported given the
>> issues it can have (update cadence and security issues mainly).
>
> That's a useful data point, but it comes across as a threat and I'm
> having trouble taking it as a constructive comment.
>
> Can you truly not imagine any o
didn't mean to come across as a threat, but it is the
>> most likely outcome of doing this. Yes, I could technically package a
>> venv but then I'd be concerned about security issues that come with
>> bundling. Also, at least specifically to gentoo, while we can bund
not in that list.
This is my ordering of how I try and remediate a sec issue.
1. I try to apply the entire patch to affected versions.
2. If that doesn't work and I can remove the bad versions I do that.
3. If that doesn't work I have to start getting creative :D
--
-- Matthew Thode (pr
?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-backwards-compat-libs is about
the test matrix problem across releases.
Also, Gentoo at least supports partial upgrades, I tend to ha
would have to replace it with
> a lot of manual effort to push convergence overall.
>
Well said :D
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing
ck-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
If you will be in the other cross project sessions we can talk, we might
(or might not) share similar opinions :P
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
___
g/assets/survey/April-2016-User-Survey-Report.pdf
> (page
> 36)
>
> __________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questio
enstack-dev
>
That's for the self nomination period. Immediately after that is when
the election would be, we may vote in the meeting that day for just one
of us to be put forward or do a normal election, I don't think we've
clarif
question to put to other projects is, which tests of yours do we
hit when requirements break things for you. This list will hopefully be
used to figure out what we can test our changes against to not cause the
badness.
Any notes on this would be appreciated :D
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire
On 07/27/2016 04:08 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2016-07-27 08:41:17 -0500 (-0500), Matthew Thode wrote:
>> We've started a period of self nomination in preparation for the
>> requirements project fully moving into project (as it's still under Doug
>> Hellmann).
>>
&
send an email to the openstack-dev list.
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev
On 07/27/2016 08:41 AM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> We've started a period of self nomination in preparation for the
> requirements project fully moving into project (as it's still under Doug
> Hellmann).
>
> We are gathering the self nominations here before we vote nex
some subset :P
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:u
he relevant section of the readme is here.
https://github.com/openstack/requirements/#enforcement-in-projects
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Develo
On 08/12/2016 01:47 PM, Andrey Pavlov wrote:
> ec2-api (and gce-api) already has this job, so I just add them to
> projects.txt, right?
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/354899/
yep, looks good, +2
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digit
r answers for your concerns.
>
> Thanks,
> Dims
>
To add, that list has been cleaned up since we first started, so there
was more on it then just that.
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
s as
> well.
>
> --
> Ian Cordasco
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ.
On 08/09/2016 10:22 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org>
> Reply: prometheanf...@gentoo.org <prometheanf...@gentoo.org>, OpenStack
> Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> <openstack-d
On 07/22/2016 10:54 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> One of the things that seems to happen now and then is that an update to
> requirements breaks gate for other projects in some way. One thing that
> helps is cross project testing, though we do that on a one off basis I'd
> like to see
On 08/09/2016 01:37 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
> In that case, they are still co-installable, because the nova minimum
> satisfies both.
The requirements project currently advocates the use of
upper-requirements.txt as what is targeted for packagers. This is
what's tested.
--
-- Matthew
of having to test the packages I
build.
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@
hould look into it again.
I even made a blog post about it a while back.
https://mthode.org/posts/2016/Mar/of-openstack-and-uwsgi/
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
one/tree/setup.cfg#n28
> |
>
> --
> - Brant
I look at it (as a packager), though it is somewhat dubious as to
whether or not what's there is actually needed. Having test-bindep.txt
like we have test-require
minimum. That is likely fine, based on it only actually
being required by the networking-dpm project, though I'd require an ack
from them to get a GR bump considered.
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
causing every consuming project to have to
re-release. I'd need buy-in from them before I consider allowing the
gr-update through, though I'm generally fine with the UC update.
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
ike this.
1. Update UC
2. Update GR
If subscribed to requirements
3. networking-dpm gets an update automatically when the periodic runs
else
3. networking-dpm needs a manual update, can occur before GR update.
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
De
On 01/31/2017 12:18 PM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
> At the moment we are the only consuming project. This is blocking us at the
> moment. How do you suggest moving this forwards?
> Could we remove the upper constraints?
> Thanks
> Gary
>
> On 1/31/17, 6:48 PM, &quo
alk about the GR update, if it's requested.
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ.
We are going to be freezing Thursday at ~20:00 UTC.
So if you need any changes we'll be needing needing them in soon, with
reasoning. Thanks.
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ich should also be the minimum version.
That's fine, I think we expected you to be a little late considering
what you consume.
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Deve
On 01/24/2017 02:22 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> We are going to be freezing Thursday at ~20:00 UTC.
>
> So if you need any changes we'll be needing needing them in soon, with
> reasoning. Thanks.
This is just about 4 hours away now, so second and last reminder.
--
Matthew Thode (pr
On 01/30/2017 03:24 AM, Dmitry Mescheryakov wrote:
> Hello Matthew,
>
> I see that you have frozen my
> CR https://review.openstack.org/#/c/425132/ , but it is for
> stable/newton. Should not freeze apply to master only?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dmitry
>
Yep, fixed, s
picked
> to stable/ocata. Let's please update the upper-constraints with this
> new version.
>
> Thanks,
> Dims
>
UC only is fine with me
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
/openstack-dev
>
This'll impact neutron as well and I'd like their ack on this. Though
it generally looks fine to me.
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack De
docs team reviews on this. We plan on having a meeting
soon at 10:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt if you care to join.
https://review.openstack.org/418772
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On 01/24/2017 09:57 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> Basically I'd like to ask the docs people if they are fine with updating
> the minimum version of sphinx from sphinx>=1.2.1,!=1.3b1,<1.4 to
> sphinx>=1.5.1. This change seems fairly major, especially given that
> there
updates eventually as well).
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/openstack/requirements
> [2] https://github.com/openstack/nova-dpm
> [3] https://github.com/openstack/networking-dpm
> [4] https://github.com/openstack/os-dpm
> [5] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/42648
f the reason I've avoided packaging barbican is this page. That
and projects not really using it. I would like to see more projects
using barbican.
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digit
I actually like the last option (sha) the most, even as a packager I can
just take the file and sort it if I want something more human readable.
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
; I saw that Nova claims mod_wsgi is 'experimental'. Interested in it's
> really experimental or folks use it in production.
>
> Nick
I haven't found any docs on getting mod_wsgi working for glance do you
happen to have a link?
--
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Descr
r-Survey-Report.pdf
>
Perhaps a better option would be to get oslo.db to run cross-project
checks like we do in requirements. That way the right team is covering
the usage of postgres and we still have coverage while still lowering
gate load for most pr
1 - 100 of 315 matches
Mail list logo
