Hi Kevin,
Typically we noticed that the underlay switches maintained a table like this:
VLAN IDMAC Address Learned-Interface
In the physical underlay, with the current architecture if we enable VLAN, the
same DVR Unique
MAC will appear on different VLANs as the packets get DVR
| Firewall |
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Narasimhan, Vivekanandan
vivekanandan.narasim...@hp.com wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Typically we noticed that the underlay switches maintained a table
like
this:
VLAN IDMAC
Managing the ports and plumbing logic is today driven by L2 Agent, with little
assistance
from controller.
If we plan to move that functionality to the controller, the controller has to
be more
heavy weight (both hardware and software) since it has to do the job of L2
Agent for all
Hi Yi,
Swami will be available from this week.
Will it be possible for you to join the regular DVR Meeting (Wed 8AM PST) next
week and we can slot that to discuss this.
I see that FwaaS is of much value for E/W traffic (which has challenges), but
for me it looks easier to implement the
join late or may not be able to join at all.
If I missed it, please see if you can join FWaaS meeting at Wed 11:30AM PST on
openstack-meeting-3. Otherwise, a separated meeting is still preferred
Thanks
Yi
On 7/4/14, 12:23 AM, Narasimhan, Vivekanandan wrote:
Hi Yi,
Swami
Hi,
Recently , the Tox runs started to fail in my workspace.
It fails consistently during installing dependencies with the following.
Downloading/unpacking PrettyTable=0.7,0.8 (from
python-keystoneclient=0.10.0--r
/home/narasimv/dev/bug1350485/neutron/requirements.txt (line 22))
Cleaning
question, what is wrong with Tox now?
-- Igor
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Narasimhan, Vivekanandan
vivekanandan.narasim...@hp.commailto:vivekanandan.narasim...@hp.com wrote:
Hi,
Recently , the Tox runs started to fail in my workspace.
It fails consistently during installing
Hi,
I 've been trying to run test_ovs_neutron_agent.py unit test from openstack
neutron master 'tip', and
am hitting dependency errors for novaclient as here:
Do we need to clone python-novaclient repo as well and point PYTHONPATH to it
and
try re-running the same?
Please help.
Hi Slawek,
I think L2 pop driver needs to be used in conjunction with other mechanism
drivers.
It only deals with pro-actively informing agents on which MAC Addresses became
available/unavailable on cloud nodes and is not meant for binding/unbinding
ports
on segments.
If you configure
Hi ,
We have been trying to understand behavior of security group rules in icehouse
stable.
The default security group contains 4 rules, two ingress and two egress.
The two ingress rules are one for IPv4 and other for IPv6.
We see both the ingress rules use cyclic security groups,
Hi Neutron'ers,
Could you please let us know if all vendor CI tests must pass , If we need to
merge a fix to
the upstream master?
For example , for this bug fix https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93624/
Posted to upstream master for merge, we see failure for Mellanox CI and
Hyper-V CI.
Thanks Carl, for pitching in for us.
As Carl said, this is the last detail that is being worked out.
Wuhogning,
I am requesting Rajeev and Mike(CC'ed) who are working in DVR SNAT
to post the document into to the blueprint link here, so that you
can take a look.
network will be tunneled to NN where SNAT'ing puts them onto
external network.
--
Thanks,
Vivek
-Original Message-
From: A, Keshava
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 1:11 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Carl Baldwin
Cc: Narasimhan, Vivekanandan; Grover
Hi Neutron Stackers,
There is an interest among vendors to bring Least Networks scheduling for DHCP
into Openstack Neutron.
Currently there are the following blueprints lying there, all of them trying to
address this issue:
https://review.openstack.org/111210
Hi Salvatore,
Thanks for the review comments on the BP.
Yes, Maruti’s BP supersedes the review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100278
posted by Isaku, and we
discussed with Isaku during the summit to embrace his BP.
For the review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93613 by Racha , we
Hi Mike,
Few clarifications inline [Vivek]
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kolesnik [mailto:mkole...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 10:58 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2Pop][HA Routers] Request for
Hi Mike,
Just one comment [Vivek]
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kolesnik [mailto:mkole...@redhat.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 11:17 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Robert Kukura
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2Pop][HA Routers]
17 matches
Mail list logo