Could you please clarify? Do you mean you want to setup everything behind
a proxy? or do you mean you want to setup just gerrit behind a proxy?
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:26 PM, thanh le giang
wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I have set up a CI system successfully with directly access to internet.
> Now I
+1
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Michael Krotscheck
wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> StoryBoard is the much anticipated successor to Launchpad, and is a
> component of the Infrastructure Program. The storyboard-core group is
> intended to be a superset of the infra-core group, with additional
> r
Gerrit 2.8 allows setting label values on patch sets either thru the
command line[1] or REST API[2]. Since we will setup WIP as a -1 score
on a label this will just be a matter of updating git-review to set
the label on new patchsets. I'm no sure if there's a bug entered in
our the issue tracker
We plan to set
these options for the 'Code-Review' label, but not the Workflow label.
[1] https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/config-labels.html
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Zaro wrote:
>>
>> Ge
I concur, +1
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:42 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
> The Infrastructure program has a unique three-tier team structure:
> contributors (that's all of us!), core members (people with +2 ability
> on infra projects in Gerrit) and root members (people with
> administrative access).
I concur, +1 for Josh.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:57 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
> The Infrastructure program has a unique three-tier team structure:
> contributors (that's all of us!), core members (people with +2 ability
> on infra projects in Gerrit) and root members (people with
> administrative
Just to let you know, there have been requests to run builds/tests on
drafts changes in the past[1] so it seems like there's been mixed
feelings on running CI on changes that are not ready for human review.
You are correct, making WIP sticky would not work because it is a
per user vote. If someo
Hello All. The Openstack infra team has been planning a gerrit upgrade (to
ver 2.8.x) to review.openstack.org for a while now and we are getting close
to pulling the trigger. We need to get a few more changes approved, test
those changes on review-dev.o.o and then do the upgrade on review.o.o.
Hello All. The OpenStack infra team has been working to put
everything in place so that we can upgrade review.o.o from Gerrit
version 2.4.4 to version 2.8.4 We are happy to announce that we are
finally ready to make it happen!
We will begin the upgrade on Monday, April 28th at 1600 UTC (the
Open
then jenkins failure seems to indicate that jenkins xUnit plugin could
not find any test result files for processing. it could be that the
test didn't get run or that it ran but didn't generate the rest
results required for the plugin to pick up? that's probably where i
would check.
On Thu, Apr
+1
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Joshua Hesketh <
joshua.hesk...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> Absolutely. +1.
>
> Rackspace Australia
>
>
> On 9/27/14 1:34 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
>
>> I'm pleased to nominate Anito Kuno to the project-config core team.
>>
>> The project-config repo is a constitue
+1 for both Marc and Darragh
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Antoine Musso wrote:
>> Le 23/06/2014 01:47, Jeremy Stanley a écrit :
>>> On 2014-06-20 14:01:01 -0700 (-0700), James E. Blair wrote:
> The Jenkins Job Builder project [...]
Sean, there is a proposal[1] in upstream gerrit to fix this issue. David's
proposal is to make Gerrit handle multiple notifications channels per
project which would allow us to treat bot notifications differently than
human notifications. He has the same problem as we do, most of his builds
are d
2014 at 6:38 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 06/27/2014 02:19 PM, Zaro wrote:
> >
> > Sean, there is a proposal[1] in upstream gerrit to fix this issue.
> > David's proposal is to make Gerrit handle multiple notifications
> > channels per project which would allow us to tre
Looks like there are no objections to this nomination so I have made Marc
and Darragh Jenkins Job Builder Core reviewers. Congrats guys and keep the
reviews rolling.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Darragh Bailey
wrote:
>
>
> On 20 June 2014 22:01, James E. Blair wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The J
I believe we are waiting for Mathieu Gagné re-review before approving.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Upstream Gerrit has been working on a tagging feature for a while now.
Take a look at the gerrit discussion thread[1] if you want more info
on how it came about. They decided to call it 'hashtag' or '#' (the
name being very controversial).Looks like some of the feature is
in Gerrit 2.11 alrea
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Spencer Krum wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The infra team will be taking gerrit offline for an upgrade on December
> 16th. We
> will start the operation at 17:00 UTC and will continue until about
> 21:00 UTC.
>
> This outage is to upgrade Gerrit to version 2.11. The IP addre
We have identified this and will look into it soon. Thanks for
reporting the issue.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Michał Dulko wrote:
> On 12/16/2015 10:22 PM, Zaro wrote:
>> Thanks to everyone for their patience while we upgraded to Gerrit
>> 2.11. I'm happy to announ
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Andrea Frittoli
wrote:
> Thanks for the upgrade, and for all the effort you folks put into keeping
> our gerrit close to upstream!
>
> One thing that I find inconvenient in the new UI is the size of the middle
> (test results) column: it's too narrow, no matter ho
forgot this one as well: https://review.openstack.org/241278
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Zaro wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Andrea Frittoli
> wrote:
>> Thanks for the upgrade, and for all the effort you folks put into keeping
>> our gerrit close to upstrea
Hit '?' and it says '/' is find, give that a try.
Looks like in Gerrit 2.11 the 'f' to get a popup of the list of files
is only available in unified diff view. I don't remember if it was
available in side-by-side view on Gerrit 2.8.
-Khai
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
>
These look like upstream issues. Best thing to do is report these
bugs upstream: https://code.google.com/p/gerrit/issues/list
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Aishwarya Thangappa
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I noticed a couple of things which I would like to see fixed.
> 1. When you try to reply to
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
> I noticed another thing. I'm working with a chain of three patches.
> I just updated the patch in the middle [1] to patch set 37. I noticed
> that the list of "Related Changes" (in the upper right of the page)
> didn't look right. The chang
Hello Tang, Openstack slaves only have a single executor so what you are
probably seeing is due to using build slaves that have multiple executors.
There were a few bugs[1] that was fixed recently around these types of
deadlock issues. The new gearman-plugin release[2] contains fixes for
those i
.3
Also I don't think we've ever tested Jenkins and the gearman server running
on the same machine or VM. Maybe one thing you can try is to run them on
separate VMs?
[1] https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Gearman+Plugin
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
>
&g
:
>
> On 07/24/2015 03:36 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
>
> Hi Zaro,
>
> Thanks to reply.
>
> On 07/24/2015 03:06 PM, Zaro wrote:
>
> That is correctly, the Jenkins UI will not show any info about the
> gearman queue. If job is pending in Jenkins that means it's b
.com/p/gerrit/issues/detail?id=3424
Thank You.
- Khai (AKA zaro)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstac
Hello All,
The openstack-infra team would like to upgrade from our Gerrit 2.8 to
Gerrit 2.11. We are proposing to do the upgrade shortly after the
Mitaka summit. The main motivation behind the upgrade is to allow us
to take advantage of some of the new REST api, ssh commands, and
stream events f
Thanks for the suggestion Markus. I think the path for those types of
suggestions would be thru a spec:
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack-infra/infra-specs/
Thanks for reporting these Yuriy. I've created a checklist[1] to
track things to verify before we actually do anything. I think at
thi
I would encourage you to take a look at zuul but if you prefer not to use
it then I believe you can also achieve your use case just using Jenkins by
setting up multiple jobs with the same trigger. The jenkins job builder
tool will help you setup and manage those jobs.
-Khai
__
There is a new web and android interface that's being developed by
guys at Google however it's not available on our version of Gerrit. I
think it probably won't be ready until Gerrit ver 2.13+
web interface (polymer+gerrit = polygerrit):
This interface is already very usable in Gerrit 2.12. Curr
Hello. I think there might be something wrong with git-review in your
env. You might want try in another env, preferably linux if its handy. I
noticed your origin is from github? you should clone from here instead:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/congress
Here's what you should get wh
To follow up on Robert's post, Gerrit's query command [1] supports the
retrieval of comments for each patchset so maybe we just need to add the
'--comments' option when requesting changes [2] ?
Since I've posted, I'll just provide my own opinion on this topic. I have
no problems with a -1 ask a q
34 matches
Mail list logo
