Hi Clark,
>From: Clark Boylan [mailto:clark.boy...@gmail.com]
>Sent: 11 September 2013 04:44
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] run_tests in debug mode fails
>I did manage to confirm that the attached patch mostly fixes the problem.
with your patch I am able
Hi
> 2. Before submitting the new patch for review it's better to run unit tests
> (tox -epy27) and pep8 check (tox -epep8)
Instead of pep8 I think you should run flake8 we moved to that some months
ago[1].
Usually I find always useful to test my changes in devstack.
Regards
--
Andrea Rosa
[1]
Hi
>On 23.10.2013 11:29, Rosa, Andrea (HP Cloud Services) wrote:
>> Usually I find always useful to test my changes in devstack.
>
>How do you do that? I think the devstack does not always contain up to date
>codebase does it, so what would be the point in testing changes on th
Hi all,
>This is a bit of a social norms thread
>
>I've been consistently asking for tests in reviews for a while now, and I get
>the
>occasional push-back. I think this falls into a few broad camps:
>
>A - there is no test suite at all, adding one in unreasonable B - this thing
>cannot
>be
>-Original Message-
>From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@windriver.com]
>Sent: 31 October 2013 17:07
>To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] When is it okay for submitters to say 'I don't
>want to add tests' ?
>
>O
Hi all
Long story short: a long time ago I raised a bug [1] and I started to work on
the fix: GuoHui LIu (the reviewer) and myself had long and useful discussion
about the right solution for that but now we are stuck and we need some more
opinions to find a proper one.
And now the long story
Hi
>Generally mock is supposed to be used over mox now for python 3 support.
That is my understanding too
>As for when to use mock vs stubs, I think you'll get different opinions from
>different people. Stubs are quick and easy and that's what I used early when I
>started contributing to the pr
finding a common solution for the
original bug.
As soon as we have a consensus I'll be really happy to submit a new patch.
Regards
--
Andrea Rosa
>-Original Message-
>From: Rosa, Andrea (HP Cloud Services)
>Sent: 01 November 2013 14:35
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing Li
Hi Vish,
Thank you very much indeed for your reply!
>From: Vishvananda Ishaya [mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com]
>Sent: 12 November 2013 21:56
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Nova XML serialization bug 1223358 moving
>discussion here to
Hi all,
What happens if a greenthread, after acquiring a lock (not external), it dies?
For example:
A thread is performing the "do_terminate_instance", it has the lock and before
terminating the process it dies, what happens at the lock?
Is that released in some way?
If not I think that all o
Hi Ben,
Thank you very much for your reply.
>That function is using the synchronized decorator, which means that it's
>wrapped by a semaphore context. As I understand it (and someone correct
>me if I'm wrong), if an error happens and an exception is thrown the context
>would be exited and the se
Hi Vish,
>Were other commands working on the compute node? It seems much more
>likely that the node had a hung connection to rabbit. If you are not using tcp
>keepalives, a network hiccup (or failover) can cause half open connections
>where the server thinks the connection is still active so it se
I'd like to turn it off by default, as already pointed in [1] I think the rate
limiting should be managed by something else (for example load balancers) in
front of the API.
Regards
--
Andrea Rosa
[1] http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openstack/operators/28599
From: Joe Gordon [mailto:joe
HI
>AFAIK, amqp only uses the exchange as a dispatcher and all storage is done in
>the queue ... but I could be wrong. I vaguely recall there being a durable
>exchange setting as well as durable queue.
AFAIK if a message can't be routed there are three options:
- the message is discarded (I thi
Hi all
I need to debug a specific test but when I try to run it in debug mode using
the "run_tests -d" (I need to attach pdb) that command fails but if I run the
script without the "-d" option that works.
I created a brand-new env so I don't think it's related to my local env.
Anyone is experien
Hi
I knew that people in China had a 3 days hackathon few months ago I was
thinking to have a similar thing in Europe.
My original idea was to propose to add an extra day after the mid-cycle but I
am not sure if that is a good idea anymore:
CONS:
- the next mid-cycle is going to be the first
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Wang, Shane [mailto:shane.w...@intel.com]
> Sent: 12 November 2015 16:34
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Daniel P.
> Berrange; Bhargava, Ruchi
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] hackathon day
>
> Hey, how about driv
Hi
thanks Sean for bringing this point, I have been working on the change and on
the (abandoned) spec.
I'll try here to summarize all the discussions we had and what we decided.
> From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
> Sent: 02 December 2015 13:31
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (no
One more vote from "not a core member" .
I am not a core and I am mainly involved in the Nova project where Scott
presence is always useful
and valuable when we need to sort out some cinder <-> nova issue.
--
Andrea Rosa
On 27/06, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> I would like to nominate Scott D'Angelo
Hi all,
> Please respond to this post if you have an interest in this and what you
> would like to see done. Include anything you are already getting on with so
> we get a clear picture.
I have put a new spec about "allow more instance actions during the live
migration" [0].
Please note that
Hi all
> Not all of these are covered by specs yet and all the existing specs need
> reviews. Please look at the etherpad and see if there is anything you think is
> missing.
What about adding a way to migrate files which are not migrated at the moment,
like console.log?
I think that could be
Hi all,
I noticed that in the nova API we allow to specify body just for the PUT and
POST requests [0], for all the other methods, if a body is specified, it gets
ignored.
I had a look at the RFC 7231 [1] and I noticed that just the TRACE must not
have a body, for all the other request a body c
> Why is DELETE /volumes/ID?force=true not an option?
> I believe it's valid for DELETE method to take parameters. Just not a body.
I am not 100% sure that it would be considered RESTful as it could violates
some REST principlebut I think we do not want to open this discussion.
So yes it
Hi all
Thank you very much for your feedback, I found the discussion quick and useful.
I'll abandon my change and for the bug fixing I'll pass a parameter in the
DELETE.
Regards
--
ar
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: 11 May 2015 19:29
To: openstack-d
24 matches
Mail list logo
