"policy target" sounds good. +1
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Sumit Naiksatam
wrote:
> Thanks Jay for your constructive feedback on this. I personally think
> that 'policy-target' is a good option. I am not sure what the rest of
> the team thinks, perhaps they can chime in.
>
> On Fri, Aug
I agree with Prasad here.
There remains lots of unknown about Neutron incubator and its workflow at
this point, and the idea of Neutron feature branch is at best in embryonic
stage. It seems like among the three options, the most well-defined one is
indeed through stackforge.
When and if the Neut
I agree with Kevin. Like in Juno, we as a subteam will be shooting for
option 1 (again) for Kilo - ideally we can land in Kilo, and we will work
closely with the community to try to accomplish that. In the meantime, we
need to have a repo to iterate our implementations, build package (Juno
based) t
Hi,
During Thursday's group-policy meeting[1], there are several
policy-rules related issues which we agreed should be posted on the
mailing list to gather community comments / consensus. They are:
(1) Conflict resolution between policy-rules
--- a priority field was added to the policy-
Hi Mohammad,
Good writeup, one minor comment at the end below (look for [s3wong]).
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Mohammad Banikazemi wrote:
> Continuing the discussion we had earlier today during the Neutron Group
> Policy weekly meeting [0], I would like to initiate a couple of email
> t
Hi Subra,
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Subrahmanyam Ongole wrote:
> Hi Stephan
>
> Comments inline for redirect action. Perhaps we may want to discuss each
> section in different email threads.
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Stephen Wong wrote:
>>
>>
Hi Prasad,
Thanks for the comments, please see responses inline.
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Prasad Vellanki
wrote:
> Hi
> Please see inline
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Stephen Wong wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> During Thursda
Hi Kyle,
Almost missed this - sounds good to me.
Thanks,
- Stephen
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> Folks:
>
> I'd like to propose moving the Neutron Group Policy meeting going
> forward, starting with this Thursday. The meeting has been at 1600
> UTC on Thursdays, I
Hi Carlos,
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Carlos Gonçalves wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a couple of questions regarding the ongoing work on Neutron Group
> Policy proposed in [1].
>
> 1. One of the described actions is redirection to a service chain. How do
> you see BPs [2] and [3] addressing servic
[1]
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Neutron_Group_Policy_Sub-Team_Meeting
> >
> > On Feb 11, 2014, at 11:30 AM, Sumit Naiksatam
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Kyle,
> > >
> > > The new time sounds good to me as well, thanks for initiating this.
>
Hi Murali,
There is already a ServiceVM project (Tacker), currently under
development on stackforge:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ServiceVM
If you are interested in this topic, please take a look at the wiki
page above and see if the project's goals align with yours. If so, you are
ce
Hi Sean,
Yes. Please count me in (we need to integrate QoS parameters as
possible actions for group-policy).
Thanks,
- Stephen
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Collins, Sean <
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
> For those attending, to discuss the QoS API current status?
>
> --
> Sean
Hi Sean,
Perfect (I assume it is local time, i.e. 2:30pm EDT).
And I also assume this will be at the Neutron pod?
- Stephen
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Collins, Sean <
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 07:17:26PM EDT, Mohammad Banikazemi wrote:
> >
Hi Chris,
A good number of people involved in Neutron advanced service /
group-policy / individual services subteams will be at the Group Policy
conference session (at 1:30pm). Is it possible to reschedule this to a
different time?
Thanks,
- Stephen
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Chris W
Hi Russ,
Are you in Atlanta? If so, should we find a time to meet at (for
example) the Neutron pod area for face to face meeting over the next two
days?
Thanks,
- Stephen
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> It is clear that a number of us have been working independen
+1 for lunch break tomorrow (Friday) - we can still meet at the Neutron pod
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Steve Gordon wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Alan Kavanagh"
> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Hi Vinay,
I am interested. Please sign up a slot on Neutron pod for tomorrow
(Friday) and announce the timeslot to the ML.
Thanks,
- Stephen
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Vinay Yadhav wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am Vinay, working with Ericsson.
>
> I am interested in the following blueprint re
t are leaving and can't come tomorrow.
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Chris Wright [mailto:chr...@sous-sol.org]
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 11:06 AM
> > > To: Steve Gordon; CARVER, PAUL; Stephen Wong; Alan Kavanagh
> > > Cc
Hi Steve,
Agreed. I believe Chris already suggested this meeting will reconvene
tomorrow (Friday) at lunchtime - and a number of folks already stated that
they will come.
Thanks,
- Stephen
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Steve Gordon wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "IWAM
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > Booked a slot tomorrow at 9:20 AM at the neutron pod.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > main(i){putchar((5852758>>((i-1)/2)*8)-!(1&i)*'\r
Hi,
I am part of the ServiceVM team and I will attend the NFV IRC meetings.
Thanks,
- Stephen
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
> * balaj...@freescale.com (balaj...@freescale.com) wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@noironetw
Hi Sean,
Sounds good! +1
- Stephen
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Collins, Sean <
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The session that we had on the Quality of Service API extension was well
> attended - I would like to keep the momentum going by proposing a weekly
> IRC me
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply. Some comments on Maru's and Amando's points
below:
(1) this model is more complex than linked based
--- as one of the three original members who had action items during the
very first network-policy IRC meeting, I can say that we actually
originally went with th
sorry, please ignore
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Stephen Wong wrote:
> Hey,
>
> What Dan has been waiting for, Geneve support in OVS!!!
>
> - Stephen
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Jesse Gross
> Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:47 PM
Hey,
What Dan has been waiting for, Geneve support in OVS!!!
- Stephen
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jesse Gross
Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:47 PM
Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Basic Geneve Support
To: d...@openvswitch.org
This series implements support for Geneve
(http:
I agree with that, and it should take place before the J-Summit.
Location is key here :-)
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Jorge Miramontes <
jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to gauge everyone's interest in a possible mini-summit for
> Neturon LBaaS. If enoug
+1 - that is a good idea! Having it several days before the J-Summit in
Atlanta would be great.
- Stephen
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Eugene Nikanorov wrote:
> I think mini summit is no worse than the summit itself.
> Everyone who wants to participate can join.
> In fact what we really need
Hi Isaku,
Seems like you had the meeting at 22:00 UTC instead of 23:00 UTC?
[15:01] hello? is anybody there for servicevm meeting?
[15:02] #startmeeting neutron/servicevm
[15:02] Meeting started Tue Mar 11 22:02:14 2014 UTC and is due
to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is yamahata. Inform
Hi Mohammad,
I am sorry to say that the new schedule is indeed 1am EST...
- Stephen
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Mohammad Banikazemi wrote:
> Isaku Yamahata wrote on 03/19/2014 04:38:34 AM:
>
> > From: Isaku Yamahata
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <
> openstack-dev@lists
Hi Kyle,
Is 1730UTC available on that channel? If so, and if it is OK with
everyone, it would be great to have it at 1730 UTC instead (10:30am PDT /
1:30pm EDT, which would also be at the same time on a different day of the
week as the advanced service meeting).
Thanks,
- Stephen
On Thu, A
CC'ed ODL GBP --- although this doesn't concern them at this point, it may
be of interest to the team
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Sachi Gupta wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Request you all to provide inputs of the below queries:
>
>- As per my understanding GBP constructs are mapped to neutron c
Hi Vijay,
Yes, it was logged under advanced service:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_advanced_services/2014/networking_advanced_services.2014-06-27-17.30.log.html
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_advanced_services/2014/networking_advanced_services.2014-06
Hi Sean,
Yes - please make sure it is going to be in the Bay Area this time :-)
Thanks,
- Stephen
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Sean Roberts
wrote:
> I'm thinking location as yahoo Sunnyvale or VMware Palo Alto.
>
> ~sean
>
> On Jul 10, 2014, at 5:12 PM, sean roberts wrote:
>
> The Co
I agree with Hemanth also - that this suggestion should be a different
patch. And we should proceed with the current CLI patch.
Thanks,
- Stephen
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Hemanth Ravi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Adding this CLI command seems to be a good way to provide support for the
> second m
Agreed with Kevin and Sumit here. As a subgroup we talked about Nova
integration, and the preliminary idea, as Bob alluded to, is to add
"endpoint" as an option in place of Neutron port. But if we can make Nova
EPG-aware, it would be great.
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Sumit Naiksatam
wrote:
Hi,
Thanks to Armando for steering the discussion back to the original
intent.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Armando M. wrote:
>
> On 6 August 2014 15:47, Kevin Benton wrote:
>
>> I think we should merge it and just prefix the API for now with
>> '/your_application_will_break_after_juno
+1 for me as well.
So have we finalized on the meeting time?
Thanks,
- Stephen
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
wrote:
>
> On Nov 8, 2013, at 12:01 AM, Brian Haley wrote:
>
>> On 11/08/2013 11:21 AM, Collins, Sean (Contractor) wrote:
>>> How about scheduling an IRC mee
Hi Eugene,
LBaaS meeting on #openstack-meeting was previously schedule on
Thursdays 1400UTC. And indeed it is still listed on
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings as such, so I believe keeping
it in that timeslot should be fine.
- Stephen
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Eugene Nikanoro
Hi Kyle,
So no meeting this Thursday?
Thanks,
- Stephen
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2013, at 8:58 AM, "Stein, Manuel (Manuel)"
> wrote:
>
>> Kyle,
>>
>> I'm afraid your meeting vanished from the Meetings page [2] when user
>> amotiki rewor
+1
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Sridhar Ramaswamy wrote:
> I'd like to propose Sripriya Seetharam to join the Tacker core team.
> Sripriya
> ramped up quickly in early Liberty cycle and had become an expert in the
> Tacker
> code base. Her major contributions include landing MANO API blueprin
+1. Great addition!
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Sripriya Seetharam
wrote:
> +1 , glad to have Lin Cheng on board.
>
>
>
> *From:* Sridhar Ramaswamy [mailto:sric...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 26, 2016 7:45 AM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <
> o
+1
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Haddleton, Bob (Nokia - US) <
bob.haddle...@nokia.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Bob
>
> On Jun 3, 2016, at 8:24 PM, Sridhar Ramaswamy wrote:
>
> Tackers,
>
> I'm happy to propose Bharath Thiruveedula (IRC: tbh) to join the tacker
> core team. Bharath has been contributi
+1. Great addition to the team!
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Henry Fourie
wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
> *From:* Cathy Zhang
> *Sent:* Monday, June 13, 2016 11:36 AM
> *To:* openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; Cathy Zhang
> *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-sfc] Proposing Mohan
> Kumar fo
+1. Great addition to the team indeed!
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Sridhar Ramaswamy
wrote:
> Tackers,
>
> It gives me great pleasure to propose Kanagaraj Manickam to join the
> Tacker core team. In a short time, Kanagaraj has grown into a key member of
> the Tacker team. His enthusiasm and
Wait... is this April's Fool?
(hard to believe project name change resulting from name clashing with a
Marvel comic character)
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
> wrote:
> > We could play words, like Quantron or Neutrum. Actu
+1 on Wednesday lunch
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka
wrote:
> Cathy Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>>
>> We have room 400 at 3:10pm on Thursday available for discussion of the
>> two topics.
>> Another option is to use the common room with roundtables in "Salon C"
>> during Mo
Hi,
Unfortunately I will miss this f2f meeting since I won't arrive until
late evening on Tuesday. But I did update the etherpad LouisF posted [1]
(during the last IRC meeting) with some topics of interest. If any of them
happens to be discussed during Tuesday's meetup, please update the ether
Hi Cathy,
A technical discussion on networking-sfc tomorrow? Really? When and
where? Is this going to be the same one as the common flow classifier
discussion?
Thanks,
- Stephen
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Cathy Zhang
wrote:
> We will have a technical discussion tomorrow and record ou
+1 for Monday
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Mohammad Banikazemi wrote:
> Gal, This time conflicts with the Neutron ML2 weekly meeting time [1]. I
> realize there are several networking related weekly meetings, but I would
> like to see if we can find a different time. I suggest the same time
+1
- Stephen
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Sridhar Ramaswamy
wrote:
> I would like to nominate Bob Haddleton to the Tacker core team.
>
> In the current Liberty cycle Bob made significant, across the board
> contributions to Tacker [1]. Starting with many usability enhancements and
> squashi
Please note the change in time (and day of the week) and channel:
Meeting on #openstack-meeting at 1600 UTC (9:00am PDT)
Agenda can be found here (feel free to add yours):
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Tacker#Meeting_June_4.2C_2015
Thanks,
- Stephen
___
Meeting on #openstack-meeting @ 1600UTC (9am PDT)
Agenda can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Tacker#Meeting_June_11.2C_2015
Thanks,
- Stephen
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questi
+1
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Sridhar Ramaswamy
wrote:
> Tackers,
>
> I'd like to propose Yong Sheng Gong to join the Tacker core team. Yong is
> a seasoned OpenStacker and has been contributing to Tacker project since
> Nov 2015 (early Mitaka). He has been the major force in helping Tacke
Hi Cathy,
Sorry, I won't be attending the summit. Will there be an etherpad to
capture what is going to be discussed regarding networking-sfc during the
summit? If so, please post the link.
Thanks,
- Stephen
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Cathy Zhang
wrote:
> Let’s meet for lunch at the
54 matches
Mail list logo